论专家证据在环境污染犯罪认定中的功能
发布时间：2019-04-04 10:02
【摘要】：环境犯罪作为一种新型的犯罪,较之传统的犯罪类型认定面临着一些科技难题,其中最突出的是环境犯罪中因果关系判断的困难。目前世界各国的主流做法是将疫学因果关系原则应用于环境犯罪认定过程中,通过专家证据来证明环境污染犯罪的成立与否。因而,专家证据的采信常常是定案的关键所在。然而,由于复杂系统的科学模糊性特征,专家证据需要与公众意见相沟通,并通过一些证据规则对其进行规制,只有这样才能排除公众的合理怀疑并达到法官内心确信。
[Abstract]:As a new type of crime, environmental crime faces some difficult problems in science and technology compared with traditional crime types, among which the most prominent is the difficulty of judging causality in environmental crime. At present, the main practice in the world is to apply the causation principle of epidemic science to the identification of environmental crime, and to prove whether the crime of environmental pollution is established or not by expert evidence. Therefore, the acceptance of expert evidence is often the key to the final case. However, due to the scientific fuzziness of the complex system, expert evidence needs to communicate with the public opinion and regulate it through some rules of evidence. Only in this way can the reasonable suspicion of the public be eliminated and the judge's inner belief can be reached.
【作者单位】： 桂林电子科技大学法学院;重庆大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(11XFX002)
【分类号】：D922.68;D924
本文编号：2453708
[Abstract]:As a new type of crime, environmental crime faces some difficult problems in science and technology compared with traditional crime types, among which the most prominent is the difficulty of judging causality in environmental crime. At present, the main practice in the world is to apply the causation principle of epidemic science to the identification of environmental crime, and to prove whether the crime of environmental pollution is established or not by expert evidence. Therefore, the acceptance of expert evidence is often the key to the final case. However, due to the scientific fuzziness of the complex system, expert evidence needs to communicate with the public opinion and regulate it through some rules of evidence. Only in this way can the reasonable suspicion of the public be eliminated and the judge's inner belief can be reached.
【作者单位】： 桂林电子科技大学法学院;重庆大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目(11XFX002)
【分类号】：D922.68;D924
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 刘超;林亚真;;环境侵权诉讼中损害认定的困境与争议[J];湖北行政学院学报;2010年02期
，本文编号：2453708
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/huanjingziyuanfa/2453708.html
