有限公司瑕疵股权转让问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-02 15:39

本文选题：有限公司　切入点：瑕疵股权　出处：《中国社会科学院研究生院》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在司法实践中,瑕疵股权转让纠纷时有发生。现行法律对瑕疵股权转让问题所做出的规定,存在可操作性较低、不够具体及立法空白点等问题。源于对《中华人民共和国公司法》及相关法律的关注,笔者对瑕疵股权转让的法律问题进行了梳理和论证,通过理解立法本意并利用相关法律理论,提出建议。希望对完善我国瑕疵股权转让制度有所裨益。本文以有限公司(以下简称“有限公司”)为视角,对瑕疵股权转让的相关法律问题予以阐述。除引言和结语外,本文分为四个部分。第一部分首先对瑕疵股权进行法律界定;以瑕疵因素的不同对瑕疵股权进行分类,即出资瑕疵、主体错误及程序瑕疵的瑕疵股权;将有限公司中的瑕疵股权转让行为分为协议转让与非协议转让;协议转让中又包括内部与外部的协议转让,非协议转让主要涉及继承、夫妻共有及股权的强制执行等问题。第二部分是对瑕疵股权转让协议效力、责任承担及救济进行讨论分析。笔者通过对国内不同效力学说的辨析,分别认定瑕疵股权内部转让协议及外部转让协议的效力;分别讨论瑕疵股权出让人和受让人对公司、股东、债权人的责任承担;明晰瑕疵股权转让中善意受让人的法律界定,并依据现有法律规定,讨论善意受让人的救济途径。第三部分对瑕疵股权非协议转让的一些问题进行分析。在继承瑕疵股权时,明确各类瑕疵股权继承的正当性、继承人的继承方式、继承人的责任承担;探讨夫妻分割各种共有瑕疵股权的正当性,以及在分割时存在的立法和实践问题;研究各类瑕疵股权被强制执行的正当性,以及强制执行瑕疵股权时,应注意的问题。第四部分根据瑕疵股权的类型,提出相关制度的完善建议,包括:出资瑕疵股权协议转让中,赋予善意受让人的撤销权、代为诉讼权等救济权;在夫妻分割共有出资瑕疵股权时,完善价值评估机制;在程序瑕疵股权转让制度中,完善强制购买制度、建立优先购买权责任追究制度、明确强制执行程序中优先购买权的行使方式。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, the transfer of defective equity disputes have occurred. The provisions made by law on the transfer of defective equity, have operability is low, the lack of concrete and legislative gaps and other issues. From the < People's Republic of China Company Law > and related legal concerns, legal issues of the transfer of defective equity of the analysis and argumentation, through the understanding of legislative intent and the use of legal theory, put forward some suggestions. We hope to improve our equity transfer system. Based on the defective Company Limited (hereinafter referred to as the "company") as the angle of view, elaborated the legal issues related to the transfer of defective equity. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this paper divided for the four parts. The first part is the legal definition of defective equity; classification of defective equity defects in different factors, namely capital contribution flaw, the main error and procedural flaws The defective equity; the defective equity transfer behavior of limited company will divided the agreement transfer and non transfer agreement; transfer agreement also includes internal and external transfer agreement, non transfer agreement mainly involves the problem of inheritance, matrimonial equity and enforcement. The second part is about the defective equity transfer agreement, responsibility the relief and analysis are discussed. The author through the analysis of domestic different effectiveness theory respectively, validity of the defective equity transfer agreement and external transfer agreement; discuss the defective equity transfer and the transferee of the company, shareholders, creditors bear the responsibility; clear the defective equity transfer in the goodwill of the legal definition, and on the basis of the existing the law, discuss the goodwill relief people. Some problems of the third part of the non defective equity transfer agreement were analyzed. In succession the flaw of equity, Just clear to all kinds of defective equity inheritance, inheritance, people assume responsibility to inherit the legitimacy of the couple; there are various defects of equity segmentation, and segmentation exist in the legislation and practice problems; research on all kinds of defective equity is forced the legitimacy of execution, and execution of defective equity, should pay attention to the problem. The fourth part according to the type of defective equity, put forward the suggestion to improve the system, including: the defective equity transfer agreement, given the bona fide assignee's right of revocation, on behalf of litigation right remedy; there are husband and wife in the defective equity segmentation, improve the evaluation mechanism; in the process of defective equity transfer system in perfecting the compulsory purchase system, establish the preemptive right system of accountability, clear enforcement procedures in the exercise of preemptive right.

【学位授予单位】：中国社会科学院研究生院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】