当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 经济法论文 >

诉讼保全责任保险研究

发布时间:2018-01-25 23:45

  本文关键词: 诉讼保全责任保险 保险责任 过错责任原则 出处:《大连海事大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:诉讼保全制度是我国民事诉讼法中重要的一部分,有利于保证当事人合法权益的实现,也有利于诉讼程序的顺利进行。法院根据当事人的申请或者根据案件需要做出财产保全的裁定,但是为了保证财产保全被申请人的合法权益,法院会要求申请人提供相应的担保。目前现有的诉讼保全担保方式存在着一定的不足,不能对双方当事人形成有效的保护。在此前提下,保险公司推出财产保全责任保险,本文将对诉讼保全责任保险进行分析,对其所涉及到的法律关系等进行梳理,从而帮助人们更好的了解该保险,推动该保险的发展。本文第一部分是对诉讼保全责任保险进行概述,结合法律法规以及保险公司的保险条款等给予诉讼保全责任保险明确的定义,通过与传统诉讼保全方式相对比,总结出该保险的特点。另外结合法院和案件适用类型,对于诉讼保全责任保险应用现状进行分析,进而推导出引入诉讼保全责任保险的意义。本文第二部分是对诉讼保全保险性质进行分析,传统的观点认为该保险的性质应为责任保险,其符合责任保险的基本构成及特征,但随着该保险的推进,出现了虚假诉讼和恶意诉讼等情形,有学者提出将该保险性质界定为保证保险,引入保证保险的相关规定能够有效避免虚假诉讼和恶意诉讼等问题;通过对比分析责任保险与保证保险,在现阶段结合实务操作仍将其性质界定为责任保险为宜。本文第三部分是对诉讼保全责任保险在适用过程中存在的问题进行分析并提出相应的解决措施,保险责任是保险中最为核心的问题,在明确保险责任范围的前提下,参考侵权责任认定的构成要件,归纳出保险责任认定的标准;诉讼保全责任保险与通常的责任保险不同,在其保险条款中不设置除外责任,不予设置除外责任的原因需认真考虑;代位求偿权是财产保险中的重要组成部分,财产保险包含责任保险,虽然已经将诉讼保全责任保险性质界定为责任保险,但其又与通常的责任保险并不相同,故而,在诉讼保险责任保险中能否适用代位求偿权以及代位求偿权的构成要件也将是本文的重点研究内容。本文的最后提出诉讼保全责任保险的完善意见,从保险法司法解释、民事诉讼法司法解释、部门规章的完善等角度提出相关法律意见;同时,也对诉讼保全责任保险在实务中的应用提出意见。
[Abstract]:Litigation preservation system is an important part of our civil procedure law, which is conducive to the realization of the legitimate rights and interests of the parties. Also conducive to the smooth conduct of the proceedings. The court according to the application of the parties or according to the need to make the case of property preservation ruling, but in order to ensure property preservation of the legitimate rights and interests of the respondent. The court will require the applicant to provide the corresponding security. At present, there are some deficiencies in the existing litigation preservation security, which can not form an effective protection for both parties. The insurance company introduces the property preservation liability insurance, this article will carry on the analysis to the lawsuit preservation liability insurance, to its involves the legal relation and so on carries on the comb, thus helps the people to understand this insurance better. Promote the development of the insurance. The first part of this article is to summarize the litigation preservation liability insurance, combined with the laws and regulations and insurance clauses of insurance companies to give a clear definition of litigation preservation liability insurance. By comparing with the traditional litigation preservation, this paper summarizes the characteristics of the insurance. In addition, combined with the court and the applicable types of cases, the application status of litigation preservation liability insurance is analyzed. The second part of this paper is to analyze the nature of litigation preservation insurance, the traditional view that the nature of the insurance should be liability insurance. It accords with the basic composition and characteristics of liability insurance, but with the advance of the insurance, there are false litigation and malicious litigation, some scholars proposed to define the nature of the insurance as guarantee insurance. The introduction of the relevant provisions of warranty insurance can effectively avoid false litigation and malicious litigation and other issues; Through the comparative analysis of liability insurance and warranty insurance. The third part of this paper is to analyze the problems existing in the process of application of litigation preservation liability insurance and put forward the corresponding solutions. The insurance liability is the most core problem in the insurance. On the premise of defining the scope of the insurance liability, the standard of the insurance liability identification is summed up by referring to the constitutive elements of the tort liability identification. The litigation preservation liability insurance is different from the usual liability insurance, and the reasons why the exception liability is not established in its insurance clauses need to be seriously considered. Subrogation is an important part of property insurance. Property insurance includes liability insurance. Although the nature of litigation preservation liability insurance has been defined as liability insurance, it is different from the usual liability insurance. Therefore, whether the subrogation claim and the constitution of the subrogation claim can be applied in the litigation insurance liability insurance will also be the key research content of this paper. Finally, this paper puts forward the suggestion of perfecting the lawsuit preservation liability insurance. From the angle of judicial interpretation of insurance law, judicial interpretation of civil procedure law and perfection of departmental regulations, this paper puts forward relevant legal opinions; At the same time, the application of litigation preservation liability insurance in practice is also put forward.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.284

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 常福林;浅析诉讼保全存在的问题、成因及对策[J];法律适用;1998年02期

2 曾若章 ,钟文生;对案外人的财产不能申请诉讼保全[J];社区;2003年11期

3 ;对房产诉讼保全可以不采取查封措施吗[J];民主与法制;2004年18期

4 刘国林;对建筑物的诉讼保全实务[J];中国律师;2001年04期

5 陈江华;对一起诉讼保全案的法律思考[J];企业经济;2002年11期

6 刘振红;对建筑物申请诉讼保全的代理实务[J];安阳师范学院学报;2005年04期

7 刘晓敏;;限制出境措施适用于诉讼保全的可行性初探[J];法制与社会;2009年12期

8 吴建铭;;如何申请诉讼保全[J];农村实用技术;2009年06期

9 梁泠曦;;民事案件中诉讼保全措施的法律实务研究[J];中国安防;2011年05期

10 韦宗;这种做法不是诉讼保全措施[J];人民司法;1983年02期

相关重要报纸文章 前10条

1 王书林邋通讯员 张玉新;乌鲁木齐新市区注重诉讼保全[N];人民法院报;2007年

2 陈大平;诉讼保全与执行之关系论[N];江苏经济报;2011年

3 吴汉国 赵祥森;建议规范担保公司的诉讼保全业务[N];江苏法制报;2012年

4 杨瑞;诉讼保全是否构成侵权的情形[N];江苏经济报;2013年

5 田洋;贵阳诉讼保全担保业务全面启航[N];贵州日报;2014年

6 胡肄东;因诉讼保全引发赔偿 程序问题之分析[N];江苏法制报;2000年

7 洪少峰;当前影响诉讼保全的原因及对策[N];江苏法制报;2005年

8 吴燕;宿迁强化诉讼保全助解“执行难”[N];江苏法制报;2006年

9 郭京霞;北京一中院建立诉讼保全快速通道[N];人民法院报;2006年

10 朱烈旗;泰和诉讼保全案九成调结[N];人民法院报;2007年

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 朱佳;论《合同法》第107条之继续履行[D];南京师范大学;2015年

2 余晴;论我国诉讼保全担保制度的完善[D];江西财经大学;2016年

3 宫赫琳;诉讼保全责任保险研究[D];大连海事大学;2017年

4 顾峗;民事诉讼保全程序研究[D];武汉大学;2005年

5 孙海瑜;诉讼保全制度研究[D];云南大学;2015年



本文编号:1464035

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1464035.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户bb1d1***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com