股东代位行使公司归入权法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-03-30 18:04

本文选题：归入权　切入点：股东　出处：《西南科技大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：在所有权与控制权日渐分离的现代公司治理模式下,如何保证董事、监事、高级管理人员等公司负责人的权力正当行使是一个难题。股东代位行使公司归入权制度是有效约束公司负责人权力、保障公司利益的重要制度,理应得到重视。股东可以基于共益权,通过提起诉讼的方式代位行使公司归入权,从而维护公司利益。我国股东代位行使公司归入权制度尚不成熟,原告主体资格备受质疑、被告范围过于狭窄、前置程序适用混乱、诉讼费用过高、举证难、损害赔偿请求权和归入权竞合等问题难以在现有制度中得到妥善解决,需要借鉴国外现有制度对我国归入权相关制度进行完善。英国从股东提起派生诉讼的条件、股东派生诉讼程序规则、股东派生诉讼费用承担等方面对股东代位行使公司归入权制度进行了完善;美国扩大了股东代表公司利益提起派生诉讼的范围、对当事人资格进行了详细规定、设立约束机制以防止股东派生诉讼制度被滥用、为激励股东提起合理的派生诉讼,对原告股东给予诉讼费用补偿;日本对股东派生诉讼制度通过专节予以诠释、引入美国诉讼费用补偿制度、设置股东派生诉讼的前置程序。各国的股东代位行使公司归入权制度可供我国参考和借鉴。通过放宽对原告资格的限制、扩大股东代位行使公司归入权被告的范围、明确公司在股东代位行使公司归入权的地位等完善股东代位行使公司归入权诉讼当事人制度;通过实行案件受理费优惠政策、实行诉讼费用补偿制度等构建股东代位行使公司归入权诉讼激励机制;通过细化股东代位行使归入权诉讼的前置程序、确立诉讼费用担保制度等改进股东代位行使公司归入权诉讼的约束机制。另外从确立法院在股东代位行使公司归入权诉讼中的地位、确定法院的既判力以及允许提起再审、损害赔偿责任和归入权竞合重叠适用等方面给予归入权制度的完善以支持。
[Abstract]:How to ensure the directors and supervisors under the modern corporate governance mode, in which ownership and control are separated day by day, It is a difficult problem for senior managers and other company leaders to exercise their rights properly. The system of shareholder subrogation is an important system that effectively constrains the power of the responsible person of the company and protects the interests of the company. The shareholder can take the subrogation right of the company by way of litigation, so as to safeguard the interests of the company. The system of shareholder's subrogation of corporate subrogation right is not mature, and the qualification of the plaintiff subject is questioned. The scope of the defendant is too narrow, the application of the front procedure is chaotic, the litigation costs are too high, the proof is difficult, the claim for damages and the concurrence of the right of attribution are difficult to be properly solved in the existing system. It is necessary to use the existing system of foreign countries for reference to perfect the relevant system of right of ascription in our country. The system of shareholders' subrogation of corporate subrogation has been perfected, and the scope of shareholders' derivative litigation on behalf of the company has been expanded in the United States, and the qualification of the parties has been specified in detail. Set up the restraint mechanism to prevent the shareholder derivative litigation system from being abused, in order to encourage the shareholders to file the reasonable derivative lawsuit, give the lawsuit cost compensation to the plaintiff shareholder, Japan interprets the shareholder derivative action system through the special section. This paper introduces the compensation system of litigation costs in the United States and sets up the pre-procedure of shareholder derivative action. The system of shareholders' subrogation of corporate subrogation can be used for reference and reference by our country. To expand the scope of shareholder subrogation, to clarify the status of company subrogation in shareholder subrogation, to perfect the litigant system of shareholder subrogation, and to implement the preferential policy of accepting cases, To establish the incentive mechanism of shareholder subrogation in the litigation of the right of subrogation of shareholders, to establish the system of compensation for litigation expenses, to establish the incentive mechanism of litigation of the right of subrogation of shareholders, In addition, from establishing the position of the court in the litigation of the shareholder's subrogation, determining the res judicata of the court and allowing to file a retrial, the system of surety of litigation expenses and so on is established to improve the binding mechanism of the litigation of the right of subrogation of the shareholder to exercise the right of subrogation of the company. Liability for damages and overlapping application of the right of relegation support the perfection of the system of the right of ascription.
【学位授予单位】：西南科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】