标准必要专利滥用的反垄断规制研究

发布时间：2018-03-25 13:36

本文选题：标准化　切入点：标准必要专利　出处：《安徽财经大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：标准与专利的融合成就了知识经济的最大效能,同时,这种结合也为标准必要专利的滥用埋下了隐患。在标准化的进程中,先天性垄断私权被赋予了新的公共产品属性,直接在相关市场中占据了垄断地位,专利持有人和潜在标准实施者的谈判地位因而发生剧变,私法自治的协议模式无法在双方或多方间达成合意,专利法中的专利实施许可制度将难以为继,更为严重的是,专利标准化后专利权人极易滥用专利标准化带来的强势地位,在利润的引诱下对标准必要专利滥用,以排除、限制市场竞争。发达国家借助自身累积的经济与科技实力,较早地实施专利标准化战略,在诸多领域占据优势地位,成为标准必要专利的聚居地;而发展中国家(包括我国)则沦为发达国家的技术、专利、标准的输入国,更是标准必要专利滥用的重灾区。IDC案的发生并不是偶然,但法律与制度缺失却让我们猝不及防。本文拟对标准必要专利的形成、实施及退出中的权利滥用行为进行剖析,并以《指南》为重心,具体就各种标准必要专利垄断行为的规制提出立法建议。第一章以标准与专利的特性为基础,重点分析了标准与专利的融合过程,区分了必要专利和必要专利权利要求,介绍了标准必要专利的实施过程;第二章结合标准必要专利的特征,就标准必要专利在形成、实施、退出中的可能发生的垄断行为进行了剖析;第三章基于我国相关立法现状,主张我国应采取严格的反垄断立法与执法政策,同时参照国外相关反垄断经验,为国内立法模式的选择提供有益借鉴;第四章论述了标准必要专利滥用的反垄断基本思路,并以《指南》为基点对具体反垄断制度提出立法建议。
[Abstract]:The combination of standards and patents has achieved the greatest effectiveness of knowledge economy, and at the same time, this combination has also laid a hidden danger for the abuse of necessary standard patents. In the process of standardization, congenital monopoly private rights have been endowed with new attributes of public goods. As a result, the negotiation position of patent holders and potential standard implementers has changed dramatically, and the agreement mode of autonomy of private law cannot reach agreement between both parties or parties. The patent enforcement licensing system in the patent law will be difficult to continue. What is more, after patent standardization, the patentee is prone to abuse the strong position brought by patent standardization and abuse the standard necessary patent under the inducement of profit, in order to exclude, Restricted market competition. Developed countries, with their accumulated economic and technological strength, implemented the patent standardization strategy earlier, occupied a dominant position in many fields, and became a gathering place for the necessary patents. The fact that developing countries (including China) have become the technology, patent, standard importing countries of developed countries, and the disaster area. IDC case of standard essential patent abuse, is not accidental. However, the absence of laws and systems caught us off guard. This paper intends to analyze the formation, implementation and withdrawal of the necessary standard patents, and focus on the guidelines. The first chapter, based on the characteristics of standards and patents, analyzes the fusion process of standards and patents, and distinguishes between necessary patents and essential patent claims. The second chapter analyzes the possible monopoly behavior in the formation, implementation and withdrawal of the standard essential patent. Chapter 3 is based on the status quo of the relevant legislation in our country, the second chapter is based on the characteristics of the standard necessary patent, and analyzes the possible monopoly behavior in the formation, implementation and withdrawal of the standard necessary patent. It is advocated that our country should adopt strict antitrust legislation and enforcement policies, and at the same time, refer to the relevant antitrust experience of foreign countries, and provide useful reference for the choice of domestic legislative model. Chapter four discusses the basic ideas of anti-monopoly in the abuse of standard necessary patents. At the same time, based on the Guide, the author puts forward legislative suggestions on the specific anti-monopoly system.
【学位授予单位】：安徽财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】