争议可仲裁性理论与实践问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-08 08:19

本文选题：争议 + 可仲裁性　；参考：《中国政法大学》2008年硕士论文

【摘要】： 仲裁作为当今世界各国解决国际商事争议的一项主要的替代性争议解决机制,在与诉讼制度相辅相成的发展过程中,可仲裁性的扩张对仲裁制度的发展壮大起到了主要的推动作用。在仲裁研究中,可仲裁性问题无论在理论上还是实践中都具有基础性的地位,并成为仲裁立法和学术著作中不可或缺的内容。特别是近年来,随着经济的发展,新类型的商事纠纷不断涌现,仲裁在特定的争议领域面临现行立法规制之外的尴尬。目前,在各国积极推动和支持仲裁发展的大背景下,我国需要一个什么样的标准来确立仲裁的范围,并使之适用于我国仲裁实践,成为摆在我们面前一个亟待解决的问题。本文从争议可仲裁性的基础理论问题入手,在借鉴各国立法经验的基础上,充分考虑了新的国际经济形势对可仲裁性判断标准的影响,在理论层面总结出制约可仲裁性判断标准的内外部因素,确立了全新的可仲裁性的判断标准,并将这一标准应用于具体争议领域的分析,最终结合我国立法与实践现状,提出了自己的建议。全文共分五章: 第一章,全面阐述了争议可仲裁性的基础理论,在对争议可仲裁性定义的基础上,通过与相关概念的辨析,厘清了这一概念的内涵外延。介绍了争议可仲裁性的四个特征,提出了研究这一问题的微观及宏观意义。第二章,阐述了确立争议可仲裁性的理论依据。本章主要是对现有仲裁立法和实践经验进行总结,同时考虑到制度本身的发展趋势及这种趋势带来的影响,在理论层面概括总结出影响标准建立的仲裁性质、制度限制两个内部因素,及国家限制和经济社会发展需要的外部因素,从而为构建一种开放而不失精准的规则做好准备。第三章,在依据理论总结的基础上,从主体法律地位平等、所涉实体权益当事人有权自由处分、争议具有可诉性和不影响公共利益四个方面提出有助仲裁发展的可仲裁性标准。第四章,对建立的可仲裁性判断标准进行了实证研究,逐一分析了证券、反垄断、知识产权及破产四个新兴领域的争议类型及特点,用所建立的争议可仲裁性判断标准对这些争议进行了一般性研究和验证,得出了适用仲裁的结论。第五章,立足我国,分析此问题的立法与实践现状,结合国情,对我国反垄断争议、知识产权争议、证券争议和家庭法上的两种特殊争议能否引入仲裁及如何适用可仲裁性判断标准进行了探讨。
[Abstract]:Arbitration, as a major alternative dispute resolution mechanism for solving international commercial disputes in the world today, has played a major role in promoting the development and expansion of the arbitration system in the process of complementary development with the litigation system. In the study of arbitration, the question of arbitrability is both in theory and in practice. Both of them have a basic position and become an indispensable part of the arbitration legislation and academic works. Especially in recent years, with the development of the economy, new types of commercial disputes emerge constantly. Arbitration is facing the embarrassment of the current legislative regulation in the particular field of dispute. At present, the great back of the development of arbitration is actively promoted and supported in various countries. Under the view, what kind of standard is needed to establish the scope of arbitration and to apply it to the practice of arbitration in our country, which has become a problem to be solved in front of us.
This paper, starting with the basic theory of arbitrability of disputes, takes full consideration of the influence of the new international economic situation on the standard of arbitrable judgment on the basis of the experience of various countries, and summarizes the internal and external factors of the arbitrable judgment standard in the theoretical level. First, the standard is applied to the analysis of specific disputes. Finally, it puts forward some suggestions based on the current situation of legislation and practice in China.
The full text is divided into five chapters.
In the first chapter, the basic theory of dispute arbitrability is fully expounded. On the basis of the definition of the arbitrability of the dispute, the connotation and extension of the concept is clarified through the analysis of the related concepts. The four characteristics of the arbitrability of the dispute are introduced, and the micro and macro significance of the study is put forward.
The second chapter expounds the theoretical basis for establishing the arbitrability of the dispute. This chapter mainly summarizes the existing arbitration legislation and practice experience, and takes into account the development trend of the system itself and the influence brought by this trend. In the theoretical level, it summarizes the arbitration nature of the establishment of the influence standards, the system limits two internal factors, and the country. Family constraints and external factors of economic and social development need to be prepared for building an open and precise rule.
The third chapter, on the basis of the theoretical summary, is equal to the legal status of the subject, the parties involved in the substantive rights and interests have the right to dispose of them freely, and the dispute has the four aspects of litigability and no influence on the public interest, and the arbitration standard is put forward to help the development of arbitration.
The fourth chapter makes an empirical study on the arbitration judgment standard established and analyzes the types and characteristics of the disputes in the four emerging fields of securities, antimonopoly, intellectual property and bankruptcy, and makes general research and verification on these disputes by the arbitration judgement standard established by the dispute, and draws the conclusion of the application of arbitration.
The fifth chapter, based on our country, analyzes the present situation of the legislation and practice of this problem, and combines the national conditions, and discusses whether the two special disputes in China's antitrust dispute, intellectual property dispute, securities dispute and family law can be introduced into arbitration and how to apply the arbitration judgment standard.

【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2008
【分类号】：D925.7

【引证文献】