论我国特留份制度的立法完善
[Abstract]:The freedom of will is the basic idea of the system of testamentary succession, but in order to maintain the family ethics and order, countries all over the world insist on the freedom of will at the same time, they also restrict the freedom of will by setting up the system of special share retention. Although the present inheritance law in our country has made some restrictions on the freedom of will in the form of legal provisions, the inheritance law only gives a certain necessary inheritance right to the "double none" person and the unborn fetus among the heirs. The restriction of this provision on the freedom of will is weaker than the foreign retention system, but from the humanitarian point of view of helping the weak to help the poor, it sets a necessary share for the "double nil" persons and foetus, compared with the special retention system in the western countries. Due to the narrow scope of the subject involved, the uncertainty of the standard of the subject and the lack of specific standard of the share, the will of the testator is excessive. This kind of legislation is inconsistent with the nature of the status law of inheritance law and does not correspond to the function of providing for the aged and raising children in the family law, and it can easily lead to the weakening of the family ethical relationship and even the destruction of the family order and social justice. With the development of social production, the improvement of productivity, the increasing of social wealth, people's awareness of protecting their rights is increasingly aroused, people become more and more cautious about their own interests, and the society is opening up day by day. The more general application of the freedom of will has led many people to take advantage of the gap in the law, to abuse the freedom of will, to let some people suffer losses in the division of the estate and not to get the benefits they deserve, which also makes the family conflicts become more and more serious. The friendly and harmonious relations among close relatives are under attack, so the retention system as a stipulation of inheritance law becomes more and more important and needs to be perfected. This paper will analyze the legislative status quo, defects and shortcomings of the system of compulsory succession in China. By observing the legislative provisions of the special retention system in foreign countries and analyzing its value concept, this paper puts forward some concrete personal ideas and suggestions for the legislative perfection of the special retention system in our country. The main point of this paper is that the present testate succession system of our country has serious shortcomings and defects, which need to be further improved and perfected. Inheritance law as the status of property law, testamentary succession can not completely follow the principle of freedom of will, but also should take due account of the balance between other values, we should make clear restrictions on the freedom of will in the law, To build a special system for the development of China's national conditions.
【学位授予单位】:甘肃政法学院
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D923.5
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘宁;特留份制度探析[J];福建政法管理干部学院学报;2001年04期
2 宋豫;我国四法域特留份制度比较研究[J];学术研究;2002年02期
3 柏淑清,夏露露;试论特留份制度[J];湖南省政法管理干部学院学报;2002年06期
4 孙斌;我国应建立特留份制度[J];六盘水师范高等专科学校学报;2002年02期
5 刘渝峡;;特留份制度探析[J];西南政法大学学报;2002年05期
6 史浩明;我国应建立特留份制度[J];政法论丛;2003年03期
7 杜立聪;特留份制度初探[J];行政与法(吉林省行政学院学报);2005年06期
8 马睿丽;;我国特留份制度构建范式的新思考[J];河南司法警官职业学院学报;2005年04期
9 王宇娣;;构建我国的特留份制度[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2006年09期
10 郭常春;;论建立我国特留份制度的必要性[J];山西经济管理干部学院学报;2007年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前8条
1 王景;遗嘱自由应引入特留份制度[N];江苏法制报;2008年
2 王景;继承法中特留份制度的构建[N];江苏经济报;2009年
3 禹怀;特留份制度的构建[N];江苏经济报;2014年
4 杨立新 中国人民大学法学院;在《继承法》中规定特留份制度[N];中国社会科学报;2012年
5 福建市厦门市中级人民法院 刘新平;涉胎儿利益诉讼当事人问题探析[N];人民法院报;2011年
6 杨山明;该继承案应如何处理[N];江苏经济报;2004年
7 本报记者 刘炜;继承法实施27年将首迎大修[N];民主与法制时报;2012年
8 北京市中凯律师事务所 陈凯;遗嘱库能否破解继承难题[N];北京日报;2013年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 曹海荣;特留份制度研究[D];中国政法大学;2007年
2 沈星;特留份制度与归扣制度比较研究[D];广西大学;2008年
3 李凌云;完善我国特留份制度的立法设想[D];复旦大学;2008年
4 朱梨;特留份制度研究[D];西南政法大学;2009年
5 陈宏繁;特留份制度创设论[D];兰州大学;2009年
6 李丹铭;我国特留份制度的构建[D];内蒙古大学;2009年
7 姚迎新;特留份制度研究[D];河北大学;2010年
8 李娜;我国继承法中引入特留份制度初探[D];贵州大学;2009年
9 吴一多;论我国特留份制度的构建[D];上海交通大学;2009年
10 朱永乐;特留份制度研究[D];吉林大学;2011年
,本文编号:2296561
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2296561.html