论环境保护相邻权

发布时间：2018-04-11 15:42

本文选题：环境保护相邻权 + 相邻安宁权　；参考：《吉林大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 随着环境问题的日益严重,人们对环境的关注也日益加强。生活方式的丰富化及产业的迅速发展给相邻的主体带来便利的同时,也带来了严重的环境问题。各种噪声、废气、烟尘等等的侵扰,不仅影响了人们的身体健康,也侵害了人们在安宁、清洁的环境中生活的权利。根据有损害就有救济的原则,我们应该给予相邻的受害人积极的权利救济措施。传统相邻权在这一方面表现出不足,所以,本文提出环境保护相邻权这一权利概念,以便应对环境问题产生的冲突。本文从环境保护相邻权的概念、特征入手,分析了它与传统相邻权的不同,及应包括的内容。同时,介绍了国外有关国家在这一方面的立法与实践,然后根据本国现状,提出我国法律应明确环境保护相邻权的法律地位。在此基础上,提出以“过度性”作为侵权构成的实质性要件,在救济时应给予精神损害赔偿并引入惩罚性赔偿机制。
[Abstract]:With the increasingly serious environmental problems, people pay more and more attention to the environment.The enrichment of life style and the rapid development of industry bring convenience to neighboring subjects, but also bring serious environmental problems.All kinds of noise, exhaust gas, smoke and dust not only affect people's health, but also violate people's right to live in a peaceful and clean environment.According to the principle that there is damage or relief, we should give active right relief measures to neighboring victims.The traditional neighboring right is inadequate in this aspect, so this paper puts forward the concept of the right to environmental protection, in order to deal with the conflicts caused by environmental problems.Starting with the concept and characteristics of the neighboring right of environmental protection, this paper analyzes the difference between it and the traditional neighboring right and the contents that should be included.At the same time, the legislation and practice of foreign countries in this field are introduced, and then according to the present situation of our country, the legal status of the neighboring right of environmental protection should be clearly defined in our country's law.On this basis, the author puts forward that "excess" should be regarded as the essential element of tort, and the compensation for spiritual damage should be given and the punitive damages should be introduced in the course of relief.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D922.68;D923

【引证文献】