环境损害赔偿立法模式研究
发布时间:2018-06-10 15:21
本文选题:环境损害赔偿 + 立法模式 ; 参考:《浙江农林大学》2010年硕士论文
【摘要】: 环境损害赔偿立法模式是环境损害赔偿立法由理论形态上升为规范形态并作用于实践的关键。我国环境损害赔偿立法模式存在着一定的缺陷,不仅表现为结构上的不完整,而且在一些相关制度设计上存在大量空白,且现有的规范性文件也存在着大量冲突和不协调现象。在这种背景下,对我国环境损害赔偿立法模式的探讨,选择一个适合的模式使环境损害赔偿立法付诸成文,成为环境损害赔偿立法需要解决的关键问题,并且对于促进环境法律部门地位的加强、学科体系的形成以及法律价值的实现具有重要意义。 文章在分析了环境侵权、环境侵害及与环境损害三个概念之间的关系后,首先从立法内容和形式选择的角度,把环境损害赔偿立法模式分为目标模式、结构模式和制度模式三个方面。其次,以结构模式和制度模式为两条主线,从比较法的视角系统的考察了典型国家的环境损害赔偿立法模式,并对专门型、分散型、部门型、法典专章式等四种具体的立法模式类型进行比较。再次,文章系统的分析了我国环境损害赔偿立法分散式结构模式的缺陷,并就学者关于环境损害赔偿立法模式选择的相关学术观点作了深入的评析。最后,从环境侵权损害的内在属性、环境法体系的协调性和一致性的内在要求,以及解决日益严峻的环境污染事故、为受害人的环境权益提供法律救济、顺应国际环境损害赔偿立法模式的发展趋势等方面,详细论证我国当前环境损害赔偿立法模式选择的理论基础和现实依据,指出我国环境损害赔偿立法在结构模式上应选择相对集中式专门立法,即分别集中制定专门的环境纠纷程序法和环境损害赔偿实体法;在制度模式方面引入损害赔偿的社会化制度、环境损害赔偿基金制度以及惩罚性赔偿制度等,并以此为基础建立完善的环境损害赔偿法律体系。
[Abstract]:The legislative model of environmental damage compensation is the key for the legislation of environmental damage compensation to change from theoretical form to normative form and act on practice. There are some defects in the legislative model of environmental damage compensation in China, which is not only the structural incompleteness, but also a large number of gaps in the design of some related systems, and a large number of conflicts and incoordination in the existing normative documents. Under this background, this paper discusses the legislative model of environmental damage compensation in our country, and chooses a suitable model to make the legislation of environmental damage compensation put into writing, which becomes the key problem that needs to be solved in the legislation of environmental damage compensation. And it is of great significance to promote the strengthening of the position of environmental law department, the formation of discipline system and the realization of legal value. After analyzing the relationship among the three concepts of environmental tort, environmental infringement and environmental damage, the paper analyzes the relationship among the three concepts: environmental tort, environmental infringement and environmental damage. Firstly, from the angle of legislative content and form selection, the legislative model of environmental damage compensation is divided into three aspects: target model, structure model and system mode. Secondly, taking the structural model and the institutional model as the two main lines, this paper systematically investigates the legislative models of environmental damage compensation in typical countries from the perspective of comparative law, and makes a systematic study on the special, decentralized and sectoral models. Four specific legislative models are compared. Thirdly, the article systematically analyzes the defects of the decentralized structure model of the legislation of environmental damage compensation in China, and makes an in-depth analysis of the scholars' academic views on the choice of the legislative model of environmental damage compensation. Finally, from the inherent attribute of the environmental tort damage, the inherent requirement of the coordination and consistency of the environmental law system, and the solution of the increasingly serious environmental pollution accident, providing legal relief for the environmental rights and interests of the victims. In accordance with the development trend of the international environmental damage compensation legislative model, this paper demonstrates in detail the theoretical basis and practical basis for the selection of the current environmental damage compensation legislative model in China. It is pointed out that the legislation of environmental damage compensation in our country should choose the relatively centralized special legislation, that is, the special procedural law of environmental dispute and the substantive law of compensation for environmental damage. In the aspect of system model, the socialization system of damages, the system of environmental damage compensation fund and the system of punitive damages are introduced, and a perfect legal system of environmental damage compensation is established on the basis of this system.
【学位授予单位】:浙江农林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2010
【分类号】:D922.68
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 李艳芳;关于制定《环境损害赔偿法》的思考[J];法学杂志;2005年02期
2 余敏;建立环境责任保险制度的价值分析[J];经济与管理研究;2005年05期
3 蔡守秋,海燕;也谈对环境的损害——欧盟《预防和补救环境损害的环境责任指令》的启示[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2005年03期
4 徐祥民;邓一峰;;环境侵权与环境侵害——兼论环境法的使命[J];法学论坛;2006年02期
5 庄敬华;德国环境损害赔偿法律问题初探[J];法学论坛;2005年05期
6 王灿发;环境损害赔偿立法框架和内容的思考[J];法学论坛;2005年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前4条
1 宋海鸥;环境侵权损害赔偿社会化制度研究[D];重庆大学;2006年
2 高扬;我国行政程序法模式选择与立法建构[D];南京理工大学;2004年
3 杨瑞英;惩罚性赔偿在环境侵权责任中的适用研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年
4 赖中茂;紧急状态法立法模式研究[D];中国政法大学;2004年
,本文编号:2003676
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2003676.html