旅行社转团中的责任承担--德国法视角的考察

发布时间：2018-03-03 20:26

本文选题：旅游合同　切入点：交易安全义务　出处：德国法视角的考察　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：德国法上,旅游合同与旅游中介合同不同,后者是一种事务处理合同。必须结合旅游产品说明书的明示、旅游服务的组织过程综合判断旅游合同与旅游中介合同。德国法上的旅游组织者不仅可能根据旅游合同承担旅游瑕疵的损害赔偿责任,而且可能因其违反以选择、监督为内容的交易安全义务而承担侵权责任,不过由于旅游合同法上损害赔偿责任范围的不断扩大,旅游侵权责任呈现收缩态势。具体旅游服务的提供者,通常被认为是旅游组织者的履行辅助人而非事务辅助人,旅游组织者对其过错承担合同法上的债务不履行责任。从德国法上来看,我国旅游市场上的转团行为,应当认定为债务承担或合同承担,但未经旅游者同意或追认的,应该认定为债务加入或合同加入,由组团社与受让社对旅游者承担连带责任。
[Abstract]:In German law, tourism contracts are different from travel agency contracts, which are transaction contracts. They must be combined with the express statement of tourism products. The organizing process of tourism service synthetically judges the tourism contract and the tourism intermediary contract. The tourism organizer in German law may not only bear the liability for the damage caused by the tourism defect according to the tourism contract, but also may choose it because of its violation. Supervision assumes tort liability for content transaction safety obligations. However, due to the continuous expansion of the scope of liability for damages under the Tourism contract Law, the liability for tourism infringement is shrinking. The tour organizer is usually regarded as the executive assistant of the tourism organizer rather than the assistant of affairs, and the tourist organizer is not liable for his fault under the contract law. From the point of view of German law, the transfer behavior in the tourism market of our country, It should be regarded as debt commitment or contractual commitment, but without the consent or ratification of the tourist, it should be recognized as joining the debt or the contract, and the regiment and the transfer agency shall bear joint and several liability to the tourist.
【作者单位】：北京第二外国语学院国际法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金项目“我国旅游立法重大问题研究”(项目编号:12BGL069) 国家旅游局旅游业青年专家培养计划“旅游法基础理论研究与实务应对”(项目编号:TYETP201503)”的阶段性成果
【分类号】：D951.6;DD912.29

【相似文献】