论持股配偶擅自转让名下股权的效力

发布时间：2018-03-02 21:53

本文选题：夫妻关系　切入点：持股配偶　出处：《西南政法大学》2016年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：司法审判的“公平正义”价值,很大程度体现在审判者审理案件的“中立性”,而这种“中立性”则体现在审理标准及判决结果的“标准化”上。对于因夫妻一方(持股配偶)未经另一方(非持股配偶)的同意,擅自转让婚姻关系存续期间以夫妻共同财产投资所得的股权而引发另一方(非持股配偶)维权的纠纷,由于现阶段我国《婚姻法》对于夫妻共同财产以及共同财产处分的规定与《公司法》关于股权转让的规定,存在一定程度的立法“空白”,而立法层面的“空白”则导致这类纠纷在司法实务中难以达成审判共识,在不同的法院或不同的审判人员之间形成“有效论”与“无效论”两种截然不同的审判思路。本文通过结合我国现阶段的法律框架、司法实务以及相关的法学理论,在分析有关问题和借鉴前人的研究成果上,对“持股配偶擅自转让名下股权的效力问题”进行探讨,以期总结出统一的审判思路,破解此类纠纷中现阶段“同案不同判”的司法困境。除引言、结语部分,本文主要分为四大部分,主要内容如下:第一部分系对本文所探讨问题的提出。文章首先对两个案情高度相似(主要是法律关系高度相似)的案例分别作概述,展示现阶段司法实务中对“持股配偶擅自转让名下股权的效力问题”所出现的“同案不同判”的现象,从而引出本文要讨论的一系列问题。第二部分主要对本文第一个需要探讨的问题——“持股配偶名下股权是否属于夫妻共同财产”进行论述。通过对我国及域外关于“夫妻共同财产”的法律规定进行分析、对公司法学理对股权的法律属性进行分析,从而得出对该问题的认知。第三部分主要对配偶擅自转让名下股权效力认定的司法现状进行分析。首先对司法审判的两种截然不同的认定意见进行描述;尔后对造成该两种审判意见的成因进行分析;最后,通过结合最根本的法学理论,对成因进行进一步的剖析,以期得出造成“同案不同判”最深层的原因。第四部分是全文最重要的部分,系对本专题型论文最中心问题的论述。本文的初衷是破解现阶段我国司法实务对“持股配偶擅自转让名下股权的效力认定”的“同案不同判”现象,通过前三部分的论述,层层递进,在这部分,得出司法实务中解决上述问题的“统一路径”。
[Abstract]:The "fair and just" value of judicial trial, To a large extent, it is reflected in the "neutrality" of the case heard by the adjudicator, and this "neutrality" is reflected in the "standardization" of the standard of adjudication and the result of the judgment. The consent of the spouse of the share, A dispute over the rights of the other party (non-shareholding spouse) arising from the unauthorized transfer of the equity acquired from the joint property investment of the husband and wife during the period of the marriage relationship being transferred without authorization, Because of the provisions of the Marriage Law of our country at the present stage concerning the joint property of the husband and wife and the disposition of the joint property, and the provisions of the Company Law on the transfer of shares, There is a certain degree of legislation "blank", and the legislative level of "blank" will lead to such disputes in judicial practice difficult to reach a common understanding of the trial, In different courts or different judges, there are two different kinds of judicial ideas: "effective theory" and "invalid theory". This paper combines the current legal framework, judicial practice and relevant legal theories of our country. On the basis of analyzing the relevant problems and drawing lessons from the previous research results, this paper probes into the "validity of unauthorized transfer of shareholding spouses' shares in their own names" in order to sum up the unified judicial thinking. To solve the judicial dilemma of "different judgments in the same case" in such disputes at this stage. Apart from the introduction and conclusion, this article is mainly divided into four parts. The main contents are as follows: the first part is about the questions discussed in this paper. Showing the phenomenon of "different judgments of the same case" in the current judicial practice of "the validity of unauthorized transfer of the shareholding spouse's shares in his or her name", This leads to a series of problems to be discussed in this paper. The second part mainly discusses the first question that needs to be discussed in this paper-"whether the shareholding spouse's equity is the joint property of husband and wife". The legal provisions of the "joint property of husband and wife" are analysed, This paper analyzes the legal attribute of stock right in the theory of company law, The third part mainly analyzes the judicial status quo of the validity of the spouse's unauthorized transfer of equity in his or her name. Firstly, it describes the two different opinions of judicial trial. After that, the causes of the two opinions were analyzed. Finally, by combining the most fundamental legal theories, the causes were further analyzed. With a view to finding out the deepest reasons for "different judgements in the same case". Part 4th is the most important part of the full text. The original intention of this paper is to solve the phenomenon of "different judgment in the same case" in the judicial practice of "the validity of the unauthorized transfer of the shareholding spouse's shares in his or her name" at the present stage, through the discussion of the first three parts. Layer by layer, in this part, the judicial practice to solve the above-mentioned problems, the "unified path."
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D922.291.91;D923.9

【相似文献】