环境法律观检讨
发布时间:2018-12-11 05:33
【摘要】:当前环境法学表象繁荣的背后隐藏着专业性不强的危机,其根源在于较为落后的法律观。在一些环境法理论中作为言说基础和前提预设的"法"与作为现代法治基础的"法"存在较大差异,具体表现为法律道德主义色彩浓厚、与科学规律界限不明、主体性缺失、孤立立法、与传统法的关系失当五个方面。法律观偏失的环境法学研究在实践中只起到思想启蒙的作用,无助于环境法治的实现。要想获得理论提升和实践突破,环境法学必须对自己的核心任务和研究范围作出准确定位,牢牢把握法的本质特征,加强本土化研究,尊重现行法,采取现实主义思维,实现向法学的回归。
[Abstract]:At present, behind the appearance prosperity of environmental law, there is a crisis that is not professional, and its root lies in the relatively backward legal view. In some environmental law theories, there are great differences between "law" and "law", which are the presupposition of speech and premise, which are the basis of modern rule of law, which are manifested in the strong color of legal morality, unclear boundaries with scientific laws, and lack of subjectivity. The relationship between isolated legislation and traditional law is wrong in five aspects. The study of environmental law, which is partial to the legal view, only plays the role of ideological enlightenment in practice, and is not helpful to the realization of environmental rule of law. If we want to get a breakthrough in theory and practice, environmental law must make an accurate orientation to its core task and research scope, firmly grasp the essential characteristics of law, strengthen the study of localization, respect the current law, and adopt realistic thinking. To realize the return to law.
【作者单位】: 浙江工商大学法学院;
【分类号】:D912.6
[Abstract]:At present, behind the appearance prosperity of environmental law, there is a crisis that is not professional, and its root lies in the relatively backward legal view. In some environmental law theories, there are great differences between "law" and "law", which are the presupposition of speech and premise, which are the basis of modern rule of law, which are manifested in the strong color of legal morality, unclear boundaries with scientific laws, and lack of subjectivity. The relationship between isolated legislation and traditional law is wrong in five aspects. The study of environmental law, which is partial to the legal view, only plays the role of ideological enlightenment in practice, and is not helpful to the realization of environmental rule of law. If we want to get a breakthrough in theory and practice, environmental law must make an accurate orientation to its core task and research scope, firmly grasp the essential characteristics of law, strengthen the study of localization, respect the current law, and adopt realistic thinking. To realize the return to law.
【作者单位】: 浙江工商大学法学院;
【分类号】:D912.6
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 汪劲;中国环境法学研究的现状与问题——1998—2003年中国环境法学研究状况调查报告[J];法律科学-西北政法学院学报;2005年04期
2 孙笑侠;法律家的技能与伦理[J];法学研究;2001年04期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 江雁飞 ,陆广泉 ,孟庆保;浅探检察机关在刑事诉讼中保障被害人权益问题[J];安徽电力职工大学学报;2002年02期
2 季学好;;论康德的善良意志[J];安徽电气工程职业技术学院学报;2006年02期
3 侯保疆;市场化视角下的政府公共服务职能运作[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年01期
4 方赛迎;;人性维度的纳税人权利法律保护新探[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2006年03期
5 奚坚平,王成明,刘珠;论我国行政强制执行模式的重构[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2004年03期
6 李伯华;曾菊新;;农村公共物品供给多元化研究——以江汉平原农村饮水安全为例[J];安徽农业大学学报(社会科学版);2006年05期
7 戴兆国;马克思伦理精神的现代性审视[J];安徽师范大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年02期
8 张,
本文编号:2371972
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2371972.html