论维持转售价格规制理论之争及其影响

发布时间：2018-03-13 19:00

本文选题：维持转售价格　切入点：纵向限制　出处：《河南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2015年02期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：维持转售价格协议具有既可能便于经营者实施价格共谋,又可能提升服务质量、便于新企业进入等双重市场效果。促进竞争论基于不完全性较小等市场结构,认为该行为具有防止搭便车,促进竞争的积极作用;限制竞争理论则基于不完全性较大等市场结构,认为其具有减损消费者利益、阻碍效率的限制竞争效果。两大理论之争的核心,在于双方基于不同的市场结构。由此,各国执法机关在认定维持转售价格市场效果时,应辩证地吸收两大理论的合理性,根据一定的市场结构和消费者利益减损情况进行判定。同时,为防止维持转售价格规制过度之风险,通过附随性限制理论对传统本身违法原则之适用予以完善。
[Abstract]:Maintaining resale price agreements has dual market effects, such as facilitating operators to carry out price collusion, improving service quality and facilitating entry of new enterprises. It is considered that this behavior has the positive effect of preventing hitchhiking and promoting competition, while the theory of limiting competition is based on the market structure of incompleteness, which is considered to detract from the interests of consumers. The core of the dispute between the two theories is that they are based on different market structures. As a result, the law enforcement agencies of various countries should dialectically absorb the rationality of the two theories when they decide to maintain the market effect of resale prices. At the same time, in order to prevent the risk of maintaining the excessive regulation of resale price, the application of the traditional illegal principle is perfected by the theory of accompanying restriction.
【作者单位】：郑州大学法学院;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目(13SFB3035) 河南省高校科技创新人才项目(14HASTIT002) 河南省软科学项目(142400410059)
【分类号】：D912.29

【参考文献】