未成年人股东与股权的法律性质与法律规制

发布时间：2018-01-09 00:02

本文关键词：未成年人股东与股权的法律性质与法律规制　出处：《中国青年社会科学》2016年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：未成年人持股有着复杂的背景和原因,由此决定了其法律性质的不同。代持股权、未成年人自有股权和家庭股权共有是三种基本类型,代持股权为无需举证之常态,自有股权和股权共有为需特别证明之特例。不同性质和类型的未成年人持股其法律效力有所不同,未成年人持有股权本身不存在法律障碍,其代持股权之效力取决于其父母或实际投资人拥有股权的合法性,其取得股权和行使股权可通过监护或法定代理的方式实现。应基于未成年人持股的法律性质从效力认定、信息披露、股东权利行使、股东义务和责任承担等方面对其进行特别的制度设计和法律规制。
[Abstract]:Underage ownership has complex background and reasons, which determines the legal nature of the different. Acting holding equity, minors own equity and family equity are the three basic types. Proxy equity is the norm without proof, and ownership and equity ownership are special cases that need special proof. The legal effect of different nature and type of minor shareholding is different. There are no legal obstacles for minors to hold equity in their own right, and the validity of holding equity on their behalf depends on the legality of ownership by their parents or actual investors. The acquisition and exercise of equity can be realized by guardianship or legal agency. It should be based on the legal nature of minors' shareholding from the validity of the determination, information disclosure, the exercise of shareholders' rights. The shareholders' obligations and responsibilities are specially designed and regulated by law.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学民商经济法学院;
【分类号】：D922.287;C913.5
【正文快照】： 主持人赵旭东(中国政法大学民商经济法学院教授):2007年北京银行“娃娃股东”事件引发的未成年人股东与股权的评论和研究曾热极一时,2015年低龄股东频频套现,引发人们再次关注未成年人股东问题。对此学者有必要围绕一些深层法律问题:如未成年股权形成的客观原因是什么、未成年

【相似文献】