中国金融法学研究的实证分析——以1979年以来CLSCI金融法论文为分析对象

发布时间：2018-03-30 03:08

本文选题：金融法学研究　切入点：实证分析　出处：《西南民族大学学报(人文社科版)》2017年04期

【摘要】：对1979年以来的1762篇CLSCI金融法学专业论文的统计分析表明:与中国金融法制和其他部门法研究的蓬勃发展相比,中国金融法学研究力量分散,数量不足,研究缺乏应有的回应性;金融法研究尚未建立公认的学科体系平台,研究集中于证券法、票据法、金融刑法等领域,缺乏应有的广泛性;金融法研究尚未掌握科学独立的研究范式和方法,“寻章摘句”式的概念文本分析仍占较大比例,缺乏应有的深入性;金融法研究缺乏对中国社会转型期金融法制问题的充分关注,缺乏应有的实践性;金融法研究引证率低,质量不高,缺乏应有的科学性,难以对中国金融法制实践形成有效影响。不断提升金融法研究的实践性、科学性和创新性是时代赋予中国金融法研究主体的重要使命。
[Abstract]:The statistical analysis of 1762 CLSCI financial law professional papers since 1979 shows that compared with the vigorous development of China's financial legal system and other branches of law, the research of China's financial law is scattered and insufficient, and the research lacks due responsiveness; The research on financial law has not established a recognized platform of discipline system, and the research is focused on the fields of securities law, negotiable instrument law, financial criminal law and so on. The financial law research has not grasped the scientific independent research paradigm and the method, the concept text analysis of "seek for the chapter and pick the sentence" type still occupies the large proportion, lacks the proper depth; The study of financial law lacks sufficient attention to the problem of financial legal system in the period of social transformation in China, and lacks due practicality, and the research on financial law has low citation rate, low quality and lack of due scientific nature. It is difficult to form an effective influence on the practice of China's financial legal system. It is an important mission given by the times to the subject of financial law research in China to continuously improve the practicality, scientificalness and innovation of the research on financial law.
【作者单位】：西南政法大学经济法学院;
【分类号】：D922.28

【相似文献】