东南亚海洋生物多样性保护的国际机制研究
发布时间：2020-10-11 13:54
海洋生物多样性不仅对维持全球数百万人的生计至关重要,而且对全球追求可持续发展也至关重要的。过去几十年国际社会创作大量的国际条约,政策与行动计划,是为了减缓生物多样性的迅速丧失。东南亚是世界上物种多样性最丰富的地区之一,然而,东南亚受到许多人为因素的威胁,过度捕捞是最重要的原因之一。本文研究了三种不同的治理框架:硬法框架,软法框架与实现框架。硬法框架包括国际条约,软法框架包括没有约束力的国际政策文件与行动计划,实现框架包括国际法[硬法]的承诺以及从软法框架里采取的生物多样性保护理念——它们共同创造并启用被国立与非政府组织实现的保护措施如海洋保护区。这三个框架在海洋生物多样性保护目标上是不可分割的,相互支持的,但是现代的研究大多数只考察各框架分别的影响。本文全方面探讨了三个框架作为一个相互关联系统,并展示了非国家参与者在东南亚地区应用全球环境法律和政策的重要作用。
【学位单位】：厦门大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位年份】：2018
【中图分类】：D996.9
【文章目录】：
List of abbreviations
摘要
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Terminological and methodological basis
2.1 Terminology
2.2 Methodology and premises
2.2.1 Methodology
2.2.2 Premises
2.3 Literature review
Chapter 3 Evolution of international (legal) thought
3.1 The Disaster era
3.2 The Stockholm era
3.3 The Rio era
3.4 Conclusion
Chapter 4 International instruments
4.1 Hard law as a global instrument
4.1.1 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
4.1.2 Convention on Biological Diversity
4.1.2.1 Nagoya Protocol
4.1.2.2 Aichi Biodiversity Targets
4.1.3 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Faunaand Flora
4.1.4 Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal,Unreported and Unregulated Fishing
4.1.5 Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and NaturalHeritage
4.1.6 High seas and biodiversity protection
4.1.7 FAO Code on responsible fisheries
4.2 Soft law as a global instrument
4.2.1 The UN Charter
4.2.2 International human rights documents
4.2.2.1 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and International Covenanton Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
4.2.2.2 The right to development
4.2.3. Stockholm Declaration
4.2.4 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development and Agenda 21
4.2.5 World Summit on Sustainable Development
4.2.6 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development
4.3 Regional instruments
4.3.1 ASEAN Charter and the ASEAN Declaration of Human Rights
4.3.2 ASEAN Declaration on Heritage Parks
4.3.3 Regional IUU fishing initiatives
4.3.4 Other ASEAN documents
4.4 Non-state players as instruments for biodiversity protection
4.4.1 ASEAN Center for Biodiversity
4.4.2 UNESCO
4.4.3 International Union for Conservation of Natural Resources
4.4.4 Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries, and Food Security
4.4.5 World Wide Fund for Nature
Chapter 5 Case study-Marine Protected Areas in SE Asia
5.1 Internationally recognized marine protected areas
5.2 Issues concerning marine protected areas in SE Asia
5.3 Tubbataha Reef National Park
5.4 Recommendations
Chapter 6 Framework analysis of selected international instruments
6.1 Hard law framework analysis
6.2 Soft law framework analysis
6.3 Implementation framework analysis
6.4 Conclusion for analysis
Chapter 7 Conclusion
7.1 Final conclusion for the hard law framework
7.2 Final conclusion for the soft law framework
7.3 Final conclusion for the implementation framework
7.4 Initial premises vs. framework analysis results
7.5 Problems and recommendations
7.6 Further research
References
Acknowledgements
本文编号：2836676
【学位单位】：厦门大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位年份】：2018
【中图分类】：D996.9
【文章目录】：
List of abbreviations
摘要
Abstract
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Terminological and methodological basis
2.1 Terminology
2.2 Methodology and premises
2.2.1 Methodology
2.2.2 Premises
2.3 Literature review
Chapter 3 Evolution of international (legal) thought
3.1 The Disaster era
3.2 The Stockholm era
3.3 The Rio era
3.4 Conclusion
Chapter 4 International instruments
4.1 Hard law as a global instrument
4.1.1 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea
4.1.2 Convention on Biological Diversity
4.1.2.1 Nagoya Protocol
4.1.2.2 Aichi Biodiversity Targets
4.1.3 Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Faunaand Flora
4.1.4 Agreement on Port State Measures to Prevent, Deter and Eliminate Illegal,Unreported and Unregulated Fishing
4.1.5 Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and NaturalHeritage
4.1.6 High seas and biodiversity protection
4.1.7 FAO Code on responsible fisheries
4.2 Soft law as a global instrument
4.2.1 The UN Charter
4.2.2 International human rights documents
4.2.2.1 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and International Covenanton Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
4.2.2.2 The right to development
4.2.3. Stockholm Declaration
4.2.4 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development and Agenda 21
4.2.5 World Summit on Sustainable Development
4.2.6 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development
4.3 Regional instruments
4.3.1 ASEAN Charter and the ASEAN Declaration of Human Rights
4.3.2 ASEAN Declaration on Heritage Parks
4.3.3 Regional IUU fishing initiatives
4.3.4 Other ASEAN documents
4.4 Non-state players as instruments for biodiversity protection
4.4.1 ASEAN Center for Biodiversity
4.4.2 UNESCO
4.4.3 International Union for Conservation of Natural Resources
4.4.4 Coral Triangle Initiative on Coral Reefs, Fisheries, and Food Security
4.4.5 World Wide Fund for Nature
Chapter 5 Case study-Marine Protected Areas in SE Asia
5.1 Internationally recognized marine protected areas
5.2 Issues concerning marine protected areas in SE Asia
5.3 Tubbataha Reef National Park
5.4 Recommendations
Chapter 6 Framework analysis of selected international instruments
6.1 Hard law framework analysis
6.2 Soft law framework analysis
6.3 Implementation framework analysis
6.4 Conclusion for analysis
Chapter 7 Conclusion
7.1 Final conclusion for the hard law framework
7.2 Final conclusion for the soft law framework
7.3 Final conclusion for the implementation framework
7.4 Initial premises vs. framework analysis results
7.5 Problems and recommendations
7.6 Further research
References
Acknowledgements
本文编号：2836676
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/2836676.html
