生活需要视角下扶养费请求权之实现

发布时间：2018-03-11 08:01

本文选题：扶养　切入点：扶养费请求权　出处：《浙江大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文以生活需要为视角,探讨了扶养费请求权的产生、行使与消灭的问题。全文共分为六个部分,概要如下:第一部分是引言,阐述本文的研究价值并点题。第二部分阐述了扶养费请求权纠纷的司法立场。分别从扶养费请求权的产生、扶养费请求权之诉的权利主体以及扶养费请求权是否适用诉讼时效这三个焦点出发,将司法实践中的扶养费纠纷作了归纳总结。第三部分是针对第二部分判例的反思,抛出生活需要才是扶养费请求权产生的前提这一观点,为下文的论证作铺垫。第四部分是全文的核心。下分三个小点,第一小点论证了生活需要是整个扶养制度建立的起因,并详细阐述了对"生活需要"这一概念的理解;第二小点是结合全文第二部分的判例,从生活需要的视角来解释扶养费请求权行使过程中可能出现的各种法律问题,主要包括扶养费请求权的主体问题、客体问题以及适用诉讼时效与否的问题;第三小点探讨了扶养费请求权消灭的原因,包括当事人死亡、扶养要件消失、身份关系消灭等,以及该等原因背后尚存争议的关于扶养费请求权的法律问题,以保证全文问题探讨逻辑的完整性。第五部分为扶养纠纷的解决提供了相关建议。主要从把握扶养制度与亲属法之间的关系进行了阐述,并针对扶养费纠纷提出了些许裁判对策,同时呼吁我国加紧完善对扶养制度的相关立法,以统一裁判标准。第六部分即结语,顾名思义,为对全文的简要总结。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of life needs, this paper discusses the emergence, exercise and elimination of the right to claim for maintenance. The full text is divided into six parts: the first part is the introduction. The second part expounds the judicial stand of the dispute over the right of claim for maintenance, respectively from the origin of the right of claim for maintenance. Starting from the three focal points of the subject of the right to claim for maintenance and whether the right to claim for maintenance is applicable to the limitation of action, the author summarizes the disputes over maintenance in judicial practice. The third part is the reflection of the second part of the case law. The view that living needs are the premise of the right to claim for maintenance is the foundation for the following argument. Part 4th is the core of the full text. The first point demonstrates that the need for life is the cause of the establishment of the entire maintenance system. And elaborated the understanding of the concept of "living need" in detail. The second little point is to explain various legal problems that may appear in the process of exercising the right of claim for maintenance expenses from the perspective of life needs in the light of the case law in the second part of the paper. It mainly includes the subject, object and the limitation of action. The third point discusses the reasons of the extinguishment of the claim, including the death of the parties, the disappearance of the supporting elements, the elimination of the identity relationship, etc. And the legal issues relating to the right to claim for maintenance that remain in dispute behind those reasons, In order to ensure the integrity of the logic of the full text, part 5th provides relevant suggestions for the settlement of maintenance disputes. It mainly expounds the relationship between the maintenance system and the law of relatives. The author also puts forward some judgment countermeasures against the dispute of maintenance expenses, and appeals to our country to improve the relevant legislation on the maintenance system to unify the judgment standard. 6th is the conclusion, as the name implies, for the brief summary of the full text.
【学位授予单位】：浙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.9

【参考文献】