当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 婚姻法论文 >

同性伴侣权益保护研究

发布时间:2018-03-18 22:42

  本文选题:同性伴侣 切入点:权益保护 出处:《南京师范大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:对于中国的同性伴侣而言,相关法律的缺失和相关问题的出现,这两者的矛盾正在逐渐显现。国内对同性伴侣权益的保护的学界研究也极度贫乏。与之相对的是,国外的同性伴侣权益保护法律进程却在逐渐展开,有的已经形成法律规范,有的也已经提上了立法日程,其范围遍及五大洲。本文试图通过对他国同性伴侣权益保护的模式研究,深入把握西方对人权、平等的理解和这些概念的实质,并且为未来中国的同性伴侣权益保护立法问题搜集资料,更新理念,也希望对现今中国的婚姻家庭法有所贡献。 同性伴侣权益保护这一诉求的出现,引发了诸多关于其必要性的讨论,有学者从法理学、法经济学、法社会学等角度认同其相关价值所在,也有学者从伦理、婚姻本质、未成年人的教育等方面质疑其合理性。目前,存在同性伴侣权益保护制度的国家根据国情、社会意识等的不同,分别采取不同的模式对同性伴侣权益保护进行实践,总结下来包括抛开身份单纯进行个别规制的非婚同居模式,创设婚姻之外的第二种关系保护同性伴侣权益不与婚姻等同的中间模式,以及直接适用现有民法或婚姻家庭法的婚姻模式。三种模式存在不同的社会背景,受社会集体意识的制约程度不同,立法技术和主要内容上也是有所差异。而中国目前相关立法的空白和问题开始出现的现实存在着一定的矛盾。当未来中国可能需要对同性伴侣权益进行保护时,这些实践模式的借鉴作用是不可忽视的。我们可以从中得到先进的理论和丰富的实践经验,从而科学地得出未来中国关于同性伴侣权益保护的模式构建的具体内容。 笔者希望通过对国外关于同性伴侣权益保护的法律、学术资料进行搜集整理,分析整合出条理清晰、趋势鲜明的发展过程,从比较法的角度分析这些在同性伴侣权益保护立法方面比较成熟的国家的相关法律和学术资料,从理论上探讨同性伴侣权益保护的适用条件和要求。当中国发展到需要寻求同性伴侣权益保护的时代,本文能够为其提供一些完整的、系统的资料,有利于理解这种制度的历史发展进程。
[Abstract]:For same-sex couples in China, the lack of relevant laws and the emergence of related problems, the contradiction between the two is gradually emerging. Domestic academic research on the protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples is also extremely poor. However, the legal process of protecting the rights and interests of same-sex couples abroad is gradually unfolding. Some of them have already formed legal norms and some have put them on the legislative agenda. It covers five continents. This paper attempts to understand the western understanding of human rights, equality and the essence of these concepts by studying the model of protecting the rights and interests of same-sex couples in other countries. We also hope to contribute to the marriage and family law in China by collecting data and updating ideas for the future legislation on the protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples in China. The emergence of the demand for the protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples has led to a lot of discussions on its necessity. Some scholars identify with its relevant values from the perspectives of jurisprudence, law and economics, and sociology of law, and some scholars agree on the nature of marriage from the point of view of ethics, marriage, and so on. At present, countries that have a system of protecting the rights and interests of same-sex couples, depending on their national conditions and social consciousness, adopt different models to practice the protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples. The conclusion includes setting aside the non-marital cohabitation mode of individual regulation and creating a second kind of intermediate model to protect the rights and interests of same-sex couples from marriage. And the marriage mode which directly applies to the existing civil law or marriage and family law. The three models have different social backgrounds and are restricted by the social collective consciousness. There are also differences in legislative techniques and main contents. However, there are some contradictions between the gaps in relevant legislation in China and the reality that problems are beginning to arise. When China may need to protect the rights and interests of same-sex couples in the future, We can get advanced theory and rich practical experience from which we can get the concrete contents of the model construction about the protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples in China in the future. The author hopes to collect and sort out the foreign laws and academic materials on the protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples, and to analyze and integrate the development process with a clear and clear trend. From the perspective of comparative law, this paper analyzes the relevant legal and academic data of these countries, which are relatively mature in legislation on the protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples. This paper theoretically discusses the applicable conditions and requirements for the protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples. When China has reached an era when it is necessary to seek the protection of the rights and interests of same-sex couples, this paper can provide it with some complete and systematic information. It is helpful to understand the historical development of this system.
【学位授予单位】:南京师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D923.9

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前5条

1 王森波;;美国加州同性婚姻立法风波透析[J];东方法学;2010年01期

2 ;同性恋者如何维护权益——访婚姻法专家杨大文教授[J];江淮法治;2006年10期

3 周安平;婚姻家庭与人口生育立法分离之探讨[J];华东政法学院学报;1999年05期

4 Kees Waldijk;庄素娟;;欧洲国家同性婚姻立法的发展趋势[J];金陵法律评论;2006年01期

5 邢人俨;;同妻[J];南方人物周刊;2011年36期

相关硕士学位论文 前6条

1 王菁;同性婚姻立法比较研究[D];武汉大学;2005年

2 邵廷娟;法国民事互助契约制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2005年

3 王剑辉;同性婚姻立法研究[D];吉林大学;2007年

4 申月霞;论非婚同居法律规制[D];西南政法大学;2007年

5 孙媛媛;评述美国同性婚姻合法性论争[D];吉林大学;2008年

6 刘冰柔;中国同性结合制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2009年



本文编号:1631619

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/1631619.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4a944***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com