我国划定公益林行为的法律性质与其中的民事权利保护

发布时间：2018-01-19 06:11

本文关键词： 公益林划定法律性质管制性征收民事权利保护　出处：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：公益林在保护生态环境、加强国防、促进科学实验等方面起着至关重要的作用。但森林一旦被国家划定为公益林，就意味着相关林区严禁采伐，林业主体不能进行任何林业经营活动。如此对林业权利的极端限制导致林业经营主体的合法权益受到严重侵害。为了解决这一问题，本文引入了国外的管制性征收制度，对我国划定公益林的行为的法律性质进行分析。本文认为，我国政府对公益林的划定行为没有启动正式的征收程序，只是通过一些法令对林业经营主体的财产权进行限制，在实质上产生了权利被剥夺的后果。这符合管制性征收的制度特征，应属于管制性征收。在此基础上，本文针对公益林划定过程中涉及的民事权利，提出了保护林业经营主体的民事权利的合理建议。本文共分七个部分：第一部分通过介绍石光银的案例提出本文拟讨论的问题：我国划定公益林的行为的法律性质是什么？如何保护此中涉及的林业经营主体的合法权利？第二部分介绍了国内公益林制度的实践与理论现状，重点阐述了学界对于公益林划定行为的三种观点：征用说、财产限制说、管制性征收说。第三部分重点讨论了管制性征收制度。首先分别阐述了美国和德国的相关制度的产生和演变。而后据此总结出管制性征收的概念及特征。第四部分分析了公益林划定行为的法律性质。对征用说和财产限制说进行了驳斥，，并结合上部分总结的管制性征收的概念和特征，得出公益林划定行为属于管制性征收的结论。第五部分梳理了划定公益林的过程中所涉及的林业经营主体的民事权利。第六部分为如何保护林业经营主体的民事权利提出了意见。主要从三方面阐述：事前的程序性权利、事后的诉讼性权利以及补偿制度。第七部分总结全文。
[Abstract]:Public welfare forest plays a vital role in protecting the ecological environment, strengthening national defense and promoting scientific experiments. But once the forest is designated as a public welfare forest by the state, it means that cutting is strictly prohibited in the relevant forest areas. The forestry subject can't carry out any forestry management activities, and the extreme restriction of forestry rights will seriously infringe on the legitimate rights and interests of the forestry management subject. In order to solve this problem, this paper introduces the foreign regulatory expropriation system, and analyzes the legal nature of the behavior of delimiting public welfare forest in China. Our government has not started the formal expropriation procedure for the demarcation of public welfare forest, but has restricted the property rights of forestry management subject through some decrees. In essence, there are the consequences of the deprivation of rights. This conforms to the system characteristics of regulatory expropriation and should belong to the regulatory expropriation. On this basis, this paper aims at the civil rights involved in the delineation process of public welfare forest. The reasonable suggestion of protecting the civil rights of forestry management subject is put forward. This paper is divided into seven parts: The first part puts forward the question to be discussed in this paper by introducing Shi Guangyin's case: what is the legal nature of the behavior of delimiting the public welfare forest in our country? How to protect the legal rights of forestry management subjects involved in this? The second part introduces the practice and theory of the public welfare forest system in China, focusing on the academic community to define the behavior of public welfare forest three views: expropriation theory, property restriction theory, regulatory expropriation theory. The third part mainly discusses the system of regulatory expropriation. Firstly, it expounds the emergence and evolution of the relevant systems in the United States and Germany, and then summarizes the concept and characteristics of the regulated expropriation. Part 4th analyzes the legal nature of the demarcation of public welfare forest. It refutes the theory of expropriation and the theory of property restriction, and combines the concept and characteristics of regulatory expropriation summarized in the preceding part. Draw the conclusion that the demarcation behavior of public welfare forest belongs to the control expropriation. Part 5th combs the civil rights of forestry management subject involved in the process of delimiting public welfare forest. Part 6th puts forward some suggestions on how to protect the civil rights of forestry management subjects, mainly from three aspects: the procedural rights in advance, the procedural rights afterwards and the compensation system. Part 7th summarizes the full text.
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D922.63;D923.2

【参考文献】