当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 婚姻法论文 >

偏离、异化、矫正:亲属法立法价值取向研究

发布时间:2018-05-11 22:09

  本文选题:亲属法 + 价值取向 ; 参考:《辽宁师范大学》2016年硕士论文


【摘要】:亲属法是规定亲属身份的发生、变更和消灭,以及夫妻、父母子女和其他一定范围的亲属之间身份关系、权利和义务的法律规范的总和。亲属法调整对象包括亲属人身关系和亲属财产关系。国家除了通过制定亲属法来调整上述亲属间的社会关系之外,还向社会传达能够被广泛认同和接受的价值原则和价值追求,因此,亲属法的立法价值取向的选择对于判断一部法律是否是良法,是否能够促进家庭及社会的和谐、稳定起到了重要作用。从这个意义上说,本论文的选题富含理论价值和实践意义。就理论价值而言,对亲属法立法价值取向的梳理和研究,在一定程度上可以弥补对亲属法基本理论重视不够、研究不足的局面。从实践价值层面而言,众所周知,立法价值取向的选择是制定一部法律的首要步骤,正确的立法价值取向不仅关乎一部法律对社会的调整和对人们行为的规范,更对加速我国法治建设的进程以及对社会的和谐、稳定起到了举足轻重的作用。因此,对于亲属法立法价值取向出现的偏离、异化的现状应当引起足够的重视,遏制这种现象的发展和蔓延,更好地协调个人利益和家庭整体利益的相互关系,保证家庭职能的实现,维护家庭的和谐、稳定、幸福,促进社会的和谐稳定、繁荣发展。因此,针对当前亲属法立法价值取向出现的偏差和异化现状进行矫正是十分必要的。基于对1950年、1980年婚姻法立法价值取向的实然状态进行分析,可以看出随着我国社会的不断进步,改革发展的不断深化,每一次婚姻法的变化都是对上一部婚姻法立法价值取向的继承和发展,都以婚姻家庭的和谐、稳定、幸福作为最终的价值目标。结合与亲属法立法价值取向应然状态的对比,可以发现随着我国市场经济的深入发展及社会的快速转型,亲属法的立法价值取向随着三部司法解释的颁布而逐渐发生了一定的偏离和异化,为了达到矫正的目的,不仅要兼顾个体利益与团体利益,而且要恢复对婚姻家庭本质的重视,摒弃规则的物本化和立法的司法化,建立司法解释的审查机制,同时强化亲属法的社会功能,尊重亲属法在民法典中的相对独立性,以此使亲属法的立法价值取向回归到应然的状态,使亲属法发挥应有的作用。
[Abstract]:The law of kinship is the sum of the legal norms that stipulate the occurrence, alteration and elimination of the status of relatives, as well as the relationship, rights and obligations between husband and wife, parents and children and other relatives to a certain extent. The object of the regulation of kinship law includes personal relation and property relationship. In addition to regulating the social relations among the relatives mentioned above, the state conveys to society the principles and pursuit of values that can be widely recognized and accepted. The choice of the legislative value orientation of the relative law plays an important role in judging whether a law is a good law, whether it can promote the harmony and stability of the family and society. In this sense, the topic of this paper is rich in theoretical value and practical significance. As far as the theoretical value is concerned, the research on the legislative value orientation of the relative law can to a certain extent make up for the lack of attention to the basic theory of the relative law and the lack of research. From the aspect of practical value, it is well known that the choice of legislative value orientation is the first step in making a law, and the correct legislative value orientation is not only related to the adjustment of society and the norm of people's behavior by a law. It also plays an important role in accelerating the construction of rule of law and social harmony and stability. Therefore, for the deviation of the legislative value orientation of the relative law, the current situation of alienation should be paid enough attention to, to contain the development and spread of this phenomenon, and to better coordinate the relationship between individual interests and the overall interests of the family. Ensure the realization of family functions, maintain family harmony, stability, happiness, promote social harmony and stability, prosperity and development. Therefore, it is necessary to correct the deviation and alienation of the current legislation value orientation of the relative law. Based on the analysis of the actual status of the legislative value orientation of the marriage law in 1950 and 1980, we can see that with the continuous progress of our society, the reform and development of the continuous deepening, The change of each marriage law is the inheritance and development of the value orientation of the last marriage law legislation, and the ultimate value goal is the harmony, stability and happiness of marriage and family. In combination with the comparison of the legal value orientation of the family law, we can find that with the further development of the market economy and the rapid transformation of the society in our country, With the promulgation of the three judicial interpretations, the legislative value orientation of the law of relatives has gradually deviated and alienated. In order to achieve the purpose of correction, it is necessary not only to give consideration to the interests of individuals and groups, but also to restore the importance of the essence of marriage and family. We should abandon the materialization of rules and legislation, establish a review mechanism of judicial interpretation, strengthen the social function of the law of relatives, and respect the relative independence of the law of relatives in the civil code. In this way, the legislative value orientation of kinship law is returned to its proper state, and the kinship law plays its due role.
【学位授予单位】:辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D923.9

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 余能斌;夏利芬;;试论亲属法的基本属性——兼谈亲属法应否从民法典中独立[J];湖北社会科学;2007年09期

2 周导杰;;对重建亲属法伦理的几点认识[J];四川教育学院学报;2009年05期

3 李洪祥;;我国亲属法应当回归未来民法典[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2011年02期

4 李洪祥;;论我国民法典立法之亲属法体系构建的价值取向[J];社会科学战线;2012年12期

5 范治斌;;论中国亲属法的传统精神特点[J];南昌教育学院学报;2013年08期

6 陈小君;于宁杰;;台湾亲属法评介[J];中南政法学院学报;1990年04期

7 夏锦文;中西亲属法文化的冲突及其对近现代中国的影响[J];南京社会科学;1993年06期

8 曹伊清;;台湾亲属法中妻子法律地位研究[J];南京大学法律评论;1996年01期

9 曹诗权;中国亲属法的法文化源流和形式特点[J];法商研究(中南政法学院学报);1997年03期

10 周子良,李锋;中国近现代亲属法的历史考察及其当代启示[J];山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年06期

相关重要报纸文章 前1条

1 中国人民大学教授杨立新教授;简单与复杂[N];检察日报;2002年

相关硕士学位论文 前9条

1 李冰;偏离、异化、矫正:亲属法立法价值取向研究[D];辽宁师范大学;2016年

2 顾微微;民国亲属法浅探[D];华东政法学院;2005年

3 栗明辉;中国近代亲属法、继承法制定和发展初探[D];中国政法大学;2002年

4 张银丽;《大清民律草案》之亲属法研究[D];郑州大学;2012年

5 朱丽;论我国亲属制度的构建[D];黑龙江大学;2009年

6 范冬梅;我国台湾地区民法亲属编修法述评[D];山东大学;2010年

7 王维佳;我国台湾地区《民法·亲属》的发展及其启示[D];长春工业大学;2013年

8 李刚;南京国民政府《民法·亲属编》研究[D];河南大学;2005年

9 李蓓;完善我国《婚姻法》中亲属制度的立法研究[D];湖南师范大学;2002年



本文编号:1875817

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/1875817.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户c2853***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com