我国经营者集中附加限制性条件批准法律制度研究
本文选题:经营者集中 切入点:经营者集中附加限制性条件批准 出处:《河南大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:一直以来,经营者为了做大做强,往往通过经营者集中形成规模经济,这是其追求规模效益的重要手段,对推动经济发展、社会进步的作用不可小觑,但是,经营者集中本身是一把双刃剑,在带来经济效益的同时存在或者可能存在具有排除、限制竞争等反竞争效果的风险,因此,如何避免经营者集中带来的反竞争效果是世界各国关注的重点。经营者集中控制制度、规制垄断协议法律制度、规制滥用市场支配地位的法律制度是我国反垄断法律制度的三大支柱。其中,经营者集中控制制度在我国反垄断法律制度中具有重要地位。经营者集中控制是国家干预市场的一种手段,由于经营者集中是一把双刃剑,既要维持经营者集中带动经济效益、规模效益的发展,又要规避经营者集中存在或者可能存在的阻碍竞争、破坏竞争秩序等反竞争效果的出现,因此,对经营者集中不能因噎废食的一律禁止,而应就其具体的积极效果和反竞争效果进行认定权衡,对不具有严重的排除、限制竞争等反竞争效果的经营者集中国务院反垄断执法机构一般不予以竞争关注或予以批准的决定,对具有严重的排除、限制竞争等反竞争效果的经营者集中一般予以直接禁止的决定,而对于不会导致严重排除、限制竞争等反竞争效果的经营者集中经营者允许附条件批准,即允许通过附加限制性条件对经营者集中具有或者可能具有的排除、限制竞争的效果进行补救。以维持经营者集中前的正常的市场竞争秩序和市场竞争活力。我国《反垄断法》自2008年实施以来,《国务院关于经营者集中申报标准的规定》、《经营者集中申报办法》、《经营者集中审查办法》、《关于经营者集中附加限制性条件的规定(试行)》等配套规则不断完善,我国反垄断执法机关的执法经验不断丰富,执法能力得到提高,但我国经营者集中附加限制性条件批准制度尚未形成完整体系。本文通过对我国现行经营者集中附加限制性条件批准法律制度的研究,结合实际案例,试图对现行制度的健全和完善提出建议。遵循该研究思路,文章共有四个部分:第一部分,经营者集中附加限制性条件批准法律制度的基本理论。这一部分主要对经营者集中附加限制性条件批准的基本含义、理论基础及其适用前提进行梳理,对该制度的形成与发展及其在整个反垄断法律制度中的重要地位有更清晰的认识。第二部分,我国现行经营者集中附加限制性条件批准法律制度的主要内容。该部分对我国现行经营者集中附加限制性条件批准法律制度及执法过程中的实践案例进行分析,认为限制性条件的提出、确定、实施、监督及法律责任的设置是经营者集中附加限制性条件批准的重要环节,对消除反竞争效果的实现具有重要意义。第三部分,我国经营者集中附加限制性条件批准法律制度存在的问题。通过上述两部分对我国经营者集中附加限制性条件批准法律制度的基本理论和现行制度的研究,指出我国现行制度中存在的问题,如相关法律规定较原则,操作性不强,以及在实际案件审查中审查过程不透明、信息披露不足、后续监督力量薄弱、监督机制不完善等,并对上述问题进行分析。第四部分,我国经营者集中附加限制性条件批准法律制度的完善建议。该部分针对第三部分中提出的问题,试图对我国经营者集中附加限制性条件批准制度的健全和体系的完善提出建议。我国反垄断法起步较晚,通过对外国先进立法技术和丰富执法经验的借鉴,结合我国执法实践,在对既往案例进行研究,建立理由说明制度、信息报告制度、公共利益测试制度等方面提出建议。
[Abstract]:Since the operators in order to become bigger and stronger, tend to form scale economy through business concentration, which is an important means to the pursuit of scale, to promote economic development and social progress should not be overlooked, but the concentration itself is a double-edged sword, there may exist or excluded from bringing economic benefits at the same time, the risk of the effect of restricting competition, therefore, how to avoid the anti competitive effects of the concentration of business operators bring is the focus of the world. The control system of concentration of business operators, regulate the monopoly agreement in legal system, the legal system of regulation of abuse of market dominant position is one of the three pillars of China's anti-monopoly law system. The operator centralized control system in China's anti-monopoly law system has an important position. The operator centralized control is a means of state intervention in the market, because the operator is concentrated A double-edged sword, both to maintain focus on promoting economic benefit the development of operators, economies of scale, but also to avoid the concentration of business operators exist or may exist hinder competition, destroy the competition order such anti competitive effects of the concentration of business operators shall be banned and not unworthy, should the positive effect of concrete and anti competitive effects that balance, serious exclusion does not have, operators restricting competition effect of the anti monopoly law enforcement agency under the State Council focused attention is generally not be competition or approve the decision to exclude serious, operators restricting competition effect can be directly concentrated against the decision, but to not lead to serious exclude operators restricting competition effect of the concentration of business operators to allow conditional approval, which allows additional restrictive conditions of business by Their concentration has or may have excluded the effect of restricting competition remedy. In order to maintain the concentration of business operators before the normal order of market competition and market competition vigor. China's "anti-monopoly law" since 2008 since the implementation of the provisions of the State Council "on notification thresholds > > < centralized declaration operator, review procedures < < > centralized operator, provisions on additional restrictive conditions of concentration of business operators (Trial) > matching rules continue to improve, China's anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies of law enforcement experience enriched, law enforcement ability can be improved, but China's operators focus on additional restrictive conditions approved by the system has not yet formed a complete system. Based on the research of China the concentration of business operators to approve the additional restrictive conditions of the legal system, combined with the actual case, to give some suggestions and improvements to the existing system. According to the research ideas, The paper consists of four parts: the first part, the basic theory of the concentration of business operators to approve the additional restrictive conditions of the legal system. The main part of the basic meaning of the concentration of business operators to approve the additional restrictive conditions, theoretical basis and premise to sort out, have a clear understanding on the formation and development of the system in the anti monopoly the legal system in an important position. In the second part, the main content of China's current operators focus on additional restrictive conditions approved by the legal system. This part carries on the analysis to the practical case of additional restrictive conditions to the concentration of China's current legal system and law enforcement executive approval process, that the restrictive conditions of determining, implementation, supervision and the legal responsibility of the concentration of business operators is an important link to approve the additional restrictive conditions, is of great significance to eliminate the anti competitive effects of the third. In part, the presence of additional restrictive conditions approved the anti-monopoly law. Through the study of the two part of our operators to focus on additional restrictive conditions approved by the basic theory of legal system and the existing system, points out the existing problems in our current system, such as the relevant provisions of the law is the principle, operability is not strong, the review process and opaque cases in the actual review, insufficient information disclosure, follow-up supervision and weak supervision mechanism is not perfect, and to analyze these issues. The fourth part, China's operators focus on additional restrictive conditions approved proposals on perfecting the legal system. This part puts forward the problems in the third part, I try to the concentration of additional restrictions perfect conditions of approval system and system are proposed. The late start of China's anti-monopoly law, based on the foreign advanced legislation. Based on the experience of law enforcement and rich law enforcement experience, combined with the practice of law enforcement in China, we put forward suggestions on past cases, establishing reason explanation system, information reporting system, and public interest testing system.
【学位授予单位】:河南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D922.294
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 刘武朝;;论经营者集中附限制性条件执行争议的仲裁适用[J];河北法学;2013年10期
2 ;我国将出台三部反垄断法配套规则[J];造纸信息;2011年11期
3 刘春霞;白云;;确立我国登记离婚限制性条件之探讨[J];经济研究导刊;2009年05期
4 刘武朝;;论经营者集中反垄断审查中的“皇冠宝石”制度——兼评《关于经营者集中附加限制性条件的规定(征求意见稿)》第19条[J];理论月刊;2014年03期
5 杨茂喜;刘武朝;;我国附条件批准经营者集中的发展与完善[J];中国高新技术企业;2011年27期
6 ;反垄断法新配套法规即将出台[J];乙醛醋酸化工;2014年06期
7 邱春霖;;论反垄断法中附条件批准经营者集中制度[J];法治研究;2009年10期
8 陈颖;;我国非政府组织发展的限制性条件及其路径探析[J];内蒙古农业大学学报(社会科学版);2012年05期
9 金凤涛,曹世华;立体商标注册的限制性条件[J];法学杂志;2005年06期
10 丛颖超 ,林晓东;正确认识税收作用的限制性条件[J];理论学刊;1996年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前8条
1 维峰;经营者集中附加限制性条件规定征求意见[N];中国工商报;2013年
2 中国人民大学法学院 吴长军;附加限制性条件承认经营者集中案例评析[N];国际商报;2009年
3 王希;商务部解读经营者集中申报办法和审查办法[N];中国国门时报;2010年
4 王沛霖;商务部有附加限制性条件批准微软收购诺基亚设备和服务业务[N];中国计算机报;2014年
5 本报记者 叶琦;安徽“公考” 取消所有加分[N];人民日报;2013年
6 张晨颖;经营者集中的限制性条件之适用[N];国际商报;2010年
7 黄标;零售促销新规能否冲破“打折迷雾”[N];检察日报;2006年
8 姚宗;经营者集中反垄断审查依法有序进行[N];国际商报;2008年
相关硕士学位论文 前9条
1 安寿辉;经营者集中的附限制性条件研究[D];云南财经大学;2011年
2 高铭晗;论我国经营者集中附条件批准中的行为性条件[D];中国青年政治学院;2015年
3 张昱沁;经营者集中附加限制性条件研究[D];南京财经大学;2015年
4 罗旭;经营者集中附条件批准效用分析[D];暨南大学;2015年
5 朱琳;我国经营者集中附加限制性条件批准法律制度研究[D];河南大学;2015年
6 朱凤林;经营者集中审查中的附加限制性条件研究[D];南京师范大学;2011年
7 赵健;经营者集中附加限制性条件研究[D];郑州大学;2013年
8 疏平;中美经营者集中附加限制性条件制度比较研究[D];安徽大学;2014年
9 付静;美国、欧盟及我国经营者集中救济制度的比较研究[D];浙江大学;2014年
,本文编号:1600855
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1600855.html