当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 环境法论文 >

中国林权制度变迁研究

发布时间:2018-10-18 20:15
【摘要】:从发展观的变迁出发,深入探讨国际上普遍认可的可持续发展理论,可持续发展理论为中国林权制度的发展提供了方向,为林业的持续发展提供了理论支持。以可持续发展理论、产权理论、制度变迁理论为基础,深层次发掘林权制度的理论内涵,揭示林权制度安排的本质渊源,丰富中国林权制度变迁理论。 林业的可持续发展是中国经济社会可持续发展战略中的重要组成部分,实践与理论证明,林权制度的合理安排对林业的可持续发展起着关键和核心的作用。正确看待林权制度变迁的各个历史阶段对当前林权制度的安排有着很好的借鉴作用,因为,任何政策、法规都不是突如其来的,政策之间具有延续性与承继性,林权制度也不例外。回顾林权制度的变迁史,不难发现林权制度的变迁都是为了更好地保护和实现其经济价值,满足利益相关者的诉求,这就忽视了林业的其他效益。对各个阶段林权制度进行客观评析后,发现社会各界对林权制度变迁中的林业“三定”阶段存在一些误解,普遍认为林业“三定”违背了林权制度改革的初衷,没有顺利实施与完成,造成了不好的政策后果,以林业“三定”作为重点对林权制度改革进行客观公正地评析,找出各个阶段林权制度改革的可持续性以及不合理性,林权制度改革经过曲折的发展终于找到林业发展的正确路径。并得出结论:一、林权制度的变迁要随着社会的发展而发展,与社会发展相和谐,不断适应社会发展的新变化和新要求。二、林业“三定”的历史地位不容忽视,林业“三定”各项政策顺利完成后却没有同社会的发展同步改进,也没有与中国特殊的林情相适应,才会出现政策同林业实际经营的矛盾,让社会各界产生误解,不能正确的对待它,我们要汲取经验摒弃教训。三、正确看待林权制度变迁中的困难和失败,任何制度的产生都不是一帆风顺的,在各种因素的制约下,林权制度改革必定会伴随着曲折而成长,我们应该正视问题,并解决这些问题,而不是否定它,就像看待林业“三定”一样。 在上述结论的基础上,总结林权制度改革的成效并提出了些许建议,以可持续发展理念带动林业的持续发展,林权制度改革的道路虽然还很漫长,可能还会遇到很多挫折,但随着林权制度改革的继续深化,林业建设的可持续发展必将修成正果,我们对林权制度改革充满期盼,充满信心。
[Abstract]:Based on the change of the concept of development, this paper probes into the theory of sustainable development which is generally accepted in the world. The theory of sustainable development provides a direction for the development of Chinese forest tenure system and provides theoretical support for the sustainable development of forestry. Based on the theory of sustainable development, the theory of property right and the theory of institutional change, this paper explores the theoretical connotation of the forest right system, reveals the essential origin of the arrangement of the forest right system, and enriches the theory of the change of the forest right system in China. The sustainable development of forestry is an important part of the sustainable development strategy of Chinese economy and society. The practice and theory prove that the rational arrangement of forest right system plays a key and core role in the sustainable development of forestry. The correct treatment of the historical stages of the change of forest tenure system has a good reference to the arrangement of the current forest tenure system, because no policy or regulation comes out of the blue, and there is continuity and inheritance between the policies. Forest right system is no exception. It is not difficult to find that the change of forest tenure system is to better protect and realize its economic value and satisfy the demands of stakeholders, which ignores the other benefits of forestry. After an objective analysis of the forest property right system in various stages, it is found that there are some misunderstandings about the forestry "three definite" stage in the forest tenure system change, and it is generally believed that the forestry "three definite" system violates the original intention of the forest property right system reform. The failure of the successful implementation and completion of the forest property right system has resulted in bad policy consequences. Taking the forestry "three determinations" as the focus, the paper evaluates the forest tenure system reform objectively and impartially, and finds out the sustainability and irrationality of the forest property right system reform in each stage. The reform of forest property right system has finally found the correct path of forestry development after tortuous development. The main conclusions are as follows: first, the change of forest right system should develop with the development of society, be harmonious with social development, and adapt to the new changes and requirements of social development. Second, the historical status of the forestry "three determinations" cannot be ignored. After the successful completion of the forestry "three decisions" policies, however, they have not improved synchronously with the development of society, nor have they been adapted to the special forest conditions of China. Only then will there appear the contradiction between the policy and the actual management of forestry, which will lead to misunderstandings in all walks of life of the society and will not treat it correctly, so we should learn from the experience and abandon the lessons. Third, correctly look at the difficulties and failures in the change of forest property right system, and the emergence of any system is not smooth. Under the restriction of various factors, forest right system reform will surely grow with twists and turns. We should face the problem squarely. And solve these problems, rather than negate it, just like the forestry "three certainty." On the basis of the above conclusions, this paper summarizes the effect of forest tenure system reform and puts forward some suggestions. The sustainable development of forestry is promoted by the concept of sustainable development. Although the road of forest tenure system reform is still long, it may encounter many setbacks. However, with the deepening of the reform of forest property right system, the sustainable development of forestry construction will surely become a positive result. We are full of expectation and confidence in the reform of forest property right system.
【学位授予单位】:西北农林科技大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:D922.63;F326.2

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 ;Compensation for forest ecological services in China[J];Forestry Studies in China;2007年01期

2 徐永慧;;以可持续发展理念推进我国林业生态工程建设[J];北方经贸;2009年05期

3 周中林;李大川;;从低碳经济发展的角度审视中国集体林权制度的改革[J];经济研究导刊;2011年03期

4 文振军;美国林业持续发展的经验和启示[J];林业科技管理;2002年03期

5 陈幸良;新时期深化林业产权制度改革的研究[J];林业科技管理;2003年02期

6 韩素梅;可持续发展和森林可持续经营[J];辽宁林业科技;2001年03期

7 陈根长;;中国林业物权制度研究[J];林业经济;2002年10期

8 戴广翠;徐晋涛;王月华;谢晨;王郁;;中国集体林产权现状及安全性研究[J];林业经济;2002年11期

9 贾治邦;;集体林权制度改革给我们的几点启示[J];林业经济;2006年06期

10 杨喜军;;推进林权制度改革 实现国有林区全面协调可持续发展[J];林业经济;2007年09期



本文编号:2280249

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2280249.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户3d9a6***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com