“两岸钓鱼岛岛礁法律地位研讨会”综述
发布时间：2023-04-25 01:59
2018年10月13日—14日,由厦门大学南海研究院、厦门大学海洋法与中国东南海疆研究中心主办,上海国际战略问题研究会、明月书院、世界华人保钓联盟协办的"两岸钓鱼岛岛礁法律地位研讨会"在福建省厦门市召开。来自海峡两岸暨香港的60余位专家和学者出席了会议。与会专家和学者主要就下述4个议题进行了交流和探讨:(1)南海仲裁案认定岛礁法律地位之法理谬误;(2)钓鱼岛及其附属岛礁主权归属中国之证据;(3)钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿之法律地位与东海划界;(4)钓鱼岛问题解决之路径。本次会议从多个层面讨论了钓鱼岛岛礁信息,为全面掌握钓鱼岛及其各附属岛礁的地理、历史信息,以及全面分析钓鱼岛岛礁法律地位奠定了基础。
【文章页数】：30 页
【文章目录】：
一、南海仲裁案认定岛礁法律地位之法理谬误
(一)南海仲裁庭对《公约》第121条第3款的错误解释与适用
(二)南海仲裁案中岛礁法律地位认定之逻辑混乱
(三)国际司法裁决对岛礁法律地位认定的影响
二、钓鱼岛及其附属岛礁主权归属中国之证据
(一)钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿与周边海域的地质地理信息
(二)钓鱼岛及其附属岛礁主权归属中国之历史证据
(三)钓鱼岛及其附属岛礁主权归属中国之图文证据
(四)钓鱼岛及其附属岛礁主权归属中国之国际法依据
三、钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿之法律地位与东海划界
(一)大陆国家远海群岛法律制度
(二)关于《马关条约》第2条的解释与钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿主权归属
(三)钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿之法律地位
(四)钓鱼岛与东海划界
四、钓鱼岛问题解决之路径
(一)学术研究与保钓运动相结合
(二)重视琉球在解决钓鱼岛问题中的角色
(三)重视韩国在钓鱼岛问题上的立场
(四)和平解决钓鱼岛争端
I.Jurisprudential Fallacy Underlying the Determination of the Legal Status of Some Features Involved in the South China Sea Arbitration
A.The Arbitral Tribunal’s Misinterpretation and Misapplication of Article 121(3)
B.Logical Inconsistencies and Fallacies in the Determination of the Legal Status of Some Features Involved in the South China Sea Arbitration
C.Impact of the International Judicial Decisions on the Determination of the Legal Status of Some Maritime Features
II.Evidence Supporting China’s Claim of Sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands
A.Geology and Geography of the Diaoyu Islands and Adjacent Waters
B.Historical Evidence Supporting China’s Claim of Sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands
C.Cartographic and Textual Evidence Corroborating China’s Claim of Sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands
D.International Rules Supporting China’s Claims of Sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands
III.Legal Status of the Diaoyu Islands and Maritime Delimitation in the East China Sea
A.Regime of Distant Archipelagos of Continental States
B.Interpretation of Article 2 of Treaty of Shimonoseki and the Diaoyu Islands Sovereignty Ownership
C.Legal Status of the Diaoyu Islands
D.The Diaoyu Islands and Maritime Delimitation in the East China Sea
IV.Possible Solutions to the Diaoyu Islands Dispute
A.To Undertake a Two-Pronged Effort in Academic Research and Diaoyu Islands Defense Campaigns
B.To Pay More Attention to Role of the Ryukyu Islands in Settlement of the Diaoyu Islands Dispute
C.To Place Greater Importance on South Korea’s Standpoint in the Diaoyu Islands Dispute
D.To Solve the Diaoyu Islands Dispute Through Peaceful Means
本文编号：3800475
【文章页数】：30 页
【文章目录】：
一、南海仲裁案认定岛礁法律地位之法理谬误
(一)南海仲裁庭对《公约》第121条第3款的错误解释与适用
(二)南海仲裁案中岛礁法律地位认定之逻辑混乱
(三)国际司法裁决对岛礁法律地位认定的影响
二、钓鱼岛及其附属岛礁主权归属中国之证据
(一)钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿与周边海域的地质地理信息
(二)钓鱼岛及其附属岛礁主权归属中国之历史证据
(三)钓鱼岛及其附属岛礁主权归属中国之图文证据
(四)钓鱼岛及其附属岛礁主权归属中国之国际法依据
三、钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿之法律地位与东海划界
(一)大陆国家远海群岛法律制度
(二)关于《马关条约》第2条的解释与钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿主权归属
(三)钓鱼岛及其附属岛屿之法律地位
(四)钓鱼岛与东海划界
四、钓鱼岛问题解决之路径
(一)学术研究与保钓运动相结合
(二)重视琉球在解决钓鱼岛问题中的角色
(三)重视韩国在钓鱼岛问题上的立场
(四)和平解决钓鱼岛争端
I.Jurisprudential Fallacy Underlying the Determination of the Legal Status of Some Features Involved in the South China Sea Arbitration
A.The Arbitral Tribunal’s Misinterpretation and Misapplication of Article 121(3)
B.Logical Inconsistencies and Fallacies in the Determination of the Legal Status of Some Features Involved in the South China Sea Arbitration
C.Impact of the International Judicial Decisions on the Determination of the Legal Status of Some Maritime Features
II.Evidence Supporting China’s Claim of Sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands
A.Geology and Geography of the Diaoyu Islands and Adjacent Waters
B.Historical Evidence Supporting China’s Claim of Sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands
C.Cartographic and Textual Evidence Corroborating China’s Claim of Sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands
D.International Rules Supporting China’s Claims of Sovereignty over the Diaoyu Islands
III.Legal Status of the Diaoyu Islands and Maritime Delimitation in the East China Sea
A.Regime of Distant Archipelagos of Continental States
B.Interpretation of Article 2 of Treaty of Shimonoseki and the Diaoyu Islands Sovereignty Ownership
C.Legal Status of the Diaoyu Islands
D.The Diaoyu Islands and Maritime Delimitation in the East China Sea
IV.Possible Solutions to the Diaoyu Islands Dispute
A.To Undertake a Two-Pronged Effort in Academic Research and Diaoyu Islands Defense Campaigns
B.To Pay More Attention to Role of the Ryukyu Islands in Settlement of the Diaoyu Islands Dispute
C.To Place Greater Importance on South Korea’s Standpoint in the Diaoyu Islands Dispute
D.To Solve the Diaoyu Islands Dispute Through Peaceful Means
本文编号：3800475
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/guojifa/3800475.html
