中国古代环境保护法制通考——以土地制度变革为基本线索
发布时间:2019-04-01 14:27
【摘要】:将土地制度与环境保护法律制度联系起来,并结合目前存世的各类古籍,可以证明:中国古代环境保护法制经历了从西周时期相对完备到明清时期极度衰弱的演变过程,推动力则是土地所有制变革。秦汉时期封建土地所有制兴起,西周时期与土地原始国有制相适应的环保法制体系开始解体;隋唐时期,新的功能被弱化的环保法制基本成型;明清时期,与高度发达的封建土地私有制相适应,环保法制已经被极度"虚化"。
[Abstract]:Linking the land system with the legal system of environmental protection, and combining the ancient books of the present world, it can be proved that the legal system of environmental protection in ancient China experienced the evolution from the relatively complete period of the Western Zhou Dynasty to the extremely weak period of the Ming and Qing dynasties. The driving force is the change of land ownership. The feudal land ownership arose in Qin and Han dynasties, the environmental protection legal system adapted to the original state ownership of land began to disintegrate in the Western Zhou Dynasty, the new function was basically formed in the Sui and Tang dynasties, and the environmental protection legal system was basically formed in the Sui and Tang dynasties. In Ming and Qing dynasties, with the highly developed private ownership of feudal land, environmental protection legal system has been extremely "virtual".
【作者单位】: 重庆大学法学院;
【分类号】:D922.68;D929
[Abstract]:Linking the land system with the legal system of environmental protection, and combining the ancient books of the present world, it can be proved that the legal system of environmental protection in ancient China experienced the evolution from the relatively complete period of the Western Zhou Dynasty to the extremely weak period of the Ming and Qing dynasties. The driving force is the change of land ownership. The feudal land ownership arose in Qin and Han dynasties, the environmental protection legal system adapted to the original state ownership of land began to disintegrate in the Western Zhou Dynasty, the new function was basically formed in the Sui and Tang dynasties, and the environmental protection legal system was basically formed in the Sui and Tang dynasties. In Ming and Qing dynasties, with the highly developed private ownership of feudal land, environmental protection legal system has been extremely "virtual".
【作者单位】: 重庆大学法学院;
【分类号】:D922.68;D929
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 吴宏岐;隋唐时期对西部地区的经营开发及启示[J];中国历史地理论丛;2002年02期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 史念海;;隋唐时期重要的自然环境的变迁及其与人为作用的关系[A];唐史论丛(第五辑)[C];1990年
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 沈晋贤;从巫祝用“土”到以“土”为药论——兼论马王堆医书巫祝用土[J];安徽大学学报;2004年06期
2 刘信芳;;古文字歧读释例[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2008年05期
3 张振谦;;齐系陶文考释[J];安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期
4 刘洋;;汉代“不道”罪考论[J];安徽教育学院学报;2006年04期
5 马育良;;六安双墩一号汉墓墓主考[J];合肥师范学院学报;2008年04期
6 刘晓满;卜宪群;;秦汉行政中的效率规定与问责[J];安徽史学;2012年02期
7 陈晶;;对秦简中赀甲盾缴纳形式的再认识[J];安徽文学(下半月);2008年02期
8 刘莉;;论《包山楚简》133号简文“诰”字的改释[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2012年02期
9 杨宗兵;里耶秦简县“守”、“丞”、“守丞”同义说[J];北方论丛;2004年06期
10 于,
本文编号:2451635
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2451635.html