旅行社的安全保障义务及责任

发布时间：2018-02-16 19:18

本文关键词： 旅行社安全保障义务责任竞合　出处：《兰州大学》2010年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】： 近年来,随着生活水平的提高,选择外出旅游的人越来越多,从而促进了旅游行业的迅猛发展。然而在旅游过程中难免会发生的意外事故,往往会给游客带来财产损失,甚至会危及到游客的生命健康。这就涉及到游客与旅行社的旅游纠纷,特别是在纠纷发生后,旅行社与旅游营业机构往往相互推诿责任,导致游客的合法权益得不到及时的维护。各地法院在处理有关旅游纠纷时,对于同一类型的纠纷做出的处理往往不同,甚至相互矛盾。这对我国旅游业的发展是很不利的。旅行社对旅游者的安全保障有什么义务?当旅游者遭受损害时旅行社要承担什么责任?这是本文涉及的主要问题。本文通过分析陈淑玲诉西南旅行社一案,论述了旅行社安全保障义务的性质、内容以及责任形式,笔者对此作出细致的分析和阐述,以期对我国的旅游立法尽微薄之力。本文共分为五部分：引言部分分析了陈淑玲诉西南旅行社一案,简要地说明了安全保障义务的重要性。第二部分：主要介绍旅行社安全保障义务的性质和内容,笔者认为旅行社安全保障义务以法定义务为原则,以约定义务为例外。第三部分：旅行社违反安全保障义务的责任形式,主要有直接责任、替代责任和补充责任三种形式。第四部分：旅行社违反安全保障义务时的责任竞合问题,重点是责任竞合时请求权的选择问题。结论部分：重申了旅行社安全保障义务的重要性。
[Abstract]:In recent years, with the improvement of living standards, more and more people choose to go out to travel, thus promoting the rapid development of the tourism industry. It may even endanger the life and health of tourists. This involves tourism disputes between tourists and travel agencies, especially when disputes arise, when travel agencies and tourism agencies often shirk their responsibilities. As a result, the legitimate rights and interests of tourists cannot be safeguarded in a timely manner. When local courts deal with tourism disputes, they often deal with the same type of disputes differently. Even contradictory. This is very unfavorable to the development of tourism in China. What are the obligations of travel agencies to the safety and security of tourists? What is the liability of the travel agency when the tourist suffers damage? This is the main problem involved in this paper. By analyzing the case of Chen Shu-ling v. Southwest Travel Service, this paper discusses the nature, content and responsibility form of the travel agency's duty of safety guarantee. The author makes a detailed analysis and elaboration of this case in order to make a modest contribution to the tourism legislation of our country. This paper is divided into five parts:. The introduction analyzes Chen Shu-ling v. Southwest Travel Service, and briefly explains the importance of security obligations. The second part mainly introduces the nature and content of travel agency's security obligation. The author thinks that travel agency's duty of safety and security is based on the principle of legal obligation, with the exception of contractual obligation. The third part: there are three kinds of liability forms: direct liability, substitute liability and supplementary liability. Part 4th: the problem of the concurrence of liability when the travel agency violates the obligation of safety guarantee, with emphasis on the choice of the right of claim when the liability is competing. Conclusion: the importance of travel agency security obligation is reiterated.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2010
【分类号】：D923.9

【引证文献】