论环境资源案件跨区域集中管辖制度的完善

发布时间：2018-04-21 13:01

本文选题：环境资源案件 + 跨区域　；参考：《华东师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年01期

【摘要】：我国环境资源案件跨区域集中管辖尚处于探索阶段,各地做法不一。现行主要做法是根据生态系统或生态功能区、案件性质和河流流域、环境资源案件数量、人口数量和经济社会发展水平等因素确定集中管辖法院,或者依托铁路法院实现跨区域集中管辖,实行环境资源案件"二合一"或"三合一"的审理模式。跨区域集中管辖适度打破了行政区划和司法区划的重合,具备良好的价值和作用。但在实践中,存在法律依据不足、跨区域程度不高、不方便当事人诉讼、环境资源刑事案件跨区域管辖难以落实等问题和局限。要突破现行改革的局限性,应将跨区域集中管辖法定化,调整集中管辖的层级和地域范围,同时积极采取措施方便当事人诉讼。
[Abstract]:The cross-regional centralized jurisdiction of environmental resources cases in China is still in the exploration stage. The main current practice is to determine the centralized jurisdiction of courts based on factors such as ecosystems or ecological functional zones, the nature of cases and river basins, the number of cases involving environmental resources, the number of population and the level of economic and social development, etc. Or rely on the railway court to realize the centralized jurisdiction over different regions and carry out the trial mode of "two in one" or "three in one" in environmental and resource cases. Cross-regional centralized jurisdiction breaks the overlap of administrative division and judicial division and has good value and function. However, in practice, there are some problems and limitations, such as insufficient legal basis, low cross-regional degree, inconvenient litigant action, and difficult implementation of cross-regional jurisdiction of environmental and resource criminal cases. In order to break through the limitation of current reform, we should legalize centralized jurisdiction across regions, adjust the level and regional scope of centralized jurisdiction, and take active measures to facilitate litigants' litigation.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学法学院诉讼法学教学研究中心;中国农业大学教务处;
【基金】：北京师范大学“中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金”(项目编号:SKZZY2015012)项目
【分类号】：D922.6;D925

【相似文献】