台湾民间参与公共建设评审问题研究及其启示

发布时间：2018-03-16 15:05

本文选题：台湾地区　切入点：公私合作　出处：《深圳大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在十八届三中全会提出“允许社会资本通过特许经营等方式参与城市基础设施投资和运营”的改革方向之后,PPP模式在我国迎来新一轮的发展浪潮。PPP模式核心是公共部门和私营部门通过建立一种长期的合作伙伴关系提供公共服务,实现公共部门、私营部门、社会公共利益的三方共赢。因此评选出最佳的私营部门进行合作对于PPP项目的成功至关重要。本文通过研究我国台湾地区《促进民间参与公共建设法》(简称《促参法》)在评审阶段出现的立法及实践问题,结合我国大陆PPP评审现状,对PPP的评审环节提出相关建议,以期更好的推动PPP在我国的发展。首先,根据《促参法》评审规范要求分析评审的应然状态。主要包括《促参法》关于评审的主要规定和《民间参与公共建设评审委员会组织及评审办法》(简称《评审办法》)对《促参法》的细化。《促参法》主要从由民间参与公共建设的公告、评审委员会的设置及评审原则等方面对评审环节进行规范。《评审办法》则对评审委员会的任务、人员组成、委员选任方式、委员禁止情形、委员回避情形等作出了进一步细化。其次,以ETC案为切入点分析台湾地区民间参与公共建设评审存在的主要问题,即评审的实然状态,并在分析其原因的基础上提出解决建议。本部分认为评审阶段主要存在四个方面的问题,包括评审委员会设置不合理、评审程序规范不足、评审结果公告的法律性质不明、评审决定的司法审查标准缺乏。最后,通过对大陆PPP评审现状的分析,吸取台湾地区经验教训,提出相关启示。PPP统一立法尚未出台,推广时间尚短,若要实现健康有序发展,同样需要克服过去招投标评审中存在的顽疾。如评审专家缺乏公正性、专注性、可问责性;投标人串标、围标现象严重;行政机关的不合理行政干预;法院对招投标评审的审查仅为粗略程序审等。在上述研究基础上,本文对此提出了相关对策。
[Abstract]:After the third Plenary session of the 18 CPC Central Committee put forward the reform direction of "allowing social capital to participate in the investment and operation of urban infrastructure by means of franchise", the core of the PPP model in China is a new wave of development. The core of the PPP model is the public. The public sector and the private sector provide public services through a long-term partnership, The public sector, the private sector, Therefore, the selection of the best private sector cooperation is very important to the success of the PPP project. This paper studies the "promoting Private participation in Public Construction Law" in Taiwan area of China (abbreviated as "promoting Private participation in Public Construction"). The legislative and practical problems that arise during the evaluation stage, According to the current situation of PPP review in mainland China, this paper puts forward some suggestions on the review of PPP in order to better promote the development of PPP in China. According to the requirements of the evaluation criterion of the law of promoting participation, the paper analyzes the status of the review. It mainly includes the main provisions of the law on the promotion of membership and the measures for the organization and evaluation of the civil participation in the public construction review and evaluation committee (abbreviated as the "office for review and evaluation"). Methods >) refinement of the Law on the Promotion of Public participation. The public notice of participation in public construction by the people is the main part of the Law on the Promotion of participation in the Promotion of people's participation. The establishment and evaluation principles of the review and appraisal committee shall regulate the evaluation links. The "measures for evaluation" shall deal with the task, composition, selection and appointment of the members of the review and appraisal committee, and the prohibition of the members, Second, the ETC case is taken as a starting point to analyze the main problems existing in Taiwan's non-governmental participation in the review of public construction, that is, the actual status of the review. Based on the analysis of the reasons, the author puts forward some suggestions. This part considers that there are four main problems in the review stage, including unreasonable setting of the review committee, insufficient standard of the review procedure, unclear legal nature of the announcement of the results of the review. Finally, through the analysis of the current situation of the PPP review in the mainland, drawing lessons from the experience and lessons of the Taiwan region, the author puts forward the relevant enlightenment... The unified legislation has not yet been promulgated, and the promotion time is still short. If we want to achieve healthy and orderly development, It is also necessary to overcome the stubborn problems existing in the past bidding evaluation, such as the lack of impartiality, concentration and accountability of the evaluation experts, the serious phenomenon of the bidders' bundling and the unreasonable administrative intervention of the administrative organs; The court's examination of tender evaluation is only rough procedure, etc. On the basis of the above research, this paper puts forward some relevant countermeasures.
【学位授予单位】：深圳大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D927;D922.297

【相似文献】