转售价格维持规制原则的适用考量

发布时间：2018-02-10 16:15

本文关键词： 转售价格维持本身违法原则合理性原则　出处：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2015年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：转售价格维持是纵向垄断协议中比较常见的一种表现形式,其在符合一定的市场结构条件下会形成纵向市场垄断,扰乱了正常的市场竞争秩序。我国的《反垄断法》于2008年正式生效,本法第十四条对上下游交易相对人之间达成固定转售价格、限定转售最低价格等垄断协议或行为作出了禁止性规定。同时仿照欧盟“普遍禁止+责任(或部分)豁免”的立法模式,针对转售价格维持行为或协议的特定情形和影响效果,第十五条对此规定了有限制的豁免条件。但是,《反垄断法》对执法实践中转售价格维持的处理和适用原则没有做出明确统一的标准,即适用“本身违法原则”还是“合理性原则”。本文在探讨“本身违法原则”还是“合理性原则”这两个规制原则的理论基础上,并结合执法实践中国家发改委和人民法院关于转售价格垄断案例进行实际分析。笔者在了解转售价格维持行为及其规制原则基本概念的前提下,结合转售价格维持的经济和社会影响,并借鉴美国、欧盟等国家或地区对转售价格维持的法律管理和规制模式,继而对我国反垄断法限定转售价格维持行为的两大原则的选择和适用进行探讨和分析,探索出一条适合中国国情的中国特色的规制形式。从根本上讲,反垄断立法和执法对于转售价格维持协议或行为的限定、规制,根本上是基于对纵向限制价格行为对社会、经济、市场的积极性和消极性的评估。美国和欧盟作为反垄断法的先行者,在经济、政治、以及社会文化的变迁中,其规制转售价格维持行为的法律也随之发展变动。我国反垄断法于2008年实施,笔者认为,可在我国基本国情的基础上,借鉴美国和欧盟的法律经验并吸取其教训,不断修正和完善我国在规制转售价格维持行为方面的法律法规和执法实践,使反垄断法真正为“提高经济效率,保障消费者福利”保驾护航。
[Abstract]:Resale price maintenance is a common form of vertical monopoly agreement, which can form vertical market monopoly under certain market structure. The "Antimonopoly Law" came into effect on 2008. Article 14th of this Law has reached a fixed resale price between counterparties to upstream and downstream transactions. Monopoly agreements or acts such as fixing the minimum price for resale are prohibited. At the same time, following the European Union's legislative model of "general prohibition of liability (or partial) exemption", it aims at the specific circumstances and effects of the resale price maintenance act or agreement. However, the Anti-Monopoly Law does not provide a clear and uniform standard for the treatment and application of resale price maintenance in law enforcement practice. That is to say, the principle of "violation of the law itself" or "principle of reasonableness". This paper discusses the theoretical basis of the two principles of regulation, namely, "the principle of violation of the law itself" or "principle of reasonableness". In the light of the case of resale price monopoly in the practice of law enforcement, the State Development and Reform Commission and the people's Court have made a practical analysis. On the premise of understanding the basic concept of resale price maintenance behavior and its regulation principle, Combined with the economic and social impact of resale price maintenance, and drawing lessons from the United States, the European Union and other countries or regions on resale price maintenance of the legal management and regulation model, Then it discusses and analyzes the choice and application of the two principles of limiting resale price maintenance in China's anti-monopoly law, and explores a form of regulation with Chinese characteristics that is suitable for China's national conditions. Antitrust legislation and enforcement of restrictions on resale price maintenance agreements or behavior, regulation, is fundamentally based on vertical price restrictions on the social, economic, An assessment of market positivity and negativity. The United States and the European Union, as pioneers of anti-monopoly law, have been involved in economic, political, and sociocultural changes. The law governing the maintenance of resale price has also developed and changed. Our anti-monopoly law was put into effect in 2008. The author thinks that on the basis of the basic conditions of our country, we can learn from the legal experience of the United States and the European Union and draw lessons from it. We should revise and perfect our country's laws and regulations and law enforcement practice in regulating the maintenance of resale price constantly, so that the anti-monopoly law can really protect "improving economic efficiency and protecting consumer welfare".
【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】