反垄断私人诉讼原告资格研究
发布时间:2018-03-19 14:21
本文选题:反垄断私人诉讼 切入点:原告资格 出处:《广东财经大学》2015年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:反垄断法是保护市场竞争,防止和制止垄断行为,维护市场秩序的重要法律。反垄断法在发达国家的有效实施表明,经济的高速发展需要依靠制定相关法律来规范市场竞争行为。越来越多国家认识到反垄断法在经济规制所带来的作用。其中,反垄断私人诉讼中的原告资格确定问题是展开诉讼的前提。因此,确定私人诉讼的原告资格范围意义重大。全文共分为三章:第一章对何为反垄断私人诉讼及其原告资格问题做了详细论述,介绍了四种原告类型:竞争者、间接购买者、群体性受害者、消费者。同时,通过美国实践中确立的“损害”标准和德国的“受影响”标准来探讨确定原告资格范围所考虑的因素,并通过我国立法上对原告资格的模糊规定来阐述确立原告资格标准的意义。第二章通过几个案例介绍国外发达国家在反垄断私人诉讼中确定原告资格的立法进程与各自所遇到的问题,系统对其问题进行评述并总结其中经验,为我国确定私人诉讼原告资格范围提供理论支持。第三章通过介绍我国现行反垄断法和相关司法解释对私人诉讼原告资格范围的笼统规定,同时借鉴世界各国的立法经验,提出在我国《反垄断法》的基础上新增法律条文来完善原告资格范围。从立法层面上切实改变我国反垄断私人诉讼原告资格范围不明导致的起诉难与胜诉率低的问题,保障反垄断私人诉讼原被告双方的合法权益。并对竞争者、间接购买者、群体性受害者的原告资格问题提出相关制度建议。
[Abstract]:Anti-monopoly law is an important law to protect market competition, prevent and stop monopoly behavior and maintain market order. The effective implementation of anti-monopoly law in developed countries shows that, The rapid development of economy needs to make relevant laws to regulate market competition behavior. More and more countries realize the role of anti-monopoly law in economic regulation. The question of determining the plaintiff's qualification in private antitrust litigation is a prerequisite for initiating a lawsuit. It is of great significance to determine the scope of plaintiff qualification in private litigation. This paper is divided into three chapters: chapter one discusses in detail what is an antitrust private action and its plaintiff qualification, and introduces four types of plaintiffs: competitors, indirect purchasers, Group victims, consumers. At the same time, through the "damage" criterion established in United States practice and the German "affected" criterion, the factors considered in determining the scope of the plaintiff's qualification are discussed, The second chapter introduces the legislative process of determining plaintiff qualification in private antitrust litigation in developed countries through several cases. And the problems they encounter, The system reviews its problems and summarizes their experiences. The third chapter introduces the general provisions of the scope of private litigation plaintiff qualification in China's current anti-monopoly law and related judicial interpretation, and at the same time draws lessons from the legislative experience of other countries in the world, and provides theoretical support for the determination of the scope of the plaintiff's qualification in private litigation in China. On the basis of our country's Anti-monopoly Law, the author puts forward a new legal provision to perfect the scope of plaintiff's qualification. From the legislative level, it can effectively change the difficulty of prosecution and the low rate of success caused by the unclear scope of plaintiff's qualification in private antitrust litigation in our country. To protect the legal rights and interests of the original defendants in private antitrust litigation, and to put forward relevant system suggestions on the plaintiff qualification of competitors, indirect purchasers and group victims.
【学位授予单位】:广东财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 张骏;;我国《反垄断法》的立法目的研究[J];重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版);2012年05期
2 沈志韬;;从国际经验看中国反垄断私人执行制度的建立[J];世界贸易组织动态与研究;2010年03期
3 谷帆凯;;反垄断私人诉讼制度的必要性分析[J];政法学刊;2011年04期
相关硕士学位论文 前6条
1 袁有华;反垄断法国家民事诉讼制度研究[D];湖南大学;2010年
2 王慧敏;反垄断公益诉讼若干法律问题研究[D];湖南大学;2008年
3 邓文锋;反垄断法私人执行制度比较研究[D];湖南大学;2010年
4 李小凡;反垄断诉讼中消费者的原告资格法律问题研究[D];北京交通大学;2012年
5 朱晓艳;反垄断民事损害赔偿制度比较研究[D];湖南大学;2011年
6 周秋云;反垄断民事诉讼中间接购买者原告资格问题研究[D];湘潭大学;2013年
,本文编号:1634640
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1634640.html