干扰婚姻关系第三者侵权责任研究
发布时间：2018-07-25 09:19
【摘要】：从社会实践的发展情况来看,社会上第三者以“通奸”、“姘居”和“重婚”行为干扰他人婚姻家庭的现象愈演愈烈,已经严重侵害到婚姻中无过错配偶的合法权益和社会公共秩序。所以,法律是时候该介入道德调整的领域,将此类行为纳入法律体系之中。本文将立足于我国立法和实务现状,运用文献分析、比较分析、个案分析及理论联系实际等方法,从与“第三者”概念和内容相关的理论出发,阐述用法律规范对其规制的合理性以及论述第三者干扰行为的侵权性质。在此基础上结合我国当前立法状况和司法实践来分析我国立法上对于“第三者问题”规定的不足之处,并提出相关建议措施,以此解决“第三者问题”,保护个人合法权益,促进社会健康发展。本文除引言和结语外共分为五个部分。第一部分介绍了涉及第三者干扰他人合法婚姻关系的相关案例,以案例分析来介绍我国“第三者现象”在我国司法实践中的大概发展状况,并以从案例中反映出的与第三者有关的问题引出下文对“第三者干扰他人婚姻关系行为”的讨论。第二部分介绍了对第三者干扰婚姻关系行为性质的认定,通过对“第三者”的界定、第三者干扰他人婚姻行为的种类及其性质分析,以此进一步说明第三者承担侵权责任的合理性。第三部分分析了第三者侵害他人合法婚姻关系侵权责任承担的过错责任归责原则和承担侵权责任的四个构成要件。第四部分介绍了英美法系和大陆法系的一些主要国家的立法和实践情况,以此来分析我国在立法与实务现状中出现的问题。最后一部分是在以上部分的基础上分析我国对无过错配偶的救济困境并提出相应的侵权责任制度构想。
[Abstract]:Judging from the development of social practice, the phenomenon that the third party interferes with the marriage and family of others by "adultery", "concubine" and "bigamy" becomes more and more serious. It has seriously infringed the legal rights and interests of the no-fault spouse in marriage and public order. So it is time for the law to step into the realm of moral adjustment and incorporate such behaviour into the legal system. Based on the present situation of legislation and practice in our country, this paper will apply the methods of literature analysis, comparative analysis, case analysis and the combination of theory and practice, and proceed from the theory related to the concept and content of "third party". This paper expounds the rationality of the regulation by legal norms and the tort nature of the third party interference. On this basis, combined with the current legislative situation and judicial practice of our country, this paper analyzes the deficiencies of the provisions on "third party problems" in our legislation, and puts forward some relevant suggestions, so as to solve "third party problems" and protect the legitimate rights and interests of individuals. To promote the healthy development of society. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into five parts. The first part introduces the related cases involving the third party interfering with the legal marriage relationship of others, and introduces the general development of the third party phenomenon in the judicial practice of our country with the case analysis. The discussion of "the third party's interference in marriage" is given by the third party's problems reflected in the case. The second part introduces the nature of the third party's behavior of interfering with the marriage relationship, through the definition of the "third party", the third party interferes with the other person's marriage behavior, and analyzes the nature of the third party's interference in marriage. In order to further explain the third party to bear the rationality of tort liability. The third part analyzes the principle of liability attribution and the four elements of tort liability. The fourth part introduces the legislation and practice of some major countries in Anglo-American law system and civil law system, so as to analyze the problems in legislation and practice in our country. The last part is based on the above part to analyze the relief predicament of our country to the no-fault spouse and put forward the corresponding conception of tort liability system.
【学位授予单位】：东南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.9
[Abstract]:Judging from the development of social practice, the phenomenon that the third party interferes with the marriage and family of others by "adultery", "concubine" and "bigamy" becomes more and more serious. It has seriously infringed the legal rights and interests of the no-fault spouse in marriage and public order. So it is time for the law to step into the realm of moral adjustment and incorporate such behaviour into the legal system. Based on the present situation of legislation and practice in our country, this paper will apply the methods of literature analysis, comparative analysis, case analysis and the combination of theory and practice, and proceed from the theory related to the concept and content of "third party". This paper expounds the rationality of the regulation by legal norms and the tort nature of the third party interference. On this basis, combined with the current legislative situation and judicial practice of our country, this paper analyzes the deficiencies of the provisions on "third party problems" in our legislation, and puts forward some relevant suggestions, so as to solve "third party problems" and protect the legitimate rights and interests of individuals. To promote the healthy development of society. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into five parts. The first part introduces the related cases involving the third party interfering with the legal marriage relationship of others, and introduces the general development of the third party phenomenon in the judicial practice of our country with the case analysis. The discussion of "the third party's interference in marriage" is given by the third party's problems reflected in the case. The second part introduces the nature of the third party's behavior of interfering with the marriage relationship, through the definition of the "third party", the third party interferes with the other person's marriage behavior, and analyzes the nature of the third party's interference in marriage. In order to further explain the third party to bear the rationality of tort liability. The third part analyzes the principle of liability attribution and the four elements of tort liability. The fourth part introduces the legislation and practice of some major countries in Anglo-American law system and civil law system, so as to analyze the problems in legislation and practice in our country. The last part is based on the above part to analyze the relief predicament of our country to the no-fault spouse and put forward the corresponding conception of tort liability system.
【学位授予单位】：东南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 沈海峰;“强制第三者险”何时现身——“强制第三者险”与“商业第三者险”的区别[J];浙江农村机电;2005年02期
2 ;对《关于要求解释交通安全责任统筹能否视同第三者责任保险问题的请示》的意见[J];司法业务文选;2005年26期
3 金军;;被自己的车撞伤能否按“第三者”进行索赔?[J];安全与健康;2007年14期
4 ;云南省机动车第三者责任法定保险暂行规定[J];云南政报;1993年10期
5 顾毓玺;《道路交通事故处理办法》有待修订[J];上海保险;1996年06期
6 ;北京新交法凸显八大变化[J];现代乡镇;2004年Z3期
7 田松涛;;对机动车第三者责任强制保险赔付制度的思考[J];科技信息(科学教研);2007年17期
8 范仕源;车保:第三者责任强制保险[J];安全与健康;2004年08期
9 薛斐;;试析“车上人员”与“第三者”的转化问题[J];青年与社会;2013年10期
10 梁天基;完善机动车第三者责任强制保险制度刍议[J];广西医科大学学报(社会科学版);2005年S1期
相关会议论文 前6条
1 魏小燕;;机动车第三者责任强制保险中的法律纠纷问题[A];浙江省2013年保险法学学术年会论文集[C];2013年
2 杨丽英;;论凉山彝族习惯法与等级婚姻关系[A];全国外国法制史研究会学术丛书——多元的法律文化[C];2006年
3 韩布新;;基督教传统下的家庭与婚姻关系[A];增强心理学服务社会的意识和功能——中国心理学会成立90周年纪念大会暨第十四届全国心理学学术会议论文摘要集[C];2011年
4 张姝s，
本文编号：2143359
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2143359.html
