试论婚内强奸行为的定性与立法完善

发布时间：2018-05-31 17:56

本文选题：婚内强奸 + 强奸罪　；参考：《中国政法大学》2006年硕士论文

【摘要】：婚内强奸问题并不是一个新鲜的问题，早在九十年代初，上海青浦县人民法院的一份判决就引发了学术界的一场轩然大波，对于婚内强奸的归罪问题的讨论可谓是如火如荼，十几年来，学界两派各持己见、相持不下，，这种争论也给司法实践带来了困惑，罪与非似乎应该有个定论，然而，今年“三八”前夕，社科学院发布《中国妇女发展报告》披露，在《婚姻法》和《妇女法》修改讨论过程中，“婚内强奸”都是热门话题，但最终两度被弃。由此可见，理论上的争论让立法者难下决心，而立法上的回避却让司法实践仍然面临尴尬，毕竟，司法实践是无法回避这一问题的。特别是今天，妇女解放运动不断发展，越来越多的妇女不再逆来受顺，家庭暴力愈来愈受到社会的关注和重视，婚内强奸早已不是家庭问题而是一个社会问题。本文旨在对婚内强奸行为的概念、社会原因的分析，并利用比较法分析法讨论了域外婚内强奸法的发展，对这种学说的利弊分析，总结出这样的观点：在我国立法上将婚内强奸归罪是必要的和可行的。论文分为四个部分展开论述。我们研究任何一个问题，都必须首先在理论上弄清楚它的基本概念和特征。为了阐述清楚婚内强奸的概念，文章第一部分分别从主客观方面和主客体方面讨论了婚内强奸行为与强奸罪的异同点。在主体上，文章着重讨论了第三人参与是否构成犯罪的问题；客体上，二者是相同的；在主观方面和客观方面，二者是存在差异的。然后文章分析了我国婚内强奸发生的社会原因，分别从历史因素、个体因素、社会因素、法律因素等几个方面进行了分析。文章第二部分主要介绍了国外一些国家和地区关于婚内强奸定性的状况分析，英美法系国家主要介绍了英国和美国的婚内强奸概况，大陆法系国家主要介绍了德国、法国、意大利、俄罗斯以及我国的香港台湾等地的概况。最后通过比较分析，得出的结论是，国外一些国家在婚内强奸的认定这个问题上大概经历了一个从否定到承认的过程，随着诸多国家通过立法承认婚内强奸，这已经成为了国际立法趋势，这不仅是女权运动发展的结果，也是世界妇女人权保障的必然趋势。
[Abstract]:The issue of marital rape is not a new one. As early as the early 1990s, a judgment issued by the Qingpu County people's Court in Shanghai caused a great uproar in the academic community. The discussion on the issue of incrimination of marital rape can be said to be in full swing. For more than a decade, the two schools of academia have held their own views and held each other at loggerheads. This kind of argument has also brought confusion to judicial practice. It seems that there should be a conclusion between crime and non-crime. However, on the eve of "8 March" this year, According to the China Women's Development report released by the Institute of Social Sciences, "marital rape" was a hot topic in the course of the revision and discussion of the Marriage Law and the Women's Law, but was abandoned twice. It can be seen that the theoretical argument makes the legislators difficult to make up their minds, but the legislative avoidance still makes the judicial practice face embarrassment. After all, the judicial practice cannot avoid this problem. Especially today, with the continuous development of the women's liberation movement, more and more women are no longer subject to obedience, and domestic violence has been paid more and more attention by the society. Marital rape is no longer a family problem but a social problem. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the concept and social causes of marital rape, and to discuss the development of marital rape law in foreign countries by means of comparative analysis, and to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of this theory. The conclusion is that it is necessary and feasible to condemn marital rape in Chinese legislation. The thesis is divided into four parts. When we study any problem, we must first understand its basic concepts and characteristics in theory. In order to clarify the concept of marital rape, the first part discusses the similarities and differences between marital rape and rape. On the subject, the article mainly discusses whether the participation of the third party constitutes a crime; the object, the two are the same; in the subjective and objective aspects, there are differences between the two. Then the article analyzes the social causes of marital rape in China, respectively from the historical factors, individual factors, social factors, legal factors and other aspects of the analysis. The second part of the article mainly introduces some foreign countries and regions on marital rape qualitative analysis, Anglo-American law countries mainly introduced the United Kingdom and the United States marital rape, civil law countries mainly introduced Germany, France, An overview of Italy, Russia and Hong Kong and Taiwan. Finally, through comparative analysis, the conclusion is that some foreign countries have probably experienced a process from negation to recognition on the issue of marital rape, with many countries adopting legislation to recognize marital rape. This has become the trend of international legislation, which is not only the result of the development of feminist movement, but also the inevitable trend of the protection of women's human rights in the world.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2006
【分类号】：D923;D924.3

【引证文献】