关于亲子关系否认制度若干问题探讨——评析《婚姻法司法解释三》第2条第1款之规定

发布时间：2018-04-04 21:42

本文选题：否认权　切入点：形成诉权　出处：《河北法学》2016年12期

【摘要】：从维护亲子身份关系的安定,实现婚姻、家庭的和谐稳定和未成年子女利益最大化的亲子关系否认制度之立法宗旨出发,认为就否认权主体而言,未来立法宜确立为夫妻双方和成年子女;就否认权之行使所需达到的举证程度而言,须以所举证据是否足以形成合理的链条、达到转移举证责任给另一方当事人为最低标准;就亲子鉴定之强制执行的可行性而言,司法实践宜遵循司法解释三的精神,即能否执行取决于当事人的意愿,不得强制执行;就否认权行使的限制而言,宜根据其形成诉权的性质,承认其受除斥期间的限制;就否认权的行使后果而言,宜承认原婚姻关系存续期间,一方与他人发生性关系而生育子女并隐瞒真情,另一方受欺骗而抚养了非亲生子女,受欺骗方要求返还其在双方离婚后对该非亲生子女给付的抚养费。
[Abstract]:In order to maintain the stability of parent-child identity, realize marriage, family harmony and stability, and maximize the interests of minor children of parent-child denial system of the legislative purposes, think that the denial of the right to the subject,The future legislation should be established as both husband and wife and adult children, and the minimum standard of transferring the burden of proof to the other party must be established by whether the evidence given is sufficient to form a reasonable chain of proof for the exercise of the denial of the right of proof;As far as the feasibility of enforcing paternity testing is concerned, judicial practice should follow the spirit of judicial interpretation three, that is, whether the execution depends on the will of the parties and cannot be enforced; as far as the restriction of the denial of the exercise of the right is concerned,It is advisable to recognize the limitations of the period of exclusion according to the nature of their right of action; and, as far as the consequences of the exercise of the right of denial are concerned, to recognize that, during the existence of the original marital relationship, one party has sexual relations with another person to bear children and conceal the truth,The other party who has been deceived and raised a non-biological child demands the refund of the child's maintenance paid after the divorce between the two parties.
【作者单位】：武汉大学经济与管理学院;
【分类号】：D923.9

【相似文献】