我国环境侵权民事司法中的利益衡量研究
发布时间：2018-10-18 19:22
【摘要】： 利益衡量是常用的司法方法之一,美国和日本等国家环境侵权民事司法中的利益衡量运用较好且积累了很多有益经验,国内环境法学界对环境侵权民事司法中利益衡量问题的研究较少,而我国相关司法实践急需理论指导。对我国环境侵权民事司法中的利益衡量问题进行研究需要解决以下一些基本理论问题:①“利益衡量”在何种背景下出现的?利益衡量的含义是什么?环境侵权民事司法中的利益衡量有何独特性?②从比较法层面来看,环境侵权民事司法中利益衡量运用较好的国家,如美国、日本,有哪些有益的经验?③我国环境侵权民事司法中的利益衡量有何缺陷?④如何完善我国环境侵权民事司法中的利益衡量?等等。 文章采用比较分析、案例分析、逻辑推理、规范分析、经济分析、语义分析、历史分析、实证分析等方法对上述问题进行了初浅的探讨,阐述了利益衡量出现的背景,辨析了与利益衡量有关的不同称谓,重新界定了利益衡量的概念,分析了环境侵权民事司法中利益衡量的独特性,考察了美国和日本环境侵权民事司法中利益衡量的经验,分析了我国环境侵权民事司法中利益衡量的问题,认为我国法官处理环境案件时存在有如法官应用利益衡量的宏观思维定位不佳、忽视经济效率分析思维的运用等问题,针对这些问题,在借鉴美国和日本相关经验的基础上,提出了完善我国环境侵权民事司法利益衡量的建议。
[Abstract]:Interest measurement is one of the commonly used judicial methods. In the civil justice of environmental tort such as the United States and Japan, the interest measurement is well used and has accumulated a lot of useful experience. There is little research on the measurement of interests in environmental tort civil justice in domestic environmental law circles, but the relevant judicial practice in our country is in urgent need of theoretical guidance. To study the problem of interest measurement in the civil justice of environmental tort in China, we need to solve the following basic theoretical problems: (1) under what background does "interest measurement" occur? What is the meaning of interest measurement? What is the uniqueness of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice? (2) from the perspective of comparative law, the countries that use better interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice, such as the United States and Japan, What are the beneficial experiences? (3) what are the shortcomings of the interest measurement in the environmental tort civil justice in China? 4. How to perfect the interest measurement in the environmental tort civil justice in our country? Wait This paper discusses the above problems by means of comparative analysis, case analysis, logical reasoning, normative analysis, economic analysis, semantic analysis, historical analysis and empirical analysis, and expounds the background of interest measurement. This paper analyzes the different appellations related to interest measurement, redefines the concept of interest measurement, analyzes the uniqueness of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice, and examines the experience of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice in the United States and Japan. This paper analyzes the problems of interest measurement in the civil justice of environmental tort in our country, and points out that there are some problems in our country's judges' handling of environmental cases, such as the poor positioning of macroscopic thinking of judges' application of interest measurement, the neglect of the use of economic efficiency analysis thinking, and so on. In view of these problems, based on the relevant experiences of the United States and Japan, this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the measurement of the civil judicial interests of environmental tort in China.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D922.68;D923
本文编号：2280128
[Abstract]:Interest measurement is one of the commonly used judicial methods. In the civil justice of environmental tort such as the United States and Japan, the interest measurement is well used and has accumulated a lot of useful experience. There is little research on the measurement of interests in environmental tort civil justice in domestic environmental law circles, but the relevant judicial practice in our country is in urgent need of theoretical guidance. To study the problem of interest measurement in the civil justice of environmental tort in China, we need to solve the following basic theoretical problems: (1) under what background does "interest measurement" occur? What is the meaning of interest measurement? What is the uniqueness of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice? (2) from the perspective of comparative law, the countries that use better interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice, such as the United States and Japan, What are the beneficial experiences? (3) what are the shortcomings of the interest measurement in the environmental tort civil justice in China? 4. How to perfect the interest measurement in the environmental tort civil justice in our country? Wait This paper discusses the above problems by means of comparative analysis, case analysis, logical reasoning, normative analysis, economic analysis, semantic analysis, historical analysis and empirical analysis, and expounds the background of interest measurement. This paper analyzes the different appellations related to interest measurement, redefines the concept of interest measurement, analyzes the uniqueness of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice, and examines the experience of interest measurement in environmental tort civil justice in the United States and Japan. This paper analyzes the problems of interest measurement in the civil justice of environmental tort in our country, and points out that there are some problems in our country's judges' handling of environmental cases, such as the poor positioning of macroscopic thinking of judges' application of interest measurement, the neglect of the use of economic efficiency analysis thinking, and so on. In view of these problems, based on the relevant experiences of the United States and Japan, this paper puts forward some suggestions to improve the measurement of the civil judicial interests of environmental tort in China.
【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D922.68;D923
【引证文献】
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 杨欢;我国水污染侵权民事救济制度研究[D];南昌大学;2010年
2 周锐;从环境法理念看环境司法中法官的法律解释[D];湖南师范大学;2011年
3 蒋文玉;利益衡量方法在我国环境侵权案件中的适用研究[D];西南政法大学;2011年
，本文编号：2280128
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2280128.html
