论身份占有

发布时间：2018-03-11 11:27

本文选题：身份占有　切入点：配偶身份占有　出处：《宁波大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在现代社会，自然人在事实上享有的作为配偶、父母、子女、学生和城市人等身份时在法律上不被承认与保护是常见的现象，享有特定身份关系是某些财产利益实现的基础。这就要求人们认识到事实身份关系存在的事实，而事实身份却在我国法律上得不到应有的保护。因而就会引发笔者的思考，要求必须有形式要件的婚姻法是否能够包含所有的现象？如果不能解决，那是否可以借鉴域外法上的制度来调整规范漏洞？本文写作的主旨是在用更加简单、完善的制度法规来解决上述的问题。本文从四大部分来展开，采用的是总分式的结构，本文主要借鉴身份占有制度，从罗马取得时效制度的法律研究适用于人身法入手，扩展研究了近现代欧美民法人身法的身份占有制度，得出了取得时效制度在人身法上具有可行性的结论，在域外法的基础上研究了身份占有制度在我国可能适用的情形。第一部分从总体上主要介绍了身份占有制度的基本理论。概括提炼了身份占有的内涵，分析认证了身份占有的事实性质，深层挖掘了身份占有的起源，阐述探究了身份占有的功能。第二部分详细介绍了夫妻关系身份占有。从意大利民法典、埃塞俄比亚民法典的身份占有为主线。结合法条来说明身份占有的证明要素有哪些。在此基础上，用刑法与婚姻法关于事实婚的不同态度，婚姻法对于事实婚的否认态度，而刑法上重婚罪中事实婚构成犯罪，两种截然不同的态度引出问题所在。并结合身份占有来解决几种可以适用于夫妻关系的情形。第三部分主要介绍了亲子关系身份占有。分别从魁北克民法典、意大利民法典来介绍。结合法条来阐明亲子关系的身份占有，具体探究事实收养关系，错养等情形，，分析用收养法、继承法等无法解决的情形下，笔者建议适用身份占有来维护已经形成的社会秩序。第四部分从介绍法国民法典的国民身份占有为开始，从另一个视角来看村民身份资格的取得，延伸事实身份占有适用的可能。作为移民城市的农民，作为旁听生分别取得相应的资格适用的情形。尽管这样可能存在不足，但本文为那些深陷混乱现象无法解决的公民提出解决意见。
[Abstract]:In modern society, it is common for natural persons to have de facto status as spouses, parents, children, students and urban people, which are not legally recognized and protected. It requires people to realize the fact that the fact identity relation exists, but the fact identity can not be protected in our country law. Therefore, the author will think about it. Can a marriage law that requires formal elements include all phenomena? If not, can we learn from the system of extraterritorial law to adjust the loopholes? The purpose of this paper is to solve the above problems with more simple and perfect regulations. This paper starts from four parts and adopts the structure of total division. This paper mainly draws lessons from the system of identity possession, and starts with the legal study of the prescription system in Rome, which is applicable to the personal body law. This paper extends the study of the status possession system of the personal status law in modern European and American civil law, and draws the conclusion that the acquisitive prescription system is feasible in the personal status law, and studies the possible application of the status possession system in our country on the basis of the extraterritorial law. The first part mainly introduces the basic theory of identity possession system, summarizes the connotation of identity possession, analyzes the factual nature of identity possession, and excavates the origin of identity possession deeply. This paper expounds the function of identity possession. The second part introduces the marital relationship identity possession in detail. From the Italian Civil Code, Ethiopia Civil Code identity possession as the main line. Combined with the law to explain what the elements of proof of identity possession. On this basis, Using the different attitudes of criminal law and marriage law about de facto marriage, the marriage law denies the de facto marriage, while in the criminal law, the crime of bigamy constitutes a crime. Two very different attitudes raise the problem and combine identity possession to solve several situations that can be applied to a couple. The third part mainly introduces the status possession of parent-child relationship. It is introduced from Quebec Civil Code and Italian Civil Code respectively. In combination with the articles of law, it clarifies the status possession of parent-child relationship, probes into the actual adoptive relationship, misraise and so on. Under the situation that the adoption law and inheritance law can not be solved, the author suggests that identity possession should be applied to maintain the social order that has been formed. The 4th part begins with the introduction of the French Civil Code on the possession of national identity, from another angle of view to see the acquisition of villagers' identity qualifications, and extends the possibility of the application of factual identity possession. Although this may not be sufficient, this paper proposes solutions for those citizens who are mired in chaos.
【学位授予单位】：宁波大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D913

【参考文献】