生态损害救济中环保组织的错位与归位——以“中国绿发会诉中铝民事公益诉讼案”为切入点

发布时间：2018-05-23 17:03

本文选题：生态损害救济 + 环保组织　；参考：《求索》2017年10期

【摘要】："中国绿发会诉中铝民事公益诉讼案"中,中国绿发会没有区分环境保护行政义务与环境民事法律责任,混淆了环境公益与个体私益,模糊了环境执法与环境司法的界限,是环保组织在生态损害救济中错位的典型个案。环境行政执法不力、环境公益诉讼立法不够完善和环境司法权不当扩张,是环保组织在生态损害救济中错位的主要原因。要使环保组织在生态损害救济中回归原本的定位、发挥应有的功能,理论上需探明环保组织的应然定位与功能,需厘清环境执法与环境司法的应然关系;实践中应当推进环境监督管理体制改革、完善环境公益诉讼相关立法和明晰环境执法与环境司法的界限等。
[Abstract]:In the case of China Green Development Association v. Chinalco Civil Public interest lawsuit, the Chinese Green hair Association did not distinguish between environmental protection administrative obligations and environmental civil legal liabilities, confused environmental public welfare with individual private interests, and blurred the boundary between environmental law enforcement and environmental justice. Environmental protection organizations in ecological damage relief in the typical case of dislocation. Weak enforcement of environmental administration, imperfect legislation of environmental public interest litigation and improper expansion of environmental judicial power are the main reasons for the dislocation of environmental protection organizations in the relief of ecological damage. In order to make the environmental protection organization return to its original position and play its due function in the relief of ecological damage, it is necessary in theory to find out the orientation and function of the environmental protection organization, and to clarify the relationship between environmental law enforcement and environmental justice. In practice, we should promote the reform of environmental supervision and management system, perfect the relevant legislation of environmental public interest litigation and clarify the boundary between environmental law enforcement and environmental justice.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学;
【基金】：重庆市教委人文社会科学研究一般项目“生态损害行政救济法律机制研究”(项目编号:16SKGH007)
【分类号】：D922.68;D925.1

【相似文献】