关于电商限制退货商品范围条款之效力探讨

发布时间：2017-12-31 04:24

本文关键词：关于电商限制退货商品范围条款之效力探讨　出处：《牡丹江大学学报》2016年06期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：新《消法》第25条第2款对不适用无理由退货制度的商品作有兜底规定,因无实施细则,在实务中,哪些种类商品不宜退货、消费者和确认时间及其效力等问题应予以厘清。判断商品是否不宜退货,可借鉴英美侵权法中的"理性人标准",并考虑商品自身因素;经营者获得消费者确认的时间应当限定为合同成立前;限制退货商品范围条款的效力则应根据消费者的确认是否是其真实意思表示予以判断。
[Abstract]:Paragraph second of the new consumer law < > twenty-fifth have fallback provisions of the system does not apply no reason to return goods, because there is no implementation details, in practice, what kinds of commodities should return, consumers and confirm the time and effect of such problems should be clarified. To determine whether the goods should not be returned, can be used in Anglo American tort law "rational the standard", and considering the factors of its commodity; operators get consumers to confirm the time should be limited to the contract before the establishment; limit the effectiveness of the return of goods in terms of scope should be based on the consumer to confirm whether it is its true intention to judge.

【作者单位】：烟台大学;
【分类号】：D922.294
【正文快照】： 新《消费者权益保护法》(以下简称新《消法》)第25条规定了无理由退货制度,也即消费者的“反悔权”,并排除了四类商品的适用。但对于这四类之外的商品,仅仅作有“其他根据商品性质并经消费者在购买时确认不宜退货的商品,不适用无理由退货”的兜底规定,至于具体具有哪些特征的

【相似文献】