垄断行为法律责任条款实施困境的消解

发布时间：2018-03-05 05:12

本文选题：垄断行为　切入点：停止违法行为　出处：《法学》2017年09期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：对于责令停止违法行为,反垄断执法机构应当通过做法示范指引促进机制和合规自证报告保障机制来共同推进经营者积极采取措施进行有效整改。对于没收违法所得的处罚,反垄断执法机构应当将违法所得的范围限定在经营者因垄断行为而获得的超额利润上,至于具体数额应由当事人进行充分举证,反垄断执法机构则有权依据自身的合理怀疑对此进行自由裁量。对于并处行政罚款,比例自由裁量模式与损害赔偿折算模式各有利弊,从保持执法公平性与行政罚款的深层属性上看,采损害赔偿折算模式更为妥当。但依现行的执法条件,可暂允许采用比例自由裁量模式作为过渡,在此过程中反垄断执法机构应当统一会计年度、营业额、罚款比例的选择标准。
[Abstract]:As for ordering an illegal act to stop, the antitrust law enforcement agency shall jointly promote the operators to take measures to effectively rectify the illegal behavior through the practice model guidance promotion mechanism and the compliance self-certification report guarantee mechanism. Anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies shall limit the scope of illegal proceeds to the excess profits obtained by the operators as a result of monopolistic acts, and the specific amount shall be fully substantiated by the parties, Anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies, on the other hand, have the right to exercise their discretion on the basis of their reasonable doubts. For administrative fines, the proportional discretion model and the commutation model for damages have both advantages and disadvantages. From the view of maintaining the fairness of law enforcement and the deep attribute of administrative penalty, it is more appropriate to adopt the commutation mode of damage compensation. However, according to the current law enforcement conditions, the proportional discretion model can be temporarily allowed as a transition. In this process, antitrust law enforcement agencies shall unify the selection criteria for fiscal year, turnover, and the proportion of fines.
【作者单位】：上海政法学院经济法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金青年项目《中国(上海)自由贸易试验区竞争中立政策研究》(批准号:14CFX043)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】