《鹿特丹规则》批量合同管辖权规定评析

发布时间：2019-06-27 10:51

【摘要】：本文对《鹿特丹规则》中关于批量合同管辖权的规定进行了详细的阐释和评析。公约允许批量合同当事人协议选择管辖法院,在满足一定条件的前提下,认可法院选择协议的排他性效力,并且该法院选择协议在符合一定条件下可以约束批量合同以外的第三人。笔者认为符合条件的批量合同当事人双方订立的管辖权条款排他性地约束合同双方当事人是必要而合理的;不过排他性法院选择协议的效力宽松地扩及第三方,可能显失公平。《鹿特丹规则》关于批量合同管辖权的规定对我国具有借鉴影响,因此我们可以借鉴公约中批量合同管辖权的规定来指导海事审判实践,尤其是有关提单管辖权条款效力的问题;并且为保护第三人不受批量合同管辖权条款的过度约束,我们可以在国内立法中明确表示:除非得到第三人的明确同意,否则第三人不受排他性管辖权条款约束。本文除引言外,共分四章:第1章介绍了海上货物运输立法中管辖权规定的发展,包括《汉堡规则》之前有关管辖权的规定、《汉堡规则》中有关管辖权的规定以及《鹿特丹规则》中有关管辖权的规定。第2章对《鹿特丹规则》中有关批量合同管辖权的规定进行详细的阐释。包括《鹿特丹规则》批量合同管辖权规定的设立和内容两方面。第3章对《鹿特丹规则》有关批量合同管辖权规定进行评析。包括对公约第67条第1款的合理性评析和第67条第2款的合理性评析。第4章分析批量合同管辖权规定对我国的影响,分析批量合同管辖权规定对我国司法主权和司法实践产生的影响;建议借鉴公约批量合同管辖权的规定,完善我国司法实践。
[Abstract]:In this paper, the provisions of the Rotterdam rules on the jurisdiction of volume contracts are explained and evaluated in detail. The convention allows the parties to the volume contract to choose the jurisdiction court, and on the premise of satisfying certain conditions, recognizes the exclusive effect of the court selection agreement, and the court choice agreement can bind the third party other than the volume contract under certain conditions. The author thinks that it is necessary and reasonable for the parties to the volume contract to bind the parties to the contract exclusively by the jurisdiction clause concluded by the parties to the volume contract. However, the effectiveness of exclusive court selection agreement is extended to third parties, which may be unfair. The provisions of Rotterdam rules on the jurisdiction of volume contract have reference influence on our country, so we can draw lessons from the provisions of volume contract jurisdiction in the convention to guide the maritime trial practice, especially on the validity of the jurisdiction clause of bill of lading. In order to protect the third party from the excessive restraint of the jurisdiction clause of the volume contract, we can make it clear in the domestic legislation that unless the express consent of the third party is obtained, the third party is not bound by the exclusive jurisdiction clause. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into four chapters: chapter 1 introduces the development of jurisdiction provisions in the legislation of carriage of goods by sea, including the provisions on jurisdiction before the Hamburg rules, the provisions on jurisdiction in the Hamburg rules and the provisions on jurisdiction in the Rotterdam rules. Chapter 2 explains in detail the provisions of the Rotterdam rules on the jurisdiction of volume contracts. Including the Rotterdam rules volume contract jurisdiction provisions of the establishment and content of two aspects. Chapter 3 comments on the jurisdiction of volume contract in Rotterdam rules. Including the reasonableness assessment of article 67, paragraph 1, and article 67, paragraph 2, of the convention. Chapter 4 analyzes the influence of the jurisdiction of volume contract on our country, analyzes the influence of the jurisdiction of volume contract on the judicial sovereignty and judicial practice of our country, and suggests that we should draw lessons from the provisions of the jurisdiction of volume contract of the convention and perfect the judicial practice of our country.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D996.19

【相似文献】