重婚罪问题研究
发布时间：2019-05-16 12:07
【摘要】：社会的和谐以家庭的和谐为基础，而家庭的和谐又与婚姻关系的稳定戚戚相关。重婚行为是破坏家庭婚姻关系，影响家庭和社会和谐的重要因素。为了规制重婚行为，我国《刑法》第二百五十八规定：“有配偶而重婚的，或者明知他人有配偶而与之结婚的，处二年以下有期徒刑或者拘役。”然而，在我国司法实践中，重婚罪的认定却存在诸多问题，如重婚罪的客体问题、事实重婚问题、瑕疵重婚问题、重婚罪的追诉时效等。 本文共分为四个部分。第一部分论述的是重婚罪的客体问题。笔者从配偶权和一夫一妻制的概念入手，引入我国刑法学界对于重婚罪客体的不同观点并结合司法实践中相关案例进行分析，最终认为重婚罪的客体应是“一夫一妻制度”。 第二部分论述的是事实重婚问题。笔者首先介绍了其他国家和地区事实婚姻的情况，然后对刑法中的事实婚姻做了一个界定，笔者认为，刑法中的“事实婚姻”是指男女双方均已达到法定的结婚年龄，无直系和旁系三代以内的血缘关系，未患有医学上认为不适宜结婚的疾病，以永远共同生活为目标，未经登记便公开的以夫妻名义同居在一起。最后，笔者对事实重婚的成立要件进行了论述。笔者认为，事实重婚可以构成重婚罪，但需具体情况具体分析。 第三部分论述的是瑕疵重婚问题。笔者首先通过司法实践中相关案例引出了问题，并对“宣告死亡”、无效和可撤消婚姻在刑法上的效力进行了论述，对重婚罪中的“有配偶”进行了解释。笔者认为，程序瑕疵的重婚行为不能构成重婚罪，事实瑕疵的重婚行为应以重婚罪论处。 第四部分论述的是重婚罪的追诉时效问题。对于重婚罪的追诉时效，我国刑法学界众说纷纭。笔者通过对主要学术观点的评析和其他国家对于重婚罪追诉时效的特殊规定的比较，，已提出了一个相对完善的重婚罪追诉时效计算方法。笔者认为，在我国现行的法律规定下，将重婚罪区分为法律重婚和事实重婚，然后法律重婚以领取重婚的结婚证之日起计算追诉时效；事实重婚则以刑法意义上的事实婚姻关系解除之日起计算追诉时效是最合理的。
[Abstract]:The harmony of society is based on the harmony of family, and the harmony of family is closely related to the stability of marriage. Bigamy is an important factor that destroys family marriage and affects family and social harmony. In order to regulate bigamy, Article 258 of the Criminal Law of our country stipulates: "whoever has a spouse or marries him knowing that another person has a spouse shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than two years or criminal detention." However, in the judicial practice of our country, there are many problems in the cognizance of bigamy, such as the object of bigamy, the problem of factual bigamy, the problem of defective bigamy, the limitation of prosecution of bigamy, and so on. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part discusses the object of bigamy. Starting with the concepts of spouse right and monogamy, the author introduces different viewpoints on the object of bigamy in the field of criminal law in our country and analyzes them in combination with relevant cases in judicial practice. Finally, the author holds that the object of bigamy should be "monogyny system". The second part discusses the problem of factual bigamy. The author first introduces the situation of de facto marriage in other countries and regions, and then defines the de facto marriage in criminal law. The author believes that "de facto marriage" in criminal law refers to the fact that both men and women have reached the legal age of marriage. There is no consanguineous relationship between the immediate and adjacent families within three generations, there is no disease that is considered unsuitable for marriage in medicine, and the goal is to live together forever, and live together in the name of husband and wife without registration. Finally, the author discusses the establishment elements of de facto bigamy. The author believes that bigamy can constitute the crime of bigamy, but the specific situation needs to be analyzed. The third part discusses the problem of defective bigamy. First of all, the author raises the problems through the relevant cases in judicial practice, and discusses the effect of "declaration of death", annulment and annulment of marriage in criminal law, and explains the "spouse" in the crime of bigamy. The author believes that bigamy with procedural defects can not constitute bigamy, and bigamy with factual defects should be treated as bigamy. The fourth part discusses the statute of limitations of bigamy. There are different opinions on the statute of limitations of bigamy in the field of criminal law in our country. Through the analysis of the main academic viewpoints and the comparison of the special provisions of the statute of limitations for bigamy in other countries, the author has put forward a relatively perfect method for calculating the statute of limitations for bigamy. The author believes that under the current legal provisions of our country, the crime of bigamy is divided into legal bigamy and de facto bigamy, and then legal bigamy is calculated from the date of obtaining bigamy certificate. Factual bigamy is the most reasonable to calculate the statute of limitations from the date of dissolution of de facto marriage in the sense of criminal law.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.9
本文编号：2478265
[Abstract]:The harmony of society is based on the harmony of family, and the harmony of family is closely related to the stability of marriage. Bigamy is an important factor that destroys family marriage and affects family and social harmony. In order to regulate bigamy, Article 258 of the Criminal Law of our country stipulates: "whoever has a spouse or marries him knowing that another person has a spouse shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than two years or criminal detention." However, in the judicial practice of our country, there are many problems in the cognizance of bigamy, such as the object of bigamy, the problem of factual bigamy, the problem of defective bigamy, the limitation of prosecution of bigamy, and so on. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part discusses the object of bigamy. Starting with the concepts of spouse right and monogamy, the author introduces different viewpoints on the object of bigamy in the field of criminal law in our country and analyzes them in combination with relevant cases in judicial practice. Finally, the author holds that the object of bigamy should be "monogyny system". The second part discusses the problem of factual bigamy. The author first introduces the situation of de facto marriage in other countries and regions, and then defines the de facto marriage in criminal law. The author believes that "de facto marriage" in criminal law refers to the fact that both men and women have reached the legal age of marriage. There is no consanguineous relationship between the immediate and adjacent families within three generations, there is no disease that is considered unsuitable for marriage in medicine, and the goal is to live together forever, and live together in the name of husband and wife without registration. Finally, the author discusses the establishment elements of de facto bigamy. The author believes that bigamy can constitute the crime of bigamy, but the specific situation needs to be analyzed. The third part discusses the problem of defective bigamy. First of all, the author raises the problems through the relevant cases in judicial practice, and discusses the effect of "declaration of death", annulment and annulment of marriage in criminal law, and explains the "spouse" in the crime of bigamy. The author believes that bigamy with procedural defects can not constitute bigamy, and bigamy with factual defects should be treated as bigamy. The fourth part discusses the statute of limitations of bigamy. There are different opinions on the statute of limitations of bigamy in the field of criminal law in our country. Through the analysis of the main academic viewpoints and the comparison of the special provisions of the statute of limitations for bigamy in other countries, the author has put forward a relatively perfect method for calculating the statute of limitations for bigamy. The author believes that under the current legal provisions of our country, the crime of bigamy is divided into legal bigamy and de facto bigamy, and then legal bigamy is calculated from the date of obtaining bigamy certificate. Factual bigamy is the most reasonable to calculate the statute of limitations from the date of dissolution of de facto marriage in the sense of criminal law.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2013
【分类号】：D923.9
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 温文治,陈洪兵;对重婚罪的重新解读——兼对妨害婚姻、家庭罪整体搬迁之利弊分析[J];安徽大学学报;2005年01期
2 韩玉胜;;关于重婚罪几个问题的探讨[J];法律学习与研究;1987年01期
3 余延满;论婚姻的成立[J];法学评论;2004年05期
4 王旭霞;;事实婚姻法律地位之分析[J];甘肃省经济管理干部学院学报;2008年01期
5 齐晓伶;张训;;重婚罪内涵之实践检视——从一则“同性恋非法同居”案例说起[J];甘肃社会科学;2010年04期
6 何荣功;;财产罪法益新论[J];甘肃政法学院学报;2012年01期
7 刘丽萍;;非法吸收公众存款罪的法益探求[J];湖北警官学院学报;2012年02期
8 晋涛;;开放视野下的重婚罪探析[J];淮北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年01期
9 蔡大宇,魏干;论重婚罪的几个问题[J];河南公安高等专科学校学报;2004年03期
10 魏汉涛;;以客观解释论解读重婚罪[J];海南大学学报(人文社会科学版);2006年02期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 文亚苗;重婚罪的立法完善研究[D];湖南大学;2009年
本文编号：2478265
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/hyflw/2478265.html
