公司僵局法律制度研究
发布时间:2018-01-16 19:33
本文关键词:公司僵局法律制度研究 出处:《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:2005年我国《公司法》的修改,首次规定了司法介入公司僵局制度,填补了立法上关于司法解散公司制度的空白。司法解散公司制度的制定对后来公司的发展产生了重大影响,也为中小股东保护其合法权益提供了法律上的保障。但是,随着经济不断发展,公司数量也在不断激增,但也出现了许多新的问题,司法介入解散公司制度弊端也逐渐显现出来,难以适应当前出现复杂的情形。本文分析了公司僵局的概念、类型,以及导致公司僵局的成因,包括因股东或董事之间的矛盾引起的决策上的僵局,和传统上的法律制度理念的影响等深层原因。并指出当前我国相关法律法规存在司法介入破解公司僵局的方式单一、法律规定的太过原则化、缺乏可操作性以及外部救济制度的缺失等不足之处。在原有的救济途径基础上提出了我国应当建立的破解公司僵局的救济途径,包括仲裁、调解、指定临时监管人、强制购买股份、强制公司分立等措施,实现破解公司僵局措施的多元化。本文对公司僵局制度的分析及提出的一些相关对策,旨在抛砖引玉。笔者深信,随着我国法治社会的建设和公司法的不断健全,以及对公司僵局问题的不断深入研究和公司立法与司法实践之间的良性互动,公司僵局制度将会更加合理,更加完善。
[Abstract]:In 2005, the amendment of the Company Law of our country provided for the judicial intervention in the system of corporate deadlock for the first time. The system of judicial dissolution of the company has a significant impact on the later development of the company. It also provides legal protection for minority shareholders to protect their legitimate rights and interests. However, with the continuous development of the economy, the number of companies is also increasing, but there are many new problems. The malpractice of judicial intervention in the dissolution of the company system also gradually appears, difficult to adapt to the current complex situation. This paper analyzes the concept, types of corporate deadlock, and the causes of the corporate deadlock. Including the deadlock in decision-making caused by conflicts between shareholders or directors. And the influence of the traditional legal system concept and other deep-seated reasons. And pointed out that the current relevant laws and regulations in China there is a single way of judicial intervention to break the deadlock of the company, the legal provisions are too principled. Lack of maneuverability and lack of external relief system. On the basis of the original relief approach, we put forward the remedy ways to solve the corporate deadlock, including arbitration, mediation. Appointment of temporary supervisor, mandatory purchase of shares, forced separation of companies and other measures to achieve the diversification of measures to break the corporate deadlock. This paper analyzes the system of corporate deadlock and some related countermeasures. The author is convinced that with the construction of China's legal society and the continuous improvement of company law, as well as the continuous in-depth study of corporate deadlock and the positive interaction between corporate legislation and judicial practice. Company deadlock system will be more reasonable, more perfect.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.291.91
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李瑞缘;;公司僵局的司法解决之道:困境解析与路径重构[J];兰州商学院学报;2015年01期
2 张学博;;公司僵局制度研究——最高人民法院指导案例8号评释[J];上海政法学院学报(法治论丛);2013年05期
3 彭鸣;;论公司僵局[J];中国政法大学学报;2010年03期
4 李霞;;公司司法解散的裁判标准如何确定[J];中国审判;2010年03期
5 朱识义;;股东会僵局司法救济的法律思考[J];福建论坛(人文社会科学版);2009年10期
6 叶林;郭丹;;试论“打破公司僵局”[J];广东社会科学;2008年04期
7 温玉娟;;破解公司僵局之法律途径分析——以非司法法律途径为视角[J];消费导刊;2008年04期
8 兰艳;;公司僵局破解的路径选择[J];学术论坛;2007年12期
9 唐烈英;;论公司僵局中股东权益的司法救济——兼评我国公司法的相关规定[J];社会科学研究;2007年05期
10 陈斯;;公司僵局之司法破解——一种以诉讼为进路的纠纷解决模式[J];法治论坛;2007年03期
,本文编号:1434525
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1434525.html