当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 经济法论文 >

我国纵向垄断协议的法律规制研究

发布时间:2018-03-04 00:05

  本文选题:纵向垄断协议 切入点:合理原则 出处:《昆明理工大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:纵向垄断协议是垄断协议行为的一种,是指处于不同经营环节的经营者达成的排除或限制竞争的协议。相对于横向垄断协议而言,纵向垄断协议对经济发展的积极效果比较明显,其结果具有隐蔽性,因此纵向垄断的认定更为复杂,不能简单地运用本身违法原则去对纵向垄断协议进行严格规制。本文是以茅台、五粮液纵向垄断协议的案例作为切入点,进而引出本文的研究对象,即纵向垄断协议的法律规制。首先从整体上对纵向垄断协议进行把握,对其基本特征、对经济秩序产生的双重影响以及实践中的判定原则做了详细的阐述。结合我国《反垄断法》对纵向垄断协议的具体规定,探析我国对纵向垄断协议规制中的不足之处,主要是现行的规制模式不合理、规制原则单一以及宽恕制度不健全,以至于不能有效的制约当前频发的纵向垄断协议。美国、欧盟的反垄断法实施较早,在具体的运用过程中,不断发展出适合本国经济的具体制度。对纵向垄断协议的规制从本身违法原则逐渐演变为合理原则,规制态度趋于缓和。在规制的过程中,各国具有特色的宽恕制度对瓦解纵向垄断协议起到了非常重要的作用。他山之石,可以攻玉。我国在对纵向垄断协议的规制中,可以合理的借鉴和吸收国外对纵向垄断协议规制的经验。结合我国的实际情况,提出了我国对纵向垄断协议的规制应该完善规制模式、扩大列举类型、引入合理原则对纵向非价格垄断协议进行规制、完善宽恕制度等具体新举措。
[Abstract]:Vertical monopoly agreement is a kind of monopoly agreement behavior, which refers to the agreement to exclude or restrict competition reached by operators in different business links. The positive effect of vertical monopoly agreement on economic development is obvious, and the result is hidden, so the identification of vertical monopoly is more complicated. We can't simply apply the principle of illegality to strictly regulate the vertical monopoly agreement. This paper takes the case of Maotai and Wuliangye as the starting point, and then leads to the research object of this paper. That is, the legal regulation of vertical monopoly agreement. This paper expounds in detail the double influence of economic order and the judgment principle in practice. In combination with the specific provisions of China's Anti-monopoly Law on the vertical monopoly agreement, this paper probes into the deficiencies in the regulation of the vertical monopoly agreement in our country. It is mainly because the current regulation mode is unreasonable, the principle of regulation is single and the system of forgiveness is not perfect, so that it can not effectively restrict the current frequent vertical monopoly agreement. The antimonopoly law of the United States, the European Union has been implemented earlier, in the concrete application process. The regulation of vertical monopoly agreement gradually evolves from the principle of violation of law to the principle of rationality, and the attitude of regulation tends to ease. The characteristic leniency system of various countries has played a very important role in breaking up the vertical monopoly agreement. We can reasonably draw lessons from and absorb the experience of foreign countries in regulating vertical monopoly agreements. According to the actual situation of our country, this paper puts forward that the regulation of longitudinal monopoly agreements in our country should improve the regulation mode and expand the enumeration types. Introduce reasonable principle to regulate vertical non-price monopoly agreement and perfect forgiving system.
【学位授予单位】:昆明理工大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D922.294

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前4条

1 许光耀;;《反垄断法》中垄断协议诸条款之评析[J];法学杂志;2008年01期

2 王晓晔;;《中华人民共和国反垄断法》析评[J];法学研究;2008年04期

3 邓志松;;纵向垄断协议解析[J];中国外资;2008年01期

4 陈云良;陈婷;;垄断协议中协同行为的证明问题研究[J];政治与法律;2008年10期

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 夏建民;试论我国反垄断法对纵向限制竞争协议的规制[D];华东政法大学;2010年

2 陈凌;论纵向垄断协议的认定和豁免[D];上海社会科学院;2011年

3 李学科;纵向垄断协议的法律规制研究[D];华东政法大学;2009年

4 杨艳;纵向垄断协议及其法律规制[D];苏州大学;2009年

5 赵星;反垄断法中纵向垄断协议规制的研究[D];湖南大学;2011年



本文编号:1563264

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1563264.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户602b1***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com