当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 环境法论文 >

对生态侵权救济法律问题的探讨

发布时间:2018-02-05 03:10

  本文关键词: 生态侵权救济 生态损害赔偿 环境侵权 生态侵权 生态安全 出处:《中国地质大学(北京)》2009年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】: 本文对于生态侵权救济法律问题的论述,是基于环境侵权既包括对坏境的污染还包括对生态的损害这一前提下进行的。作为环境侵权类型之一的生态侵权,引起生态损害的发生,影响生态平衡,直接关系到与人类生存相关的生态安全问题。生态安全表面上看,是生态系统对于人类的安全,但实际的基础问题是首先确保生态系统自身的安全。这就需要我们不应仅仅局限于环境污染这一个方面来做出反应,而应重视生态侵权的救济,把生态侵权作为环境侵权的一个重要内容,引入到现行法律制度当中。 本文主要从救济的视角出发,分析生态侵权的理论基础,联系环境侵权及污染型环境侵权的特征,完成对相关法律制度的分析。生态损害的特点及现代环境伦理观,决定了生态侵权救济的重要性,对生态侵权损害进行救济是维护生态安全、保持社会稳定的需要。通过对生态侵权救济的法律关系、救济原则、救济方式等理论上的分析,可以更好地把握建立生态侵权救济体系的重要性。文章在梳理相关问题的过程中,重点把关注点放在了关于生态侵权归责原则的选择、因果关系的界定及公私法在救济制度中的结合这几个方面。因为正是对于这几个重点问题的探讨,才完善了建立生态侵权救济体系的大体思路。随后就是为探索具有环境法自身特色的救济途径,所提出的完善这个体系的几点建议。文章的最后,基于生态侵权救济的研究与生态安全战略实施的相关性,重新考虑了环境法上的生态安全的理念,展开了对生态安全立法上的探索。 总之,现行的环境侵权救济制度中,很少有专门性、系统性的对于生态侵权损害救济的价值和功能的探讨。我国现行立法中的环境侵权主要指因环境污染而造成他人损害或危险的事实。以环境污染为中心对环境侵权进行建构已经成为传统思维的惯例,无论是在民法的侵权法领域,还是在环境法的视野中,均忽略了生态遭受破坏的那一部分损害填补,这是不全面,也是不公平的。基于目前对生态侵权有关的问题和事实的分析,有必要对于救济制度进行总结和探讨,这对于我国生态安全战略的制定与实施,无疑会起到积极的作用。
[Abstract]:This paper discusses the legal issues of ecological tort relief based on the premise that environmental tort includes both environmental pollution and ecological damage. As one of the types of environmental tort ecological tort. The occurrence of ecological damage, the impact of ecological balance, directly related to the survival of human ecological security issues. Ecological security, on the surface, is the ecosystem for human security. However, the practical basic problem is to ensure the safety of the ecosystem itself, which requires us not only to limit our response to environmental pollution, but also to pay attention to the remedy of ecological infringement. As an important part of environmental tort, ecological tort is introduced into the current legal system. From the perspective of relief, this paper analyzes the theoretical basis of ecological tort, linking the characteristics of environmental tort and pollution-type environmental tort. The completion of the analysis of relevant legal systems, ecological damage characteristics and modern environmental ethics, determines the importance of ecological tort relief, ecological tort damage relief is to maintain ecological security. The need to maintain social stability. Through the ecological tort relief of the legal relationship, relief principles, relief methods and other theoretical analysis. Can better grasp the importance of the establishment of ecological tort relief system. In the process of combing the relevant issues, the article focuses on the selection of the principle of liability for ecological infringement. The definition of causality and the combination of public and private law in the relief system. Only then has perfected the establishment ecology tort relief system general idea. Then is in order to explore the environmental law own characteristic relief way, proposed consummates this system several suggestions. Based on the correlation between the research of ecological tort relief and the implementation of ecological security strategy, this paper reconsiders the concept of ecological security in environmental law and explores the legislation of ecological security. In a word, there are few specialties in the current relief system of environmental tort. A systematic discussion on the value and function of the remedy for ecological tort damage. The environmental tort in the current legislation of our country mainly refers to the fact that environmental pollution causes damage or danger to others. Taking environmental pollution as the center, it invades the environment. The construction of the right has become the convention of the traditional thinking. Whether in the field of tort law of civil law or in the field of environmental law, it is incomplete to ignore the damage to the ecological damage. Based on the analysis of the problems and facts related to ecological tort, it is necessary to summarize and discuss the relief system, which is the formulation and implementation of ecological security strategy in China. There is no doubt that it will play a positive role.
【学位授予单位】:中国地质大学(北京)
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2009
【分类号】:D922.6

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 杨萍;;环境侵权损害赔偿制度的完善——从环境责任社会化的角度[J];常州工学院学报(社科版);2007年02期

2 刘文燕;论生态侵权的归责原则[J];中国司法;2005年04期

3 李艳芳;我国生态安全的现状与法律保障[J];法商研究;2004年02期

4 王立峰;关于惩罚性赔偿的一些思考——兼与《民法同质补偿原则新思考》一文作者商榷[J];法学;2000年06期

5 竺效;;反思松花江水污染事故行政罚款的法律尴尬——以生态损害填补责任制为视角[J];法学;2007年03期

6 郭萌;;浅论生态侵权救济的理论困境[J];法制与社会;2006年24期

7 曲格平;关注生态安全之一:生态环境问题已经成为国家安全的热门话题[J];环境保护;2002年05期

8 王明远;中国环境侵权救济法律制度的现状及其完善[J];环境导报;2000年03期

9 张才琴;;我国生态安全问题的法律对策[J];经营与管理;2007年09期

10 黄伟明;;浅议环境生态损害及其救济[J];科学咨询;2006年09期



本文编号:1491950

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/1491950.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户037d9***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com