婚内强奸入罪问题研究
[Abstract]:Marital rape is an objective domestic violence, and its level of violence is no less than that of general rape, both physically and emotionally, more than the general domestic violence. In recent years, domestic violence has slowly been attached to the attention of the society, and the perpetrators of domestic violence have been morally condemned and have been punished in law. However, because of the restriction of Chinese traditional thought and the privacy of family relationship, marital rape is always in the dark box, and the victim is often not protected by the law. As the current law in our country does not give a clear legal definition for marital rape, there is nothing to do with the justice sector in dealing with such cases. With the development of the thought of human rights protection, the protection of the rights and interests of women's marriage is also paid more and more attention. In recent years, the crime of marital rape has been raised in all sectors of the community, and whether it constitutes a crime is a very sensitive issue in the legal and judicial circles. As to whether the crime is a crime, it has formed a negative theory in the criminal law circle of our country, and the three universities have to say and compromise. The author denies that marital rape is different from the general rape, and that the marital rape is different from the general rape, and the marriage has a certain immunity to the forced sexual behavior, and the husband's rape wife cannot and should not be identified as a rape. The crime of marital rape constitutes a crime, and marital rape constitutes a crime, and marital rape is not a violation of the statutory principle of the crime and punishment stipulated in the criminal law of our country, so marital rape constitutes a rape. The denial of the lawful rights and interests of women in the area of marriage is a disregard for the rights of women and a view to the violation of the rights of women. Step. And it must be said that the existence of a marital relationship is not fully taken into account, and that the autonomy of the wife is too absolute The two theories are not conducive to the protection of women and the family and With the progress of the times and the redefinition of marital rape in the field of law and the judicial circle of the world, the trade-off of marital rape is also produced. The compromise is, in essence, a negative and a negative, restrictive, negative. It is said that marital rape is not, in any case, a marital rape, which can only be limited in certain circumstances. In addition to the four basic elements of the crime, the marital rape must meet the following two conditions: first, the perpetrator and the victim must have a legal relationship; and 2. The identification of marital rape shall be limited to the conditions in which the wife has a legal reason to be exempted from the obligation of cohabitation In comparison with ordinary rape, marital rape has similar legal characteristics, but there is a large difference between them. In the case of marital rape, it is more important to consider the social harm of the act, in addition to the purpose and motivation of the occurrence of marital rape. due to the particularity of the subject, etc. The compromise is that marital rape is separated from ordinary rape and is conducive to the fight against crime and the protection of women's rights, as well as for the promotion of family harmony It is also a relatively new concept in our country that marital rape is a relatively new concept in our country. Since there is no explicit provision on whether marital rape is a crime in our country, the case of marital rape is often completely different when the judiciary is facing marital rape. There is no clear legislation that tends to indulge in criminals, resulting in the administration of justice. Unfair. The legislation on marital rape is highlighted. Don't be important. If marital rape is a crime, many foreign countries have studied earlier, and there are also legislation Based on the study of the theory of the crime of marital rape in the world's major developed countries, this year, this year's national legislation The following legislative proposals are put forward: the establishment of the marital rape in the criminal law; the establishment of the marital rape as a case of self-prosecution; the introduction of the mediation system and the civil tort system; and the application of the punishment for marital rape to a wide and tight phase. It is believed that with the progress of the society, the change of people's concept, the development of the theory research, the enhancement of the consciousness of women's rights protection and the perfection of the legislation, the marital rape must account for one in the legal field. Therefore, it is of great theoretical significance and present to study the crime of marital rape.
【学位授予单位】:吉林大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:D924.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李盾;婚内强奸引起的讨论(英文)[J];Women of China;2002年02期
2 喻军;婚内强奸与妇女人权保护[J];湘潭师范学院学报(社会科学版);2002年02期
3 杨永华;论“婚内强奸”行为[J];河南公安高等专科学校学报;2003年05期
4 冀祥德;论婚内强奸法律救济——从《婚姻法》修改价值取向之视角[J];政法论坛;2002年06期
5 钟情;;不能默认“婚内强奸”的“合法性”[J];新疆人大(汉文);2006年04期
6 冀祥德,刘科科;对婚内强奸的理性分析与思考[J];山东公安专科学校学报;2001年04期
7 吴曙明;婚内强奸是否构成犯罪[J];人民公安;2002年13期
8 周敏;婚内强奸罪初探[J];广东商学院学报;2002年S1期
9 王苏平,苗玉红;解读“婚内强奸”问题[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2001年02期
10 李立众;婚内强奸应构成强奸罪——王卫明婚内强奸案评析[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2001年04期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 夏凉;;对婚内强迫性交行为出入罪之理性探索[A];当代法学论坛(二○一○年第2辑)[C];2010年
2 刘强;;论我国适当扩大犯罪圈的必要性及根据[A];中国犯罪学学会第十七届学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年
3 樊雅丽;;沟通与和谐——性在婚姻中的伦理探究[A];中国性学会成立十周年首届中国性科学高级论坛论文汇编[C];2004年
4 王洪;;论法律推理与司法判决推理[A];2003年逻辑研究专辑[C];2003年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院研究生 马志萍;“非法传销”入罪化之评价[N];法制日报;2008年
2 王万军;传销“入罪”将加快中国直销行业洗牌[N];商务时报;2008年
3 大学生 王雅琦;处置骗购经适房,可学美国将其“入罪”[N];新华每日电讯;2010年
4 李克杰;骗购经适房入罪的情与理[N];检察日报;2010年
5 上海市人民检察院第—分院 曹坚;“人肉搜索”暂缓入罪凸显立法审慎[N];检察日报;2009年
6 李政;飞行员资质造假应入罪[N];检察日报;2010年
7 张西流;醉驾飙车立法入罪值得期待[N];咸宁日报;2010年
8 本报记者 陈丽平 本报见习记者 李吉斌;醉驾入罪符合国情但应细化[N];法制日报;2010年
9 上海市人民检察院第一分院检察官,法学博士 曹坚;酒驾入罪当缓行[N];上海金融报;2010年
10 记者 郑赫南;食品安全监管人员渎职拟单列入罪[N];检察日报;2010年
相关博士学位论文 前8条
1 胡业勋;立法上的金融违法行为入罪研究[D];西南财经大学;2010年
2 李拥军;性权利研究[D];吉林大学;2007年
3 秦新承;支付方式的演进对诈骗犯罪的影响研究[D];华东政法大学;2012年
4 邵小平;著作权刑事保护研究[D];华东政法大学;2011年
5 赵合俊;作为人权的性权利[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2002年
6 马泓波;《宋会要辑稿·刑法》整理与研究[D];陕西师范大学;2005年
7 刘鑫;论民间融资的刑法规制[D];华东政法大学;2012年
8 王骏;刑法中的正当化事由基本问题研究[D];武汉大学;2012年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 雷丹;婚内强奸问题研究[D];河南大学;2010年
2 付焯炜;论婚内强奸[D];中国政法大学;2010年
3 方玉宝;婚内强奸的刑法规制[D];苏州大学;2010年
4 王冠;婚内强奸若干问题研究[D];东北师范大学;2010年
5 彭婧;婚内强奸的定罪分析[D];西南政法大学;2011年
6 沈成莉;婚内强奸问题研究[D];西南政法大学;2011年
7 杨莉;婚内强奸入罪问题研究[D];湘潭大学;2005年
8 刘佳;论新加坡同性恋入罪条[D];华东政法大学;2011年
9 王广见;醉酒驾驶行为入罪研究[D];郑州大学;2011年
10 唐芳;醉驾入罪问题研究[D];中南大学;2012年
本文编号:2366905
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2366905.html