管理人选任机制实证研究——以江苏法院管理人选任机制改革实践为蓝本

发布时间：2018-03-25 17:31

本文选题：管理人　切入点：选任机制　出处：《法律适用》2017年15期

【摘要】：《最高人民法院关于审理企业破产案件指定管理人的规定》自2007年6月施行至今,已近10年,管理人选任机制在审判实践中暴露出诸多问题。调研发现,受访者普遍认为当前的管理人选任机制存在名册固化、方式机械、程序不透明等问题,亟需改革和优化。为制定科学合理的管理人选任制度,在公开、公平、公正的基础上,选出能够满足个案需要的管理人,我们深入调查研究,通过对第一手资料的统计分析,并从选任机构改革的必要性、可行性和合理性等角度进行了论述,运用实证研究的方法,结合江苏法院的试点实践,归纳和总结试点改革工作取得的成效及面临的困难,有针对性地提出解决的对策,以期构建高效、科学的新型管理人选任制度。
[Abstract]:Since June 2007, it has been nearly 10 years since the Supreme people's Court decided to appoint an administrator to try an enterprise bankruptcy case. The mechanism of selecting and appointing an administrator has exposed many problems in the trial practice. The interviewees generally believed that the current administrator selection mechanism had problems such as roster solidification, mechanization, and opacity of procedures, which urgently needed to be reformed and optimized. In order to establish a scientific and reasonable administrator selection system, on the basis of openness, fairness and fairness, To select managers who can meet the needs of individual cases, we conduct in-depth investigation and study, through the statistical analysis of first-hand information, and from the point of view of the necessity, feasibility and reasonableness of the reform of elected institutions, we use the method of empirical research. Combined with the trial practice of Jiangsu court, the paper sums up the achievements and difficulties of the pilot reform, and puts forward some countermeasures to solve the problems in order to build a new system of selecting and appointing managers with high efficiency and science.
【作者单位】：江苏省高级人民法院民二庭;江苏省高级人民法院民二庭综合组;
【分类号】：D922.291.92

【相似文献】