虚假离婚诉讼中债权人利益保护问题研究
发布时间：2018-11-28 18:40
【摘要】：虚假离婚,也就是我们通常所说的假离婚,即夫妻一方或夫妻双方根本没有离婚的真实内心意思,为达到某种非法利益,通过双方合谋或一方受对方欺骗而达到离婚目的。改革开放的发展,市场经济的繁荣,带来了社会经济的飞速跨越,但同时在经济利益的巨大诱惑下,诚信问题成了困扰社会发展的障碍。在婚姻领域,也呈现出弄虚作假的恶性态势,并且愈演愈烈,严重危及到债权人的合法利益,致使蒙受不同程度的困扰和侵害。甚至在很多虚假离婚案件中,出现无辜债权人有理说不出,眼睁睁看到自己的合法债权化为乌有却无力挽回自己的损失。 鉴于此,如何在虚假离婚诉讼中实现对债权人合法利益的保护问题值得研究。笔者从夫妻共同债务的认定及证明规则,虚假离婚诉讼证据审查及第三人撤销之诉制度等实体法层面与程序法层面相结合的角度进行深入分析与探讨,探索建构保护债权人合法利益的切实可行的办法。
[Abstract]:False divorce, which is usually referred to as false divorce, means that one spouse or both husband and wife do not have the true intention of divorce at all. In order to achieve some illegal interests, the two parties collude or one side is deceived by the other party to achieve the purpose of divorce. The development of reform and opening up and the prosperity of market economy have brought the rapid leap of social economy, but at the same time, under the huge temptation of economic interests, the problem of honesty and credit has become an obstacle to the development of society. In the field of marriage, there is also a vicious situation of fraud, which is becoming more and more serious, which seriously endangers the legitimate interests of creditors and results in varying degrees of distress and infringement. Even in many false divorce cases, the emergence of innocent creditors can not justify, see their legitimate claims to be destroyed but unable to recover their losses. In view of this, how to protect the legitimate interests of creditors in false divorce proceedings is worth studying. The author analyzes and probes into the combination of substantive law and procedural law, such as the identification and proof rules of joint debt of husband and wife, the examination of evidence in false divorce proceedings and the system of action by third party. To explore practical ways to protect the legitimate interests of creditors.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.9
本文编号：2363909
[Abstract]:False divorce, which is usually referred to as false divorce, means that one spouse or both husband and wife do not have the true intention of divorce at all. In order to achieve some illegal interests, the two parties collude or one side is deceived by the other party to achieve the purpose of divorce. The development of reform and opening up and the prosperity of market economy have brought the rapid leap of social economy, but at the same time, under the huge temptation of economic interests, the problem of honesty and credit has become an obstacle to the development of society. In the field of marriage, there is also a vicious situation of fraud, which is becoming more and more serious, which seriously endangers the legitimate interests of creditors and results in varying degrees of distress and infringement. Even in many false divorce cases, the emergence of innocent creditors can not justify, see their legitimate claims to be destroyed but unable to recover their losses. In view of this, how to protect the legitimate interests of creditors in false divorce proceedings is worth studying. The author analyzes and probes into the combination of substantive law and procedural law, such as the identification and proof rules of joint debt of husband and wife, the examination of evidence in false divorce proceedings and the system of action by third party. To explore practical ways to protect the legitimate interests of creditors.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：D923.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张海朝;;恶意诉讼行为及其规制——以婚姻家庭案件为视角[J];法制与社会;2012年07期
2 崔山;;房屋拆迁安置中假离婚现象分析[J];资源与人居环境;2008年18期
3 杨穗权;;民事虚假诉讼的成因及对策[J];法制与经济(中旬);2011年11期
4 王合静;;案外第三人之申请再审权——对《审判监督程序若干问题的解释》第五条之解读[J];河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年04期
5 王学东;祝新明;王惠兴;马超;;法律的生命在于运用——从《婚姻法司法解释(二)》第二十四条谈起[J];宁波广播电视大学学报;2012年02期
6 刘辉;牛海燕;;基于虚假诉讼的法律思考[J];企业导报;2012年01期
7 高原;;新房产政策下假离婚现象的法律思考[J];山西财经大学学报;2011年S1期
8 刘艳;;虚假诉讼在婚姻家庭领域的规避[J];河南省政法管理干部学院学报;2010年06期
9 崔西营;;我国离婚救济制度之管见[J];泰安教育学院学报岱宗学刊;2011年03期
10 刘萍;;我国夫妻债务制度立法反思[J];学术论坛;2006年06期
，本文编号：2363909
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2363909.html
