在线纠纷解决机制与我国矛盾纠纷多元化解机制的衔接

发布时间：2018-01-11 17:37

本文关键词：在线纠纷解决机制与我国矛盾纠纷多元化解机制的衔接　出处：《法律适用》2016年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在线纠纷解决机制(ODR)是伴随电子商务的发展而兴起的纠纷解决方式,在欧美发达国家ODR是保障电子商务健康发展的重要基础。我国ODR发展相对滞后,与我国网络大国并不相称,国家有必要加大对ODR的引导、规范、监管、投入,实现ODR与我国矛盾纠纷多元化解机制的有效衔接,重点实现观念、制度、机制、保障的衔接。同时,要按照"互联网+"要求,推动我国矛盾纠纷多元化解机制的完善,着重建立健全电子调解、电子仲裁、电子复议、电子司法、电子信访的体制机制,推动矛盾纠纷多元化解机制主动适应"互联网+"时代的挑战和要求。
[Abstract]:Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) is arisen with the development of electronic commerce for the settlement of disputes, the developed countries in Europe and America ODR is an important guarantee for the healthy development of e-commerce. The development of ODR in China is lagging behind, is not commensurate with China's power network, it is necessary to increase the ODR national standards, guidance, supervision. Investment, effective convergence of ODR and contradiction between China's diversified dispute solution mechanism, focus on the realization of the concept, system, mechanism, guarantee the convergence. At the same time, according to the "Internet plus" requirements, improve and promote China's contradiction of diversified dispute solution mechanism, setting up electronic electronic electronic mediation, arbitration, judicial review, electronic. System and mechanism of e-xinfang, promote the contradiction of diversified dispute solution mechanism to adapt to the "Internet plus" era of challenges and requirements.

【作者单位】：北京市第四中级人民法院;
【分类号】：D922.294;D922.1
【正文快照】： *程琥,法学博士,社会学博士后,研究员,北京市第四中级人民法院副院长。〔1〕范筱静:“电子商务中在线纠纷解决机制初探———以信息技术应用和消费者保护为视角”,载《科技与法律》2012年第4期。〔2〕刘满达:“论争议的在线解决”,载《法学》2002年第8期。随着互联网和电子商

【参考文献】