对赌协议合法性的司法演进

发布时间：2018-03-29 18:31

  本文选题：对赌协议　切入点：附条件的合同　出处：《南京大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文共分三章。第一章是问题的提出。笔者根据两大经典案例指出对赌协议裁判理念的变化。案例一为"海富投资案",其经典意义在于该案是对赌协议首次进入司法领域,也正是学界和实务界探讨对赌协议的开端(也是争议的开端)。案例二是"瑞讽投资案",其经典意义在于,法院不仅跳出了传统民事合同的审裁思维,更是明确的提出了审判对赌协议的四大原则。对赌协议的裁判理念之所以会发生上述转变,是因为学界和实务界对对赌协议性质的认识与解读已更为深入、准确。本文就是要揭示该种裁判理念发展的历程,从而推演出对赌协议的本质及与之适应的裁判理念。第二章分为三个小节,主要是论证对赌协议不适应传统的裁判理念,这也是为何"海富投资案"审判结果不一且争议不断的原因。其中第一节立足于对赌协议自身,抽出对赌协议的核心条款"不确定条件",对其进行种类和性质的探析。第二节则是将传统民法中对"附条件的合同"的定义与对赌协议中的"不确定条件"进行对比,结合王泽鉴等人的理论两相对比之后,得出结论:包含"不确定条件"的对赌协议与传统民法的"附条件的合同"是两个不同的概念。第三节则是在发现对赌协议既不能以附条件合同简单审裁,又不能一概而论认定非法的情况下,得出对赌协议为司法界的审判带来了实质性障碍的结论。第三章就是探讨如何解决上述审判思维障碍,换言之就是在对赌协议不适应传统传统裁判理念的前提下,对其裁判理念的再探讨。本章同样分为三小节,第一小节从对赌协议产生的理论基础和其现实意义的角度论证其为典型的商事合同。第二小节归纳了"海富投资案"后,我国各地各级法院历年来有关对赌协议的审判方式,从中总结出法院审判的趋势及其合理性。最后一节则是根据对赌协议的本质特征以及法院实操的合理性探析个案中应如何把握对赌协议的审判原则。本文的最后是本文的结论,即对赌协议作为附条件的商事合同,应赋予意思自治更大的宽容度,从而加以审裁。
[Abstract]:This paper is divided into three chapters.The first chapter is the proposal of the problem.According to two classic cases, the author points out the change of the concept of gambling agreement referee.Case one is "Haifu Investment case", the classical meaning of which is that this case is the first time that the gambling agreement has entered the judicial field, and it is also the beginning (and the beginning of the dispute) of the academic and practical circles to discuss the gambling agreement.The classic meaning of the case is that the court not only jumped out of the traditional civil contract adjudication thinking, but also put forward the four principles of the trial and gambling agreement.The reason for the above change is that scholars and practitioners have a deeper and more accurate understanding of the nature of gambling agreements.This paper is to reveal the course of the development of this kind of referee idea, and then deduce the essence of the gambling agreement and the judgment idea adapted to it.The second chapter is divided into three sections, mainly to demonstrate that the gambling agreement does not adapt to the traditional concept of the referee, which is why the "Haifu Investment case" trial results are different and controversial reasons.The first section is based on the gambling agreement itself, draws out the core clause of the gambling agreement "uncertainty conditions", and analyzes its kind and nature.The second section is to compare the definition of "conditional contract" in the traditional civil law with the "uncertain condition" in the gambling agreement, combined with the theory of Wang Zejian and others.The conclusion is that the gambling agreement containing "uncertain conditions" is different from the "conditional contract" in the traditional civil law.The third section is to find that the gambling agreement can not be simply adjudicated by conditional contract, nor can it be found to be illegal in a general way. The conclusion is that the gambling agreement has brought substantial obstacles to the trial of judicial circles.The third chapter is to discuss how to solve the above obstacles of judicial thinking, in other words, under the premise that the gambling agreement does not adapt to the traditional judgment idea, the author discusses the judgment idea again.This chapter is also divided into three sections. The first section demonstrates that the gambling agreement is a typical commercial contract from the theoretical basis and its practical significance.In the second section, after "Haifu Investment case", the court at all levels of our country over the years about the trial of gambling agreement, summed up the trend of court trial and its reasonableness.The last section is based on the essential characteristics of the gambling agreement and the reasonableness of the court practice how to grasp the trial principle of the gambling agreement in the case.The last part of this paper is the conclusion of this paper, that is, the gambling agreement as a condition of commercial contracts, should be given greater tolerance of autonomy of will, so as to adjudicate.
【学位授予单位】：南京大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.287
，

本文编号：1682324