家事诉讼示范证据运用问题研究
[Abstract]:With the advancement of the current reform of family litigation, court mediation has become the main way to settle disputes in family litigation instead of adjudication according to law. In family litigation, the limitation and insufficiency of one-sided pursuit of mediation and closure are increasingly prominent. Therefore, it is necessary to reflect on the direction of family litigation reform and to realize the legal standardization of resolving family litigation disputes. In the process of family action, whether the parties prove the facts to be proved or the judge determines the facts of the case, all the activities are carried out around the evidence of litigation. The standardized settlement of family litigation disputes depends on the proper use of evidence, which is the core of the whole litigation activity. However, family disputes are different from common civil disputes, and their particularities are mainly reflected in the difficulty of litigation proof. In order to realize the legal standardization of resolving family litigation disputes, it is necessary to establish the judicial active mechanism of family litigation proof, to construct a system of rules for the application of demonstration evidence in family litigation, and to guide the parties to collect evidence and prove evidence. Regulate the interpretation and certification of judges. The main body of the article is divided into four parts. First of all, the paper summarizes the model evidence of family litigation, expounds the core position of evidence in family litigation, and leads to the meaning of model evidence in family litigation. Then, the author analyzes the judicial status and causes of the application of family litigation evidence, that is, the difficulties in the application of family litigation evidence. Then, it is not only the response to the former part, but also the foreshadowing for the next part to construct the rules system of the application of the model evidence in the family litigation, which is not only the response to the former part, but also the solution of the guidance and normative function of the demonstration evidence in the family litigation to resolve the difficulty of the application of the family lawsuit evidence. Finally, according to the process of family action, from the establishment of the rules of confirming the facts to be proved, the rules of proof of the parties, the rules of interpretation by the judges, the rules of the authentication of the judges, and so on, the system of rules for the application of the model evidence in the family litigation is constructed. To provide judicial evidence for the main body of family litigation and the norms of the facts.
【学位授予单位】:华侨大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.1;D923.9
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 苏满满;浅谈询问中证据运用的原则[J];中国监察;2002年13期
2 梁文华;论执行工作中的证据运用[J];广西政法管理干部学院学报;2001年S1期
3 王成;电子数据的证据运用[J];通信企业管理;2002年07期
4 何永水,韩立峰;论证据运用中人权保障的缺陷及完善设想[J];河北科技大学人民警察学院学报;2003年01期
5 张愈;;战场证据运用的六种途径[J];法制与社会;2010年04期
6 王银;涉外犯罪案件的证据运用[J];西北第二民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版);1995年02期
7 李永军;讯问中的证据运用原则[J];人民检察;1997年05期
8 李发友;;刑事证据运用中存在的问题及对策[J];民营科技;2010年09期
9 邱爱民;论司法实践中证据运用问题的若干误区[J];学海;2001年04期
10 白似冰;;司法实践中证据运用存在的问题及完善[J];辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报;2008年03期
相关重要报纸文章 前4条
1 中国政法大学 卞建林 山东省邹平市人民检察院 邹长恩;规范证据运用 防止冤假错案[N];检察日报;2013年
2 河南省淅川县人民法院 魏建国 谢蕊娜;电子证据运用问题探析[N];人民法院报;2013年
3 宋世杰;证据运用中的问题及其补救[N];检察日报;2002年
4 邱学锋;刑事证据运用中的问题及建议[N];江苏法制报;2014年
相关硕士学位论文 前8条
1 王云飞;贪污贿赂案件的事实认定与证据运用研究[D];上海交通大学;2015年
2 陈曦;侦探小说的推理模式与证据运用[D];山东大学;2017年
3 王樤n,
本文编号:2399522
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2399522.html