平台经营者统一销售策略行为的反垄断法适用

发布时间：2018-02-01 05:03

本文关键词： 垄断协议决定平台经营者统一销售策略　出处：《法学》2015年07期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：我国《反垄断法》规定的垄断协议形式有三种,即协议、决定和协同行为,但对于何为决定,尤其是决定的作出主体是谁,反垄断法的规定并不明确。透过文义解释与体系解释可知,决定主要是指行业协会制定或发布的限制竞争规则。如此一来,现实中普遍存在的平台经营者要求其入驻商家执行统一销售策略的行为就难以适用《反垄断法》中有关垄断协议的规定。但是,从限制竞争的效果看,此类行为与行业协会的决定并无实质性差异。因此,有必要通过扩大解释、类推适用或立法修订的方式,扩大垄断协议适用的主体范围,将平台经营者的统一销售策略行为作为类似于行业协会决定的垄断协议予以规制。
[Abstract]:The monopoly agreement form of China's "anti-monopoly law provisions > three, namely agreement, decision and cooperative behavior, but for what is decided, especially the decision of who is the subject, the provisions of the anti-monopoly law is not clear. Through the literal interpretation and explanation system shows that the decision mainly refers to the restriction of competition rules industry associations or released. Thus, the provisions exist in reality the merchants settled platform operators implement uniform sales strategy behavior is difficult to apply the" monopoly agreements anti-monopoly law >. However, the effect of restricting competition, there is no substantial difference between these decision behavior and industry associations. Therefore it is necessary, by expanding the interpretation, analogy or revision of the legislation, expand the scope of the application of monopoly agreement, will act as a unified sales strategy platform operators similar to the industry association decided to monopoly The agreement is regulated.

【作者单位】：安徽大学法学院;中国政法大学博士后流动站;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论项目(14SFB30035)的成果
【分类号】：D922.294
【正文快照】： 一、统一销售策略行为的规制困境企业打折促销无可厚非,但如果在一定时期内,具有竞争关系的企业一致打折,且折扣率基本相同,则这种行为就可能构成对竞争的限制。我国《反垄断法》①明确禁止固定或变更价格行为,而根据国家发改委《反价格垄断规定》第7条之规定,“固定或者变更

【参考文献】