论我国离婚后抚养请求权制度的完善

发布时间：2018-01-04 10:19

本文关键词：论我国离婚后抚养请求权制度的完善　出处：《湖南师范大学》2011年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：离婚后夫妻扶养制度,即离婚后经济将陷入困难或无过错的夫妻一方,对于有能力提供援助的另一方,可以请求某种形式的援助制度。在世界各国及我国港澳台地区均已形成较为完善的法律制度,有其存在的社会价值和意义。我国现行《婚姻法》所确立的离婚“适当帮助”制度,由于定性模糊,适用条件苛刻,具体制度的缺位以及不周延等立法缺陷,在理论和实践中备受争议,未能充分发挥其应有的作用。应当结合比较法研究和有关司法实践,从扶养请求权的条件、期限、扶养费给付的标准、方式,扶养的限制、丧失等方面进行立法完善。以使该项制度的内容更趋合理,更符合保护婚姻当事人格平等和离婚自由的精神。本文首先从探讨离婚后扶养制度的含义着手,介绍离婚后扶养的立法沿革、发展脉络,分析了离婚后扶养制度的含义、价值,以求对该制度有全面、正确的认识。其次从司法实践的角度,通过相关真实案例的列举,提出该制度在实践中应用面小、扶养标准低的现状,以理性的角度揭示该制度在我国目前司法实践中存在的问题。接下来从三部分通过就离婚后扶养权的适用条件、限制与丧失情形、给付的范围和标准比较我国与德国相关立法规定的差异,指出我国在这些方面制度设定的不足,进而提出相关完善的建议。
[Abstract]:After the divorce, marital maintenance system, namely the divorce economy will fall into difficulties or no fault of one of the spouses, have the ability to provide assistance for the other party may request some form of aid system. Countries in the world and China's Hong Kong and Macao regions have formed the legal system more perfect, has its social value and the establishment of China's current significance. "Marriage law" divorce "proper help" system, the application of fuzzy qualitative, harsh conditions, lack of specific system and undistributed legislative defects, controversial in theory and practice, failed to fully play its due role. It should combine the study of comparative law and related judicial practice the term, from the right to maintenance conditions, alimony payment standards, maintenance and other aspects of the loss limit, the perfection of legislation. In order to make the system more reasonable content, more in line with the protection of the parties to the marriage The spirit of equality and freedom of divorce.
This paper starts with the meaning of the support system after divorce, introduces the legislative evolution and development context of the post divorce support, and analyzes the meaning and value of the support system after divorce, so as to have a comprehensive and correct understanding of the system.
Secondly, from the perspective of judicial practice, through the enumeration of relevant real cases, this paper puts forward the status quo of this system in practice, and the low standard of support, and reveals the existing problems in judicial practice in China from a rational perspective.
Next, from the three part, we compare the conditions of application, limitation and loss, the scope and standard of payment after divorce, compare the differences between China and Germany, point out the shortcomings of our system in these aspects, and then put forward some related suggestions.

【学位授予单位】：湖南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2011
【分类号】：D923.9

【引证文献】